PDA

View Full Version : This team will lose to Cleveland



ZachMN
11-19-2017, 03:28 PM
I rest my case.

Teamcheez1
11-19-2017, 03:36 PM
I'm counting on it. That may be the only thing that can force major change on this team.

channtheman
11-19-2017, 04:05 PM
I'm counting on it. That may be the only thing that can force major change on this team.

These stinkers at Lambeau can't be helping either. The fans can't possibly enjoy or put up with sitting through shutouts by bad teams in cold weather.

red
11-19-2017, 05:06 PM
its funny, at the bye week we thought we had 3 winnable games left without a-rod

we squeaked out one against the bears got blown away by the ravens, and now the browns game could go either way with the way we are playing

and these are against 3 of the 4 or 5 of the worst teams in the nfl

gbgary
11-19-2017, 05:25 PM
may be the only thing that can force major change on this team.

yup.

mraynrand
11-19-2017, 07:39 PM
I rest my case.

Well reasoned. Thorough. You are at the pinnacle of your talents.

call_me_ishmael
11-19-2017, 10:45 PM
The Ravens are not that bad. Forget about the record. They have a top 3 coach in the NFL? Does anyone dispute this? They have a solid defense. Now that Flacco is back, they have a top 10ish QB too. They're a pretty decent team when healthy.

bobblehead
11-20-2017, 09:07 AM
The Ravens are not that bad. Forget about the record. They have a top 3 coach in the NFL? Does anyone dispute this? They have a solid defense. Now that Flacco is back, they have a top 10ish QB too. They're a pretty decent team when healthy.

I agree they are not as bad as advertised. I think they shut out the Bengals week one didn't they? Still, Hundley had very few bright spots. He was so bad the D wore down. Mays didn't help matters. Injuries continue to put guys into are lineup who barely belong in the NFL at this point. If Hundley could have sustained just a few drives to rest the D things could have gone very different....but he did not.

denverYooper
11-20-2017, 02:38 PM
I agree they are not as bad as advertised. I think they shut out the Bengals week one didn't they? Still, Hundley had very few bright spots. He was so bad the D wore down. Mays didn't help matters. Injuries continue to put guys into are lineup who barely belong in the NFL at this point. If Hundley could have sustained just a few drives to rest the D things could have gone very different....but he did not.

They now have 3 shutouts this year and are the 3rd best scoring defense in the NFL.

There was talk early in the year about how they might be an all-time great defense but that has since fallen off, though they are still very good.

woodbuck27
11-24-2017, 01:14 PM
I'm counting on it. That may be the only thing that can force major change on this team.

http://inductivebiblestudyapp.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/3.png

That's ALL we have left.

woodbuck27
11-24-2017, 01:21 PM
https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=9G8YWub-GpKRjwT-44G4CQ&q=Packers+schedule&oq=Packers+schedule&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.2819.8100.0.8959.16.11.0.5.5.0.102.838. 10j1.11.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.16.909...0i131k1j0i131i46k1j46i131k1.0.qS_y0 ozcHBA#sie=m;/x/327d3mvgwb8t;6;/m/059yj;dt;fp;1

The battle of the Green at Brown.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.3236969.1497114614!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_750/obit-adam-west.jpg

" Holy rotten Mackeral Batman ! "

Vincenzo
12-10-2017, 12:49 AM
A loss today and change is very-very close.

mraynrand
12-10-2017, 06:52 AM
A loss today and change is very-very close.

Yep. TT and Stubby's jobs are on the line today. Lose and they're fired for sure.

oldbutnotdeadyet
12-10-2017, 07:23 AM
Yep. TT and Stubby's jobs are on the line today. Lose and they're fired for sure.

Ha! I'll believe it when I see it. The current coaches have been given a lifetime free pass due to the packer organization having the once in several lifetime luck of having two pro bowl quarterbacks back to back. It would take a literal act of god to get anybody fired.

I have resigned myself to not living to see another superbowl, or worse yet, living thru another 1970's 1980's packer death dynasty....

Ok, I feel better now....

mraynrand
12-10-2017, 07:31 AM
Ha! I'll believe it when I see it. The current coaches have been given a lifetime free pass due to the packer organization having the once in several lifetime luck of having two pro bowl quarterbacks back to back. It would take a literal act of god to get anybody fired.

I have resigned myself to not living to see another superbowl, or worse yet, living thru another 1970's 1980's packer death dynasty....

Ok, I feel better now....

I know, it's just miserable isn't it? Other teams don't have to put up with this shit. They fire people!

Pugger
12-10-2017, 09:42 AM
Yep. TT and Stubby's jobs are on the line today. Lose and they're fired for sure.

That' a real knee slapper.

Pugger
12-10-2017, 09:43 AM
I know, it's just miserable isn't it? Other teams don't have to put up with this shit. They fire people!

And that's why they keep losing.

mraynrand
12-10-2017, 09:48 AM
That' a real knee slapper.

I know. I need to hire new writers.

red
12-10-2017, 09:50 AM
no ones getting fired if we lose to day, if a-rod comes back next week, we'll probably end up with 9 wins

so even though the whole world has now seen how poor of a team we are without a-rod saving the day, nothing will change

Pugger
12-10-2017, 11:19 AM
no ones getting fired if we lose to day, if a-rod comes back next week, we'll probably end up with 9 wins

so even though the whole world has now seen how poor of a team we are without a-rod saving the day, nothing will change

We aren't the only team that would suffer without their starting QB. If Atlanta or Seattle lost their starter for half the season they would suck too.

red
12-10-2017, 11:54 AM
We aren't the only team that would suffer without their starting QB. If Atlanta or Seattle lost their starter for half the season they would suck too.

no, they wouldn't, and thats the whole point

we were a super bowl contender with a-rod, and a bottom 5 team without him

other teams have lost their starting Qb's and have not fallen that far

hell look at the vikings

George Cumby
12-10-2017, 11:57 AM
I rest my case.

Man up, Nancy.

George Cumby
12-10-2017, 03:47 PM
You were right. The Packers did lose to Cleveland. Fire M3! Fire TT!

esoxx
12-10-2017, 04:11 PM
Man up, Nancy.

I prefer the term, "Man up, Sally."

denverYooper
12-10-2017, 04:14 PM
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/0f/62/28/0f622811cf02a51e26d767dcec555027.jpg

denverYooper
12-10-2017, 04:15 PM
http://memecrunch.com/meme/2IUYL/you-re-wrong/image.jpg

denverYooper
12-10-2017, 04:22 PM
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/Philosophy/Debating/funny-pictures-owl-wrong.jpg

Fritz
12-10-2017, 04:31 PM
Well...they won. Nobody's getting fired today. Maybe fired up, but not fired.

Harlan Huckleby
12-10-2017, 04:32 PM
Whoever started this thread came damn close to being right.

George Cumby
12-10-2017, 06:33 PM
Whoever started this thread came damn close to being right.

So? Horseshoes and hand grenades.

pbmax
12-10-2017, 07:31 PM
They don't ask how. They ask how many.

ZachMN
12-10-2017, 08:16 PM
Yeah I look like a fool cause we had to go to overtime against them to win.......a hand grenade would be good in two offices at 1265......

George Cumby
12-10-2017, 08:19 PM
Man up, Nancy.

ZachMN
12-10-2017, 08:20 PM
no, they wouldn't, and thats the whole point

we were a super bowl contender with a-rod, and a bottom 5 team without him

other teams have lost their starting Qb's and have not fallen that far

hell look at the vikings

all of the vikings 'backups' have significant starting exp. Hardly comparable to Hundley. However it points out the lack of scouting and talent evaluation and quite frankly the coaching once Prissy Aaron went down how far this team has fallen

Teamcheez1
12-10-2017, 08:20 PM
So we won against the lowly Browns. Big deal. If we somehow manage to grab the last playoff spot this year, we will limp into the playoffs and have another epic meltdown.

George Cumby
12-10-2017, 08:23 PM
Or you could be a Browns fan and not have sniffed the playoffs in how long? Christ what a bunch of entitled spoiled pussies you are ( sorry Pugger).

Bretsky
12-10-2017, 08:24 PM
We aren't the only team that would suffer without their starting QB. If Atlanta or Seattle lost their starter for half the season they would suck too.

Not Minnesota it appears

Joemailman
12-10-2017, 08:27 PM
Not Minnesota it appears

Minnesota is the rare case where a team got better by losing their starting QB. Bradford completed a lot of passes, but Keenum makes more big plays.

Maxie the Taxi
12-10-2017, 08:29 PM
Or you could be a Browns fan and not have sniffed the playoffs in how long? Christ what a bunch of entitled spoiled pussies you are ( sorry Pugger).Man up, Nancy.

mraynrand
12-10-2017, 08:52 PM
Or you could be a Browns fan and not have sniffed the playoffs in how long? Christ what a bunch of entitled spoiled pussies you are ( sorry Pugger).

+1

mraynrand
12-10-2017, 08:52 PM
Man up, Nancy.

Nance up, Manny

Pugger
12-11-2017, 12:19 AM
Or you could be a Browns fan and not have sniffed the playoffs in how long? Christ what a bunch of entitled spoiled pussies you are ( sorry Pugger).

Hey, no worries. I agree with you. This injury ravaged team with a skittish backup QB who can barely throw further than 10 yards, a green RT, lousy TEs, no pass rush and a beat up secondary with guys starting who belong on the practice squad gutted out a win on the road against a team trying to impress their new boss and save their jobs. This ain't college. You don't get extra credit for style points. Getting that W any way at all is all that matters.

Fritz
12-11-2017, 11:57 AM
And the best news of all . . . Montravius Adams played!!!

denverYooper
12-13-2017, 08:39 AM
Or you could be a Browns fan and not have sniffed the playoffs in how long? Christ what a bunch of entitled spoiled pussies you are ( sorry Pugger).

It's almost like the 70s and 80s never happened :).

As a parent of 2 elementary schoolers, this argument feels familiar: 'when I was your age, we were lucky to win 7 games a season", "our superbowl was a close game against the Lions", "10 win season? We didn't know what the hell that was'

denverYooper
12-13-2017, 08:58 AM
Yeah I look like a fool cause we had to go to overtime against them to win.......a hand grenade would be good in two offices at 1265......

I'm just having fun.

Props to you for having the stones to take a bold stance and to come back to own it.

woodbuck27
12-13-2017, 10:22 AM
Hey, no worries. I agree with you. This injury ravaged team with a skittish backup QB who can barely throw further than 10 yards, a green RT, lousy TEs, no pass rush and a beat up secondary with guys starting who belong on the practice squad gutted out a win on the road against a team trying to impress their new boss and save their jobs. This ain't college. You don't get extra credit for style points. Getting that W any way at all is all that matters.

That game went from:

http://hd.wallpaperswide.com/thumbs/stormy_sky-t2.jpg

TO:

https://ak1.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/25717361/thumb/1.jpg

With a huge Punt return by Trevor Davis setting up a chance in OT.

An ugly ugly Packer game somehow was meant to switch around. They got that all important 'W' as the bottom line.

GO PACK GO !

alquaal
12-13-2017, 10:39 AM
It's almost like the 70s and 80s never happened :).

As a parent of 2 elementary schoolers, this argument feels familiar: 'when I was your age, we were lucky to win 7 games a season", "our superbowl was a close game against the Lions", "10 win season? We didn't know what the hell that was'
Oh yeah, I remember those years well. Growing up in Ishpeming a Packer win against the Lions was as good as a Superbowl, since no one in their right mind ever believed the Packers would see a Superbowl in their lifetime.

woodbuck27
12-13-2017, 11:45 AM
Oh yeah, I remember those years well. Growing up in Ishpeming a Packer win against the Lions was as good as a Superbowl, since no one in their right mind ever believed the Packers would see a Superbowl in their lifetime.

It was a long rough ride between Starr and Favre for us long term Packer fans.

Damn ! :whaa:

channtheman
12-13-2017, 11:46 PM
I've been fortunate to only experience 2 losing seasons since I started watching the Packers "full time" in 2000. 4-12 with Favre in 2006? And then 6-10 with Rodgers first year. Those years sucked, except early on in the season you knew the playoffs were out of the question and the losses didn't hurt as bad.

I want to go to the playoffs every year, even if that means a worse draft pick and coaches keeping their jobs, because at the end of the day, anything can happen once the playoffs start and I'd rather still be watching football in January and February. Never assume that next year we'll be better than this year. Look at Dallas. From number 1 to middle of the pack and probably won't even make the playoffs. Lots of talk after they lost to us last year that "It's ok cause they'll be back next year." Well, right now it doesn't look ok and it doesn't look like they'll be back. Don't take THIS season for granted.

Besides, other than the Patriots, we are as good as just about anyone over the last 25 years. And if you are measuring success based on if we are as good as the greatest HC/GM of all time in Bill Belichick well... I can't help you there.

Pugger
12-14-2017, 08:30 AM
It's almost like the 70s and 80s never happened :).

As a parent of 2 elementary schoolers, this argument feels familiar: 'when I was your age, we were lucky to win 7 games a season", "our superbowl was a close game against the Lions", "10 win season? We didn't know what the hell that was'

I endured those dark times. And we were lucky to go .500. Between 1968 and 1992 we made the playoffs a grand total of 2 times. :sad:

beveaux1
12-14-2017, 10:34 AM
I endured those dark times. And we were lucky to go .500. Between 1968 and 1992 we made the playoffs a grand total of 2 times. :sad:

Post-Rodgers, if we don't have someone in place to draft and develop a new franchise QB, I fear we'll replay those years.

Freak Out
12-14-2017, 12:20 PM
I endured those dark times. And we were lucky to go .500. Between 1968 and 1992 we made the playoffs a grand total of 2 times. :sad:

They were dark times but I loved watching Dickey and company play.

gbgary
12-14-2017, 12:31 PM
They were dark times but I loved watching Dickey and company play.

that offence was pretty special. Dickey, Lofton, Jefferson, and Coffman were the Pro Bowl starters one year.

Pugger
12-14-2017, 03:07 PM
They were dark times but I loved watching Dickey and company play.

Yes, that offense was special. The defenses back then make ours today look like the 85 Bears.

George Cumby
12-14-2017, 04:59 PM
I endured those dark times. And we were lucky to go .500. Between 1968 and 1992 we made the playoffs a grand total of 2 times. :sad:

As did I. That’s why I chose the username I did as a constant reminder to enjoy these halcyon days.