PDA

View Full Version : Davis = New Breed of TE



Deputy Nutz
04-23-2006, 09:47 PM
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/9388627

http://images.sportsline.com/u/photos/football/nfl/img9388626.jpg
Vernon Davis exemplifies the new breed of TEs. Half WR, half freak of nature. (Getty Images)

Hybrid tight ends a coveted prize in '06 draft
April 21, 2006
By Pete Prisco
CBS SportsLine.com Senior Writer
Tell Pete your opinion!

Some NFL people used to wonder why they bothered with a tight end. After all, when he was on the field, he was usually the worst eligible receiver, and he was almost always the worst blocker on the line.

So why not just play a third receiver on passing downs and an extra tackle on run downs?

That thinking is gone.

The new breed of tight end, the guy who can stretch the middle of the field and take the pressure off the outside receivers, has amended it.

This new breed is athletic, long, fast and can catch. They're guys like San Diego's Antonio Gates and Baltimore's Todd Heap.

Coaches love them, quarterbacks rely on them, and defensive coordinators despise them.

That's why this year's draft class of tight ends is so exciting for coaches and front-office personnel. It's loaded, featuring a lot of this new-breed player who is far more receiver than blocker.

"There are a lot of teams going to get starting tight ends from this draft," said an AFC offensive coordinator. "And the thing is, they catch passes like receivers. It's not a good class of wide receivers, but it is for tight ends."

Maryland's Vernon Davis is the headliner. At 6-feet-3, 250 pounds, he wowed the scouts at league combine when he ran the 40 in 4.38, which is wide receiver speed. He also bench-pressed 225 a whopping 33 times.

Run like a receiver, strong like a lineman.

Welcome to the modern tight end.

"That guy is a freak," said one NFC scout.

He's not alone. As many as six or seven tight ends could be off the board in the first two rounds. Last year, there was one taken in the first two rounds: Heath Miller by the Pittsburgh Steelers with the 30th overall pick.

In 2004, four tight ends went in the first two rounds with Cleveland using the sixth overall pick on Miami's Kellen Winslow. His career has been marred by injuries, but he has that talent to be an elite player. New England used a first-round pick that year on Ben Watson, who is developing into a big-play tight end.

"People see what the tight ends can do for your offense, so we're all looking for them," said the AFC coordinator.

What they do is become security blankets of sorts for their quarterbacks, a go-to guy in a tough situation, a safety valve when the protection starts to break down.

"That's the one thing about Drew Brees when he was with the Chargers," said another AFC offensive coordinator. "You don't know how much of his success came because he had that tight end he could always count on."

Creating mismatches has always been key for an offensive coordinator, and a tight end like Gates, Heap or Kansas City's Tony Gonzalez allows him to do that. Those players are tough covers for a linebacker or a safety, which is why they are usually doubled. That, in turn, helps opens things up for the receivers outside.

After Davis, the next group of tight ends in this class consists of UCLA's Marcedes Lewis and Georgia's Leonard Pope. Both are tall for the position, Lewis at 6-6½ and Pope nearly 6-7. Both play at around 260.

Lewis isn't as fast on the clock as some of the others, but he plays faster than his 40 times of 4.75. He won the John Mackey Award last year as the nation's best tight end, catching 58 passes, 10 for touchdowns. UCLA used him split out a lot, which allowed him to win mismatches with smaller defenders, particularly in the red zone.

Pope was used more as an in-line tight end at Georgia, although scouts don't think he will have a problem adjusting if a team wants to flex him off the line. He doesn't have blazing speed, either, but his 4.6 is a little better than Lewis.

The knock on all three of the top tight ends is their ability to block. Can they become good at it? Davis spent time at Maryland banging helmets with linebacker Shawne Merriman, a teammate who went on to be the Defensive Rookie of the Year for the San Diego Chargers last year, which should help his blocking ability.

"He got me better and I got him better," Davis said at the combine.

Pope and Lewis will fight the knock that their height will cause leverage problems. Good blocking usually means getting under an opponent. At nearly 6-7, that can be tough.

Some scouts have expressed that concern, which is why teams that draft those two might need some extra time working the blocking side of things.

A handful of the other tight ends who could go in the first two rounds: Colorado's Joe Klopfenstein, Notre Dame's Anthony Fasano, Western Michigan's Tony Scheffler and USC's Dominique Byrd.

With more teams looking to create mismatches in the passing game and find quality security blankets for their quarterbacks, these guys should all be gone by the third round -- many more for their receiving skills than what they can do as a blocker.

That's OK, too. Gates, Heap and Tony Gonzalez aren't notable for their blocking ability. It's their ability to get into the seam in the middle of the field and create troubles for a defense that makes them special.

There is no glitz or glamour in blocking, which is why we love this new breed, because in the end, it's another move toward more passing, and who doesn't like that?

swede
04-23-2006, 10:23 PM
I have seen some of the film. I'm not sold on this guy anymore. I admit I got a little excited when I heard the talk but I am starting to think that this guy will be a really good tight end but he will be LUCKY to be as good as someone like Gonzalez. We've seen this kid before and his name was Shannon Sharpe.

Yadda yadda yadda. AJ HAwk at #5 is the surest of all sure things.

Joemailman
04-23-2006, 10:45 PM
Davis would create all kinds of matchup problems for defenses. Force safeties to worry about him down the middle, and the slant patterns to wide receivers become much more effective. Hawk is great though, and probably brings more intangibles than any other top player.

swede
04-23-2006, 10:58 PM
Davis would create all kinds of matchup problems for defenses. Force safeties to worry about him down the middle, and the slant patterns to wide receivers become much more effective. Hawk is great though, and probably brings more intangibles than any other top player.

JoeMailman! I loved your old avatar! To me you were one of JSO's worthiest voices and one of the most missed here. Welcome to Packer Rats!

Since you seem willing to stand up for Davis...

I watched some of the tape on him and for a guy that was supposedly so fast and strong he didn't seem to play fast or strong. He was always in traffic, jumping up and falling down, or getting hauled down by his jersey. Are you listening to the talkers or ahve you seen things with your eyes that you like about Vernon Davis?

RashanGary
04-23-2006, 11:08 PM
We could line Davis up at DE for 5 plays per game and he'd probably rack up 10 sacks per season.

Partial
04-23-2006, 11:28 PM
you're crazy collins. I don't know why you're still overhyping this guy. Line this guy up on defense and all that you have is a 200 yard opposite rushing game with zero sacks and zero tackles.

RashanGary
04-23-2006, 11:34 PM
Does Partial indicate your brain capacity?

I said 5 plays per game. I thought most of our non-retarded posters could figure it would be 3rd and long situations. Sorry, I over estimated your intelligence.

Joemailman
04-23-2006, 11:37 PM
Swede,

I don't get to see much college football except for New Years week bowls so I haven't seen Davis. I'm just going by what I've read on numerous websites. I must admit taking a TE at #5 makes me a little nervous because of past TE busts, but I'm intrigued by his potential. Davis, Mario or Hawk would all be great picks at #5.

Partial
04-23-2006, 11:45 PM
If he's in on third and long, teams will run at him and get the first down every time. This guy is incredibly overrated.

RashanGary
04-23-2006, 11:50 PM
Partial,

You keep insisting Lewis is a better player than Davis. Would you care to put your money where your big mouth is. I'd put $500 dollars on mine. Interested?

Partial
04-23-2006, 11:54 PM
I said that once.

I simply think Davis is overrated as hell. I don't have 500 dollars to bet. 5 years from now when you can finally make an accurate statement of this, I am willing to bet we'll both have long since forgotten so thats not too wise in my mind.

V-Davis = most overhyped player in the draft by a land slide.

RashanGary
04-24-2006, 12:03 AM
We'll see Partial. I like your guy too. No matter what happens on draft day I have confidnece in Thompson and I really we will get the best player.

Partial
04-24-2006, 12:09 AM
as do I. I think he'll take Young if he's there. He is the best prospect available. I hope he'll take Hawk, though, as he is an all-around great player with a great attitude that the defense needs.

RashanGary
04-24-2006, 12:18 AM
We're all fans who know more than the causual watcher based on how much damn time we spend researching this crap but when it comes to top prospects it is easy to see who's great but hard to split hairs and say who's greater than who. I know some things but when it gets down the the little details like who's #5 and who's #6 I have a hard time splitting that hair.

RashanGary
04-24-2006, 12:20 AM
I've been getting that feeling Young could be the pick too.

Tarlam!
04-24-2006, 05:34 AM
I don't think he's as hot for young as other teams. If Y>oung is still on the board, TT will trade outta 5. There's another thread in here where that's being speculated and I tend to like the talk!

I would be happy if we got Davis. In fact, the only guy I see as problematic is Brick. But heck, if Tausch or Clifton cop an injury, he'd be great to have around!

billy_oliver880
04-24-2006, 09:16 AM
V-Davis = most overhyped player in the draft by a land slide.

I think Mario is the most overhyped. Seems like these guys that are physical specimens really get alot of talk. Even if their stats aren't that great.