View Full Version : kYLE bRADY signs with the Pats
b bulldog
03-03-2007, 11:00 AM
gOOD SECOND STRING te
Charles Woodson
03-03-2007, 11:02 AM
Just curious why do you use caps?
PaCkFan_n_MD
03-03-2007, 11:50 AM
Looks like once again the pats will be there come playoff time. Already two good pick ups, and they still have two 1st and a 2nd to add to the team. They need WRs and they can add two stars if they want in the draft. Also, probably the best QB and coach in the league. Great time if your a pats fan.
esoxx
03-03-2007, 11:57 AM
I'm surprised a team as widely praised for brillance as the Pats would be so "stupid" as to jump into free agency from the onset.
They sure don't know what they're doing. :roll:
BooHoo
03-03-2007, 01:34 PM
Maybe that is their way of doing business. Identify only a couple of FAs that could help their team and sign them early before anyone else does.
HarveyWallbangers
03-03-2007, 01:40 PM
Kyle Brady? Hardly think he matters. He's like 35 or 36 years old, and all he does is block. He's a poor man's Jimmy Kleinsasser.
BooHoo
03-03-2007, 01:42 PM
Evidently, they figured he had some mileage left in him or they wouldn't have signed him.
gbpackfan
03-03-2007, 04:18 PM
Brady is WAY past his prime. He is pretty much a 3rd stringer.
b bulldog
03-03-2007, 07:55 PM
Good run blocker who gives them more beef up front on running plays, that is about all he is.
BooHoo
03-03-2007, 08:05 PM
Maybe that is all they want him for. They seem to be pretty successful for the past few years.
OS PA
03-03-2007, 08:12 PM
Just curious why do you use caps?
sEEMS LIKE HE ACCIDENTLY HAD caps ON. :lol: :lol: :lol:
b bulldog
03-03-2007, 08:20 PM
I answered that question in another thread but the above post nailed it and also that my typing skills are very bad but I'm going to give my best to avoid these mishaps :oops:
Charles Woodson
03-03-2007, 08:21 PM
[quote="b bulldog"]I answered that question in another thread but the above post nailed it and also that my typing skills are very bad but I'm going to give my best to avoid these mishaps :oops:[/quote
haha na i was just curious if you do it to catch peoples attention
the_idle_threat
03-03-2007, 08:22 PM
All they needed to do was replace Daniel Graham, who was their blocking tight end. Mission accomplished, and relatively cheap.
They have Ben Watson as the downfield threat. It's an embarrassment of riches.
b bulldog
03-03-2007, 10:51 PM
I still wish we would have drafted Watson two years ago.
BallHawk
03-03-2007, 10:53 PM
I answered that question in another thread but the above post nailed it and also that my typing skills are very bad but I'm going to give my best to avoid these mishaps :oops:
I've got a copy of Mavis Beacon, if you want it. :wink:
b bulldog
03-03-2007, 10:54 PM
My skills make me day to day but aren't we all!
swede
03-03-2007, 10:56 PM
I answered that question in another thread but the above post nailed it and also that my typing skills are very bad but I'm going to give my best to avoid these mishaps :oops:
I've got a copy of Mavis Beacon, if you want it. :wink:
mEAVIS bACON? WTF IS THAT??
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.