View Full Version : Packers Have discussions with Travis Henry
retailguy
03-03-2007, 09:51 PM
Packers | Team has had discussions with T. Henry
Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:36:47 -0800
Len Pasquarelli, of ESPN.com, reports the Green Bay Packers have had discussions with free agent RB Travis Henry (Titans).
Per KFFL
BallHawk
03-03-2007, 09:52 PM
If we can't get Green, this is the guy I'd want.
retailguy
03-03-2007, 09:56 PM
At least he's calling SOMEBODY.... :roll:
Bretsky
03-03-2007, 09:57 PM
Packers | Team has had discussions with T. Henry
Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:36:47 -0800
Len Pasquarelli, of ESPN.com, reports the Green Bay Packers have had discussions with free agent RB Travis Henry (Titans).
Per KFFL
INTERESTING
This excites me; not as much Henry specifically. But they are at least in discussions with free agents :glug: :glug: :glug: :glug: :glug:
I would love to have Travis Henry.
RashanGary
03-03-2007, 10:06 PM
I would love to have Travis Henry.
I agree. He was really good before he got into trouble. He's a younger, trougbled Ahman Green.
Bretsky
03-03-2007, 10:11 PM
I would love to have Travis Henry.
I agree. He was really good before he got into trouble. He's a younger, trougbled Ahman Green.
If I'm not mistaken he's a decent receiving back as well.
gbpackfan
03-03-2007, 10:23 PM
The MJS reports the same thing. However, the Packers are waiting to see what happens with Green before they make an offer to Henry. Don't be surprised if Denver signs Henry ASAP.
Bretsky
03-03-2007, 10:36 PM
Broncos
Packers
Raiders
Texans
PER KFFL all of those teams have had discussions with Travis Henry
MTPackerfan
03-03-2007, 10:42 PM
Henry wouldn't be a bad back to get, Had some pretty good years with buffalo
PaCkFan_n_MD
03-04-2007, 08:44 AM
I'd still rather have green.
Joemailman
03-04-2007, 09:20 AM
Henry rushed for over 1200 yards in 2006 despite missing 2 games. The case against him is that he was suspended 4 games in 2005 for substance abuse. I imagine any contract would probably have a "good behavior" clause.
Guiness
03-04-2007, 12:39 PM
I agree. He was really good before he got into trouble. He's a younger, trougbled Ahman Green.
Everyone always forgets that Green isn't that old, cause it seems like he's been here forever.
Henry is indeed younger than Green. 4 months younger.
Green has been in the league longer (10 vs 7 years) and has the carries to go with it (1871 vs 1321) so I guess he's older in 'nfl years'.
The Shadow
03-04-2007, 12:41 PM
I would think that Ahman's nearness to becoming the alltime Packer rushing leader will play a part before all is said & done.
GrnBay007
03-04-2007, 12:52 PM
I would think that Ahman's nearness to becoming the alltime Packer rushing leader will play a part before all is said & done.
just 45 yards short of an all time Packer record, right? It's only right he get this.....................................SIGN HIM TT!!
RashanGary
03-04-2007, 12:54 PM
I kind of second guessed it before I posted it Guiness but I though "Henry can't be the same age as Green"
To be honest, I havn't seen him play in the last 2 years so I'm not too familiar with where he stacks. Green was a very good back but he did benefit from Favre and a top notch OL as well. I always considered Henry a similar back to Green in overall talent and on field effectiveness. If he's half the price, I would think Henry is the better option.
HarveyWallbangers
03-04-2007, 12:59 PM
Ahman in 2002-2004 was much better than Henry has ever been. That being said, at this time they are close to a wash. The downside of Henry is he fumbles even more than Ahman (once every 52 touches for Henry; once every 63 touches for Ahman).
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.