PDA

View Full Version : Skins looking to trade for "pass rusher"



packers11
05-07-2007, 04:59 PM
ESPN rumor central

Skins on the defensive
<May. 7> The Redskins, who did not draft a defensive lineman, will spend the summer searching for veteran pass-rushing help, according to Pro Football Weekly. Insiders say the Skins have called around to ask about any ends who might be available via trade.

KGB??? :wink: Can we get a first? haha

BallHawk
05-07-2007, 05:08 PM
I would say 3rd, at the most.

hurleyfan
05-07-2007, 05:12 PM
ESPN rumor central

Skins on the defensive
<May. 7> The Redskins, who did not draft a defensive lineman, will spend the summer searching for veteran pass-rushing help, according to Pro Football Weekly. Insiders say the Skins have called around to ask about any ends who might be available via trade.

KGB??? :wink: Can we get a first? haha

Did they call, or will they contact the Pack?

For who... maybe KGB ? He's carrying a pretty big contract for the 'Skins to absorb...

Brandon494
05-07-2007, 06:00 PM
Whats the rush to trade KGB? We have the cap room to keep him and by trading him then we are losing our best pass rusher. Plus its not like we have a lot of depth at DE.

hurleyfan
05-07-2007, 06:38 PM
Whats the rush to trade KGB? We have the cap room to keep him and by trading him then we are losing our best pass rusher. Plus its not like we have a lot of depth at DE.

Not sure what the "rush" is you refer to, just asking questions..

With KGB's move to a "passing down" player, the question is, do the Redskins come after him as a pass rush specialist... His history shows he is suspect as an every down defensive end, but the Packers are paying him "elite" defensive end dollars...

I think he is a very good situational player, has great speed, although only one true "move" up the field... cannot beat the good left tackles on a consistant basis, and I question if the Packers don't pass up a fairly decent trade offer for him.

mraynrand
05-07-2007, 06:50 PM
Could we trade 'em Jamal Reynolds for a 5th rounder. I bet we could sneak that by 'em. Snyder sees "1st round pick" and kinda loses it....

pittstang5
05-07-2007, 07:57 PM
Whats the rush to trade KGB? We have the cap room to keep him and by trading him then we are losing our best pass rusher. Plus its not like we have a lot of depth at DE.

It just seems likely that IF the Packers were interested in trading a DE, it would probably be KGB. He's getting older and his production has trailed off. Maybe only using him on passing downs will help.

retailguy
05-07-2007, 07:59 PM
Could we trade 'em Jamal Reynolds for a 5th rounder. I bet we could sneak that by 'em. Snyder sees "1st round pick" and kinda loses it....

Maybe we could "toss" in Tony Mandarich?

Scott Campbell
05-07-2007, 10:20 PM
Whats the rush to trade KGB? We have the cap room to keep him and by trading him then we are losing our best pass rusher. Plus its not like we have a lot of depth at DE.

It just seems likely that IF the Packers were interested in trading a DE, it would probably be KGB. He's getting older and his production has trailed off. Maybe only using him on passing downs will help.

Maybe his name recognition and status as a failed full time player, but effective part time player might garner some trade value. I'd do it for a 4th, as I don't place much value on guys who can't defend the run at all.

Zool
05-08-2007, 08:29 AM
Well, say one of our starting D's get hurt this year. Sure would be nice to have KGB as a replacement starter for a few games. Depth is huge.

Merlin
05-08-2007, 08:35 AM
I for one am not one of those people ready to through KGB under the bus. It wasn't his fault he was put into the role he was. I say give him this season to prove he can do it in situations like he used to. He sure looked a lot better at rushing the passer at the end of the season in 2006 when he was replaced as the fulltime DE by Jenkins.

Green Bud Packer
05-08-2007, 09:54 AM
if kgb would be traded and he agreed to a contract worth less than he's getting from the pack,would the pack be responsible for the difference in pay?

Lurker64
05-08-2007, 10:16 AM
Situational pass rushers are valuable in this league. I certainly wouldn't let KGB go for anything less than a second, and after draft day the price on these sorts of things goes up. If anybody is thinking of giving up KGB for a pittance, remember how much we paid for R-Kal Truluck.

swede
05-08-2007, 12:09 PM
...remember how much we paid for R-Kal Truluck.

Good times...good times.

woodbuck27
05-08-2007, 01:34 PM
KGB isn't going anywhere.

retailguy
05-08-2007, 01:36 PM
if kgb would be traded and he agreed to a contract worth less than he's getting from the pack,would the pack be responsible for the difference in pay?


No, just his unamortized signing bonus

Creepy
05-09-2007, 12:08 PM
The only way to do this would be a trade. So who does the Redskins have and are willing to part with to get KGB. They won't give us Cooly (TE) or Randle EL (WR/KR), or if they would GB should jump on it. We don't really need any oftheir defensive players or OL. The only two guys that Gb should be interested in the Redskins would not give up without an additional draft pick.

My proposal would be KGB and a 3d for Cooly. Now GB has the receiving TE they need and is alos a good blocker. It may sound a littl expensive, but it would greatly improve the offense.