PDA

View Full Version : Bear Kills 11 Year Old Utah Boy



Scott Campbell
07-06-2007, 05:55 PM
We camp up there all the time.

Authorities shoot to death bear that fatally mauled 11-year-old
By Nate Carlisle and Jason Bergreen
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 06/20/2007 02:40:45 PM MDT

Posted: 11:59 AM- AMERICAN FORK CANYON - The barking hounds told Luke Osborn the bear was near. After hours of trudging up and down a mountain, through thick forests and soft dirt, Osborn and his fellow hunters were closing in.
Then, 10 yards away, he could see five hounds snapping at the bear. Osborn, a federal predator-control hunter, raised his .243-caliber rifle and fired a round into the base of its neck.
With that, the hunt for Utah's first documented killer black bear was over.
The bear is believed to have dragged 11-year-old Samuel Ives from his tent about 11:10 p.m. Sunday. The boy's family - his mother, stepfather and a 6-year-old brother - heard the boy's scream "something's dragging me" and rushed to help, but he and his sleeping bag were already gone.
His family thought the boy was abducted because the tear in the tent was so clean, said U.S. Forest Service officers. Wearing flip-flops and without a flashlight, the stepfather searched frantically for the boy and drove a mile down a dirt road to a developed campground.
"He was pounding on my trailer door. He said somebody cut his tent and took his son," John Sheely, host of the Timpooneke campground, told the Associated Press. Sheely alerted authorities by driving down the canyon to a pay phone.
It became clear there had been no kidnapping when searchers followed bear tracks into the forest and about 11:35 p.m. found the Samuel's remains - about 400 yards away from the family's shredded tent.
"The mother was broken up in tears and hanging onto to the other boy," Sheely said.
An Ives family spokesman, Brad Rawlins, said the family is still in shock. He declined to give any more details about Samuel or his family, other than to say they are from Utah County.
The campsite is approximately 11 miles up American Fork Canyon and two miles above the paved road from the Timpooneke campground - some distance away from the developed portion of the campground.
According to Scott Root, a manager for the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the bear likely was attracted to the campsite by food.
"He wasn't trying to get a kid; he probably smelled something" in the tent, on the boy's sleeping bag, or on the boy himself, Root said.
Still, it was the second attack Sunday in the same camping spot.
American Fork resident Jake Francom said a black bear swatted at his tent about 5:30 a.m. The bear hit him twice in the face through the tent wall before he woke up and realized what was happening.
"The first two [swats] were just kind of a feel," Francom said.
The bear struck again, hitting him in the head and knocking him to the ground. He said he felt the bear's claws.
"When he saw me move in there, he gave it hell," Francom said. "The sucker struck right through the tent and tore my pillow.
Francom yelled to his friend, "Troy, get your gun!"
Troy Strode woke, pulled a 9 mm handgun and shot into the air. The bear started running toward a hill about 50 yards away as Strode fired about six shots. Francom quickly put his girlfriend and Strode's girlfriend in his truck.
Then the bear returned to the crest of the hill. "It just stared at us for about 30 seconds," Francom said.
Francom's brother, Kip, threw rocks at the animal and it walked away.
Osborn, a wildlife specialist with Wildlife Services, and his dogs were dispatched to the mountain Sunday to search for the bear that attacked Francom.
But Osborn, who specializes in hunting bears and keeps nine trained hounds, could not find it and gave up after about five hours.
He and a small-legion of rangers and wildlife workers received another call again early Monday. They were told there had been another bear attack, but they didn't learn a boy had died until they arrived at the campground.
"There was a whole new meaning to this," Osborn said. A bear "killing a person is different. I've killed a lot for killing livestock. But [a bear's] killing a kid is a whole new program."
About 2 a.m., the first hounds began sniffing the attack site, then were let free. The hunters followed in the rugged, steep mountainsides and through dense trees and brush - all in the dark.
"You just kind of listen for the dogs and hope they're going in the right direction," said Chad Bettridge, a conservation officer for the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. In all, 27 dogs were used in the hunt.
The hunters said they were close to the bear several times, but their first strike against him came about 7 a.m. The bear was upright in a tree with dogs nipping just inches below him, Osborn said.
Then John Childs, a volunteer bear tracker, fired a .35-caliber Remington bullet into the bear's left shoulder. The bear dropped out of the tree and ran away, leaving a blood trail behind him.
About 8 a.m., the hunters could not hear the dogs and the hounds' radio collars indicated they were not moving. The hunters thought the bear might be dead and the hounds were sitting with him.
Then some hunters spotted the bear moving, and the chase resumed.
About 11:15 a.m. - nine hours into the search - the dogs had the bear cornered, on a slope with trees and brush so thick in places that the hunters could not see 3 feet in front of them.
But Osborn found a sight line and made his shot. When the bear fell, he began shouting "Yahoo!" The cheer echoed through the canyon. Osborn cheered again when a Utah Highway Patrol helicopter hoisted the bear out of the canyon.
Authorities confirmed later in the day that it was the same bear that attacked Samuel Ives, said DWR Director Jim Karpowitz, who declined to say how the confirmation was made.
Although they felt a sense of satisfaction for catching the bear, Osborn and the other hunters said they spent the chase thinking of the boy and his family.
"I don't think killing that bear will put [the family] at ease," Bettridge said. "Their loss is way too great. Killing that bear puts everybody else at ease."
Once the bear was hoisted away, the hunting party and dogs hiked some more. Getting off the mountainside required an hour hike down.
It was about 2 p.m. before the hunters returned to the road and could begin to rest.
Bettridge was one of the hunters who got a ride up the canyon to retrieve his truck. On the road, he passed bicyclists, campers and two women walking dogs. They smiled as Bettridge passed.
"Everything's back to normal," Bettridge said.
Though he was nearly mauled, Francom said he will return to American Fork Canyon. His family has been camping ithere since he was a kid and he goes up there to get away from the city several weekends a month.
Until Sunday, "I've never encountered a bear up there in my life."

BallHawk
07-06-2007, 06:10 PM
Bears are only going to come into a camp site if it's for food. They're far from being killers. They're curious, just like humans and just like animals. We have to remember, we're on their terrain.

Nonetheless, a sad story.

Freak Out
07-06-2007, 06:39 PM
A couple of Bears here in Anchorage (one brown and one black) have had to be killed so far this summer. One started chasing runners on the local trails and the young brownie lost it's fear of humans on the eastern edge of town and got put down. Bears that get used to camps and humans become very dangerous.

oregonpackfan
07-06-2007, 08:41 PM
One of my former third gradestudents was pulled out of his tent by a black bear in central Oregon last year.

The kid is now a 21 year old. I spoke to his father about the incident and the rarity of a black bear attacking a sleeping camper.

The dad told me how the game wardens determined how the "attack" took place.

The kid, of Anglo heritage, thought it was cool to grow his hair and braid it in the form of Jamaican dredlocks. In order to keep the dredlocks for Anglo hair, one has to soak it in salt water.

Apparently, the bear was attracted by the salt flavor lingering in the young man's hair. He began licking the hair of the sleeping youth.

When the youth woke up and struggled, it was then that the bear clamped down on the youth's head and dragged him out of the tent.

The kid escaped with some minor cuts that needed stitching.

I don't know if the authorities chose to track down the bear.

Little Whiskey
07-07-2007, 09:09 AM
another reason we need hunting season. keep em afraid of us!! never let them loose the fear :)

i've heard they remove the grizzly off the protected list in the lower 48. now there is talk of opening a hunting season. from what i've read the fee for the hunting tag is crazy expensive.

If some of our teenage thrill seeker really want to go out and get a thrill. Let them go up into the north west and let them tangle with a Grizzly bear...it will cleanse the soul

GBRulz
07-07-2007, 09:46 PM
I read about this, it happened like 3 weeks ago. The Grandfather was then complaining that there were no signs posted of an agressive bear in the area to warn people. I feel bad, but come on - you are in the wilderness at the top of a mountain. An encounter with wildlife is a good possibility.

Bears are becoming less afraid of humans because they associate us with food. People are careless when they camp by leaving food behind and not properly putting coolers, etc in their vehicles at night. The bears are just trying to survive. Hunting them is not the answer, educating people is.

the_idle_threat
07-07-2007, 10:53 PM
The Grandfather was then complaining that there were no signs posted of an agressive bear in the area to warn people.

What??? There are no warning labels on the bears???

This is the society we're becoming. Find somebody to blame. You are so right about education and responsibility, GBR. What is the alternative ... preemptively kill all potentially dangerous animals?

That being said, I don't see a problem with shooting one that is aggressive. I would definitely have some large-caliber bear medicine available and ready to be administered at high speed if I were out in the wilderness like that. Don't need to hunt them down, but if they're gonna be aggressive I'd wanna be prepared.

http://www.gunblast.com/images/Ruger-SRHAlaskan480/Mvc-102f.jpg
Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan .480 Ruger. Yes, this is probably overkill. :mrgreen:

oregonpackfan
07-08-2007, 07:16 PM
I am hardly an expert on handguns but wouldn't you lose a lot of accuracy firing a snub-nosed handgum like that one above? One would think you need a longer barrell for accuracy.

Any gun experts out there who have opinions on my question?

MJZiggy
07-08-2007, 07:58 PM
I don't know. I just thought it was kinda cute...

the_idle_threat
07-09-2007, 12:41 AM
I dunno if I'm an expert, but I've done a lot of shooting, almost exclusively with handguns. I'll give it a shot. :rs:

A short-barreled gun is harder to shoot accurately when you're firing at long range, like hunters do. At typical hunting ranges of 100 feet and often much more, the short sight radius (i.e. lining up the shot with a shorter rather than longer barrel), and lower velocity will sap accuracy. This is, I believe, why most places don't allow hunting with short-barreled pistols. I think WI requires a 5 1/2 barrel. The gun above has a 2.588 inch barrel. (Source: http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-SRHAlaskan480.htm)

***
Note: I did some research. WI allows licensed hunting for Deer and Bears with center-fire handguns of at least .22 cal :o and with barrels of at least 5 1/2 inches, measured from the firing pin to the end of the barrel. Using that method of measurement, the gun pictured above probably has almost a 5-inch barrel.

Sources:
http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/regs/Deer07regs2-17.pdf
and
http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/regs/07BearRegs.pdf

***

Defensive shooting is almost never done at long range (i.e. over 100 feet). For one thing, you have a hard time demonstrating that the danger was imminent and deadly force was necessary when you pick off the target from long distance. This is a wild-ass guess, but I'd say that most defensive shooting is done at a range of less than 30 feet, a range where most handguns---even those with short barrels---are plenty accurate enough for a capable shooter.

How accurate?

Guns much like the one above can be shot in 2-inch diameter groups at 75 feet by very capable shooters. See: http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-SRHAlaskan454.htm


Accuracy was very good with the Alaskan. I could keep six rounds inside of two inches at twenty-five yards, resting my wrists over a rail. The short sight radius made it harder to hit than with a longer barrel, but with the Mt. Baldy bullets loaded over Trail Boss, I could get the gun to group into one and three-quarters inches at twenty-five yards. If you are standing in the path of a large bear, wild boar, or even a mean bull, that is much more accuracy than you can use.

An average shooter should be able to put all 6 shots in a target the size of a dinner plate at 30 feet. That's plenty of accuracy and plenty of power to put 'em in the vital area of a bear and knock it on its ass.

Bottom line: If I were looking for a hunting handgun, where I expect to take long-range shots, I'd want a longer barrel. Short-barreled guns like the one above are designed for defensive shooting, and they're plenty accurate for that purpose.

oregonpackfan
07-09-2007, 12:58 PM
Thanks for the insight and info, Idle Threat.

the_idle_threat
07-09-2007, 03:36 PM
Anytime, OPF. Glad to offer an opinion. Of course, it's only worth what you paid for it. :mrgreen: