Bretsky
11-04-2007, 10:58 PM
Like LJ, Favre is moody, but he’s all about the team
The Packers probably didn’t have much of a choice. Tucked away in Green Bay, Wis., you don’t give up on Brett Favre. He’s all they have.
Still, today, with the Packers at 6-1, sitting atop the NFC North and coming off a stirring overtime victory on “Monday Night Football,” the decision to ride out Brett Favre’s bouts of retirement indecision and years of immature play seems brilliant and bold.
I’d have given up, traded Favre to the Dolphins or some other QB-starved squad and let him finish his career in a foreign uniform. It happened to Joe Montana. Why not Favre?
Well, there are two reasons: 1. Green Bay isn’t San Francisco; 2. Montana never had Favre’s physical tools.
God-given talent is hard to give up on. As proved by the rainbow he unspooled to Greg Jennings at Denver to win Monday’s contest, Favre still has one of the three strongest arms in football. He makes the Packers formidable.
Favre’s and the Packers’ resurgence explains Kansas City’s patient and tolerant approach with Larry Johnson. I’m not comparing Johnson to Favre. They’re not in the same class in terms of talent, production and poor behavior. Favre has LJ beat in talent and production. And LJ is way ahead of Favre in terms of being a locker-room cancer.
However, there is a comparison in terms of dealing with players who can be difficult and moody, especially when their teams are not winning.
Favre has contemplated retirement after each of the previous four seasons. He whined when the Packers didn’t make a strong play for Randy Moss. He broke an unspoken code among players, commenting on receiver Javon Walker’s contract negotiations. And, most troubling, he constantly threw the ball into traffic, believing his arm could fix any Green Bay problem.
Through it all, the Packers never blinked. They stood by their best player, waited out his indecision, selfish play and complaints.
Man, they look smart today.
Favre is the lone reason Herm Edwards and Gunther Cunningham didn’t sleep this week. Today, when the Chiefs and Packers meet at Arrowhead Stadium, Favre provides the Pack its only shot at victory.
It appears he’s in the middle of a magical season, a season that will make the “interception years” worth tolerating. He’s thrown 11 TDs and just six interceptions this season. Always one of the most passionate players in the league, Favre’s passion has energized the entire Green Bay locker room.
Guys love playing with and for Favre.
And that is the major difference between Favre and Larry Johnson.
Playing with Larry is a pain in the you-know-what. An NFL assistant coach — who has broken down film of the Chiefs — told me last week that Johnson’s refusal to block might haunt the Chiefs in free-agency.
“A free-agent quarterback would be a fool to sign with the Chiefs,” he explained.
Think about it. Suppose the Chiefs reach the end of the season and conclude that they need to upgrade at quarterback. Would a smart QB with multiple suitors choose to play in the same backfield with The Matador? Why take the risk?
I hope Larry Johnson takes the time today to take a look at the emotional lift Brett Favre gives his team. There’s nothing wrong with loving the game that made you rich and famous. When you do that, the game will love you back, even when you don’t deserve it.
To reach Jason Whitlock, call 816-234-4869 or send e-mail to jwhitlock@kcstar.com. For previous columns, go to KansasCity.com
The Packers probably didn’t have much of a choice. Tucked away in Green Bay, Wis., you don’t give up on Brett Favre. He’s all they have.
Still, today, with the Packers at 6-1, sitting atop the NFC North and coming off a stirring overtime victory on “Monday Night Football,” the decision to ride out Brett Favre’s bouts of retirement indecision and years of immature play seems brilliant and bold.
I’d have given up, traded Favre to the Dolphins or some other QB-starved squad and let him finish his career in a foreign uniform. It happened to Joe Montana. Why not Favre?
Well, there are two reasons: 1. Green Bay isn’t San Francisco; 2. Montana never had Favre’s physical tools.
God-given talent is hard to give up on. As proved by the rainbow he unspooled to Greg Jennings at Denver to win Monday’s contest, Favre still has one of the three strongest arms in football. He makes the Packers formidable.
Favre’s and the Packers’ resurgence explains Kansas City’s patient and tolerant approach with Larry Johnson. I’m not comparing Johnson to Favre. They’re not in the same class in terms of talent, production and poor behavior. Favre has LJ beat in talent and production. And LJ is way ahead of Favre in terms of being a locker-room cancer.
However, there is a comparison in terms of dealing with players who can be difficult and moody, especially when their teams are not winning.
Favre has contemplated retirement after each of the previous four seasons. He whined when the Packers didn’t make a strong play for Randy Moss. He broke an unspoken code among players, commenting on receiver Javon Walker’s contract negotiations. And, most troubling, he constantly threw the ball into traffic, believing his arm could fix any Green Bay problem.
Through it all, the Packers never blinked. They stood by their best player, waited out his indecision, selfish play and complaints.
Man, they look smart today.
Favre is the lone reason Herm Edwards and Gunther Cunningham didn’t sleep this week. Today, when the Chiefs and Packers meet at Arrowhead Stadium, Favre provides the Pack its only shot at victory.
It appears he’s in the middle of a magical season, a season that will make the “interception years” worth tolerating. He’s thrown 11 TDs and just six interceptions this season. Always one of the most passionate players in the league, Favre’s passion has energized the entire Green Bay locker room.
Guys love playing with and for Favre.
And that is the major difference between Favre and Larry Johnson.
Playing with Larry is a pain in the you-know-what. An NFL assistant coach — who has broken down film of the Chiefs — told me last week that Johnson’s refusal to block might haunt the Chiefs in free-agency.
“A free-agent quarterback would be a fool to sign with the Chiefs,” he explained.
Think about it. Suppose the Chiefs reach the end of the season and conclude that they need to upgrade at quarterback. Would a smart QB with multiple suitors choose to play in the same backfield with The Matador? Why take the risk?
I hope Larry Johnson takes the time today to take a look at the emotional lift Brett Favre gives his team. There’s nothing wrong with loving the game that made you rich and famous. When you do that, the game will love you back, even when you don’t deserve it.
To reach Jason Whitlock, call 816-234-4869 or send e-mail to jwhitlock@kcstar.com. For previous columns, go to KansasCity.com