hahahaha One of the "usual suspects" chimes in. How old were you during the Lombardi era? (negative numbers are acceptable)
HELL
Injury rates were higher back then.
sharpe1027 06-01-2024, 11:13 AMI can say personally, that's bullshit, the "eating right" thing. In addition to my own experience, though, I will cite the era of Max McGee,
texaspackerbacker 06-01-2024, 10:32 AMIf he would take 50 for 3 to 5 years then sign him. He won't. Its going to be 56 per and nearly impossible to move away from as most of it will be locked
bobblehead 06-01-2024, 08:34 AMDiet and daily routine plays a pretty big role in injury as well. Guys who don't eat right, and spend too much time on the couch playing video games
bobblehead 06-01-2024, 08:30 AMYou can turn that shit off. You don't have to be a slave to the idiotic algorithm.
MadScientist 06-01-2024, 12:22 AMMy feed on my work machine, using Microsoft Edge or whatever the fuck they call it now, is the absolute worst.
I open a tab and it's a never-ending
I think Reed might have the down field ability of Greg Jennings or Steve Smith Jr
Wicks is much more in the mold of your prototype #1 receiver.
The discouraging thing about Watson is he’s had quite the string of hammy issues. It’s starting to inch into Clay Matthews territory.
The idea of giving Love 40M guaranteed doesn’t seem realistic. They signed him to a 2 year deal last year that was essentially a 5th year option where
RashanGary 05-31-2024, 07:59 PMI voted yes on both, but without a whole lot of confidence. LUCK is the primary cause of injuries and thus could strike either or both again. The therapy
texaspackerbacker 05-31-2024, 07:21 PMWicks is the guy who had the highest ceiling. Watson is an elite deep threat, but he’s never going to be a guy who can get 7 yards on 3rd and 6 consistently.
King Friday 05-31-2024, 07:07 PMSure, but it's still just a game of chance, even for just one year.
They could have done nothing and not get injured or do all the right
Not expecting for no issues ever, the rest of their careers. Basically, last year Stokes contributed nothing, and Watson not much more. So I guess by
Patler 05-31-2024, 06:25 PMI don't think so. I believe teams have to spend at least 89% of the salary cap over a 4 year period. As long as that is happening, I don't think the union
Joemailman 05-31-2024, 05:41 PMLOL...the union would disown him if he signed that.
bobblehead 05-31-2024, 05:14 PMI think Stokes official time was only a 4.17. The rest is money in the bank though. And Fritz, we want pictures.
bobblehead 05-31-2024, 05:13 PMwell, if you are talking about the Rodgers contract I was firmly in favor of trading him to Denver for like 9 firsts or whatever. I just knew we weren't
bobblehead 05-31-2024, 05:10 PMI can't recall to be honest. I would say that given my disposition and nature I was....and for the same reasons. I also recall being one of his defenders
bobblehead 05-31-2024, 05:07 PM
Poll: Did UW fix Watson and/or Stokes?
You made the original statement. I have provided just as much evidence as you have.
sharpe1027 06-01-2024, 02:10 PM