I really don’t want to see AR leave. But a package w/ him and Bak and others - heck yeah
Printable View
I really don’t want to see AR leave. But a package w/ him and Bak and others - heck yeah
Since we have no new facts, we all just keep pitching possibilities out there. It's crazy but it's kinda fun. This one is interesting. I know very little about the Jets, so I don't know - what's their left tackle situation?
As for Rodgers going to San Fran, you'd think they might be a team who would want to give Rodgers a try for a year, except Trey Lance has been sitting for what, a year, or two, now? I don't know if they think he's ready or not. Purdy was kept on a tight leash, and that did hurt San Fran. I don't know if they think he can develop enough to take them all the way next year, either. You'd think for a one-year run, Rodgers might be the guy they want. But then you're putting both kids on the back burner for a year and also risking that Rodgers might, might want to play for two years - then what? I just don't think that's going to happen, and I don't think Green Bay wants to help SF load up, if that's what they do think it would be. I suppose with that San Fran offense Rodgers could be good - lots of toys there for him. But I still wonder if maybe he nixed SF not because GB wouldn't trade him there, but because either SF isn't interested or Rodgers doesn't like Shanahan.
This basically all but confirms he gone. It's an interview with Murphy.
https://twitter.com/TorresAdrianaTV/...11582615318530
A Google search suggested the Jets could use help at tackle.
I've never been a big fan of Bakhtiari, obviously, but their choosing to keep him it would seem makes the idea of keeping Rodgers more solid than ever.
Ya'all are taking what Murphy said as advancing your idiotic desire to get rid of Rodgers? That's not the way I heard it hahahaha.
Tex, you are not very bright. It was very clear in that interview that Rodgers is all but gone.
But go ahead and start the backtracking. This was what you wanted all along.
https://theathletic.com/4296705/2023...shared-article
Tex, Murphy spoke in past tense. Had and has mean different things in most of the world, like past and present.
Murphy talked about Rodgers like I talked about my uncle when he passed.
- Marcus Humphrey Murphy III, March 10th 2023.Quote:
Q: Is there a scenario where Aaron is still the starting QB of the Packers next season?
MURPHY: Yeah, I mean unless, if things don't work out the way we want them, yeah, we would. He is obviously a great player."
He gone.
I wonder if this is all so eerily similar that two years from now we'll get a picture of whomever Rodgers's current girlfriend is wearing a Vikings jersey that says "ThanksGuter."
It is a weird coincidence, this Jets thing. And I liked JoeM's suggestion that since #12 is retired in the Jets organization thanks to Broadway Joe, that Rodgers goes back to the number he wore at Butte Community College: #4.
The funniest thing of all would be if, after all this smoke and mirrors and speculation and hope, Rodgers just announced his retirement.
To me, that's the second-worst thing that could happen. If he retires, you get no compensation. And if he retires, you also have another agonizing two or three months wondering if he's going to change his mind.
The worst thing would be, to me, if he announced he wanted to play one more year, or gosh, maybe two, but only for the Packers. Then what do they do with Love?
I'll say this. If they DON'T trade him at this point Tex gets to gloat for at least a couple years.
What a horrible contract; and more classic that everybody seems to be waiting on Karen. You think he's trying to pull strings and get the Jets to trade for Bach too ?
Or is he enjoying kicking and squeezing Gute's ball to the point of tears just too much ???? lol
I wonder if he'll do his buddy Pat what's-his-name a favor and announce his decision on Tuesday on his show.
word is starting to come out that everything has been worked out between the jets and packers as to the trade deal
all thats left is for the giant drama queen to make a decision
https://twitter.com/Connor_J_Hughes/...531004421?s=20
I read that in two spots as well. Surprised ? Karen is consistent at least.
Tex , when this is annouced I'd like to offer you a 4 day Darkness retreat in my basement to cleans your thoughts and visualize what life will be like after Karen so you can get all kumbayoo and set your sould and all the spirts free.
Only $25,000 for you buddy; when you book for your coupon code just type in Karen :)))
This is from a site called Jetsxfactor:
To put it in the simplest terms, Rodgers would definitely have to agree upon alterations to his contract for a trade to be facilitated. As-is, Rodgers’ deal would create an untenable amount of dead money on the Packers’ cap sheet if he were traded without making changes to the contract. There needs to be a compromise found that works for all three parties: Rodgers, Green Bay, and the Jets.
New York obviously needs to take on some degree of Rodgers’ remaining money, but to what extent is something that can be negotiated between the Jets and the Packers, so this can certainly be something that is holding up the trade. Rodgers will also want to ensure the new contract terms are something he is on board for.
I would expect the framework for a deal was worked out when NYJ went out to California, they aren't going to go out there and have it leak if there hadn't been some discussions and agreement beforehand.
The latest reports make it sound like if Rodgers decides to come back this is a done deal. Stupid Mark Murphy's comments basically made it clear they'd take Rodgers back as a very last resort but it isn't what they want.
Legal tampering is Mar 13, and new league year starts 4pm Mar 15, I'm not sure they will trade him before then. I could see Rodgers making an appearance on McAfee and announcing his plans.
Trading AR brings a $40M cap hit for GB IIRC, that's for money they've already paid him that has been kicked forward. (bc you can always cook the cap) The Jets wont have that, but they will have to pay him the $58M bonus before Week 1. My guess is they'd like AR to play at least 2 years but he's noncommittal, which given he's been wishy washy about coming back - when asked at end of crushing season ending (playoff) losses- for a couple seasons in a row already. My understanding is if he plays 1 year he's a $60M QB, but maybe they can play around with his contract more easily because they don't have the cap issues from his previous contracts.
That's factually incorrect. If Rodgers retires,it's a 40 mil cap hit; same if he's traded. June 1st vs pre June 1st just spreads the hit out. The money is already paid. It's just cap hit and only 9 million more than what already counts against the cap.
NOW, the Jets may want to lower the 60 million cash he makes if he joins the Jets -- same as what Rodgers gets if he's cut by GB (now or after June 1). That's why the deal was so bad. You can spread it out, but 60 million is 60 million. Rodgers imo holds ALL the cards. That's why you hear Murphy saying saying he wants AR to go to the Jets (or retire). There is nothing GB can do about it as far as I can tell.
NYJ needed to do this to some extent anyway, but... they've just reworked contracts with Laken Tomlinson, DJ Reed and Tyler Conklin to free up $15.2 M in cap space.
Coincidence?
wonder if the two sides (jets and rodgers) would agree to tear up the old deal and do a new 2 year deal with like 35-40 million fully guaranteed this year (like salary and or roster bonus) and another 40 million dollar roster bonus if he plays next season?
something like that
we would still take our normal cap hit, but they wouldn't have to pay 60 million on week one
don't even know if thats possible or not
maybe they can get creative and give him a 10 million dollar salary plus a 100 million unlikely to be earned bonus if he can prove by the end of the year that ancient aliens built the stadium that the jets play in and that its actually a 20,000 year old power reactor
The 60 million isn’t that bad. If he retires he pays some back. If he plays it’s spread out.
No. If AR retires or is traded, GB doesn't pay him any more nor do they get a dime back. It's done. But, if it's before June 1, all the money paid (and scheduled to hit against cap in years ahead) counts against this year instead. The difference is 40 million instead of 31 presently. After June 1, more money would count against 2024 cap.
If he stays this year or is cut, GB owes him 60 million. That's money he has not been paid at all. That's why the Jets are gonna at least ask GB to pay some of his salary.
The only significance of June 1 is that some money counts against next year's cap. It really doesn't matter since books are easily cooked.
And some of ya'all actually think the Packers would be that ALL WORLD STUPID to basically pay the Jets to take Rodgers? Sheeeeesh. Does it not even occur to ya'all that the despicable shitheads of the media, mostly New York through and through, are conjuring up this idiocy that ya'all are swallowing?
Packers aren’t taking the salary. I agree. And I’d bet on it. But they do have to eat the 40 that’s already been paid and the Jets get a very reasonable deal (36 per year) the way it is right now. For whoever he’s traded to (most likely Jets), the contract is a bonus, not a hinderance. It’s less per year than Daniel Jones. Any money they give Rodgers (60M bonus in year 1) is spread over the rest of the contract. If he retires, some of it won’t count against the cap.