Ultimately, on paper, the Packers are better. Statistically etc.
Seattle really has no defense.
Printable View
Ultimately, on paper, the Packers are better. Statistically etc.
Seattle really has no defense.
Kinda surprised this has gone 20-0-2.
I think you can make a personnel case for Seattle being better, even if relative health has made it closer now that it was in September.
Someone wrote that people keep framing Seattle as thriving at 13-3 and the Packers struggling. Part of that is Rodgers being up and down. But injuries also influence it. But both teams specialize in winning close, 1-score games.
‘Good’ teams find ways to win...
I'd hate to see the Packers waste this season of good health. Seattle's pretty beat up, Green Bay is healthy.
I said even, but give a slight edge to Seattle because of Wilson over Rodgers.
Today? Packers. Full strength? It's close.