i would say below average. But I'll give um a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by beakerman
Printable View
i would say below average. But I'll give um a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by beakerman
Are you filling in for Wist in his absence?
DRiver is a gritty player. Those guys aren't gonna scare anybody.
The packers are really crappy on offense, as things appear right now.
Right now all these guys are just names on paper. I'm gonna wait and see what our new coaching staff can put together. The same players in a different system?? I have hope. And thats all I have right now. We can analyze these things to death... I think were gonna be a lot better than most think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
I agree Harlan,
You have Driver, who is an OK #1, but in reality belongs as an outstanding #2 WR. Then Gardner is IMO an average #3. Boerrighter is a #4, and Ferguson is dog crap as a WR...and I'm not talking Air Bud.
If they use the tightends more and actually run the ball it won't be too bad.
Keep in mind in 2002 they were decent despite no defense to speak of, and Driver and Ferguson carrying the load as receivers.
As long as 2 of the 3 backs stay healthy they'll be average on O. It's the D i'm worried about.
Defense and OL are my concerns. Honestly I'm not that concerned about the RB's, WR's, or TE's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Partial
the guards and Flannagan were a train wreck in 2005.
I'm gonna guess that the Oline will be better next fall. Klemm is mercifully moved to tackle, Flanny's replacement will be better, and Whittiker has no where to go but up.
I don't think Favre or Walker will be with the team.
Running backs will be better. Especially since we'll have some.
I don't know, very shakey situation on O, maybe they'll be a bit better than 2005.