Ok, once williams is gone, then it all comes down to, who do they want. I mean will the person they want last down to 8, if its hawk then no, maybe huff, and no for davisQuote:
Originally Posted by esoxx
Printable View
Ok, once williams is gone, then it all comes down to, who do they want. I mean will the person they want last down to 8, if its hawk then no, maybe huff, and no for davisQuote:
Originally Posted by esoxx
I think if Williams goes off the board early, TT will entertain trade down offers. That is, if he gets any, takes two to tango. Although I like Hawk as well, I don't see him tied to him necessarily if he can get more picks. Part of the reason being it's such a deep LB draft. Just never know what TT's going to do on draft day, other than he won't trade up and is fond of accumulating extra picks.
Yea i wouldnt mind trading down with the bills and gettting there 1st 2nd and 5 or 6th. all though thats a big reach.Quote:
Originally Posted by esoxx
i would be happy with a draft like this
1.Michael Huff
2.Best lb., carpenter whoever
2. Guard
Post this on another thread, but here's my mastery mockery of a draft for anyone who cares (2nd revision; the 1st revision had Pack trading the 1st, 3rd, and 5th rd picks to Chicago for Brain Urlacher). :smile:
Rd Pick
1 7th (obtained from Oakland, along with Randy Moss, for Javon Walker, the 5th overall pick and a 4th round pick and a 2007 conditional pick): Michael Huff, S, Texas
2 36th Cedric Griffin, CB, Texas
3 67th Taitusi Lutui, OG, USC
5 TBD Owens Daniels, TE, Wisconsin
5 165th Marcus Vick, QB/WR/KR/PR, Virginia Tech
7 253rd John Chick, LB, Utah State
Marcus Vick is a headcase that will likely turn into a team cancer if he ever gets drafted.
I like this draft, except for cedric griffin. I would rather us draft a linebacker there, and then especailly if we sign woodsen
This would be a horrible draft:Quote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
huff is not going to be anything special. Griffin at 36 would be a total waste and vick is just plain baaaaaaddddd.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparkey
Sparkey, not a big Texas fan huh?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhbJ7...Michael%20huff
Whatch that and tell me what you think.
I think if Vick gets his head straight, he'll be a good player like former Steelers Randle El. Randle El is more quick than fast and is a good NFL player; Vick is BOTH quick and fast and might be better than Randle El.Quote:
Originally Posted by MJZiggy
I dont think Pack would lose a whole lot if they drafted Vick in the 5th rd and he doesnt pan out cos of off field problems. Worth a shot, imo.
Awsome video, Nick. Huff hits like Roy Williams and covers like a CB. I think drafting Huff would allow Pack to use Collins in the box the way they did to with Butler and Sharper. Maybe its just me but im not sold on Maneul.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Barnett
Yeah, kinda remindes me of Sean TaylorQuote:
Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
I like Huff, but he is a safety and the Packers just spent money on a top ten free agent in Manuel. If Thompson had really targeted Huff, he wouldn't have signed Manuel to a 5 year 10 million dollar deal. It would be one thing if the deal was a short one or two years, but the front office fully expects Manuel and Collins to be the starting safeties. I wouldn't be sold on Huff playing corner.
Thompson really wants to upgrade the defense, and that both Williams and Hawk would surely help. I think if Thompson was sure that he could trade down and still land Hawk he would do it. Thompson wants to get out of the first round with either Hawk or Williams. To be honest the Green Bay scouting department had to liked what they saw with Williams at the combine, but they also have to be luke warm with his total body of work while at NC-St. Also, Thompson doesn't want to make the same mistake Wolf made, when he passed on Dan Morgan, and didn't do enough to move up and snag Urlacher. Hawk is a game breaker and game changer at linebacker, and for all that have been paying attention, the Packers still have several holes in the linebacker core, and Ben Taylor does little to fill those positions.
Manuel=Arturo Freeman. The only reason Manuel would probably make the team is because, unlike Freeman, Manuel is willing to take his and Thompsons sexual relationship to the next level.
nutz, I think that is being a little over-zealous calling manual a top-ten free agent.
I think he'll be solid, but I don't think he is a difference maker by any means
Mario
Polo!
Super Mario; Donkey Kong. Cool old time video gameQuote:
Originally Posted by b bulldog
I meant top ten at his position. Actually he was probably top 5 at his position in free agency.Quote:
Originally Posted by Partial
Sorry about the confusion, but you can't seriosly think that I would have meant top 10 overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutz
I've seen some football fans spit out some goofy shit in my day to justify the moves of their favorite team, you never know :mrgreen: