Monte Kiffin and Dick Jauron (under Forrest Gregg).
Printable View
Monte Kiffin and Dick Jauron (under Forrest Gregg).
Rodgers is #6 in NFL Top 100 (voted by players)
Here is the video. http://nfl.cpl.delvenetworks.com/pla...ce0bc4514687b2
After that, kinda ready for the regular season.
The Titletown District now has its own logo. And its boring.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDVqm7UWsAA9eI8.jpg:large
I'm glad MSPaint.exe is still seeing use, at least.
At least the W for the Badgers is in "motion" as well as having upward pointing arrows. And even that is barely enough.
Should just put Bucky on there.
Or this from a shirt I may have worn in college, my memory isn't clear.
https://img1.etsystatic.com/011/0/67...09413_tw6h.jpg
Isn't TT slang for something else? I guess if they put in a strip club, that would make some sense.
Let me stress, I bet both that the University no longer wants this shirt sold AND that they want their licensing fee from the guys making them.
In other words, keep your receipt.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/F-ck-Em-Buck...-/150670925238
Make 'em yourself.
http://www.cafepress.com/make/design-your-own
Can we stop reproducing that enormous image please? It is messing up the page.
I thought the TT stood for Ted Thompson. If the guy can get t he team another SB, they'll name a whole district after him, not just a street.
Ted Town.
As boring and plain jane as that logo is. it has to be inspired by Ted.
I'm sure anything Bill Belichek came up with would be much more exciting.
No links, just saw reference to this on Twitter. But Greg Jennings recently declared the problem in Green Bay was Mike McCarthy.
Didn't he just last year declare the problem was the WR that Rodgers wasn't as good as we thought and he no longer had WRs who could carry him?
Plenty of links now. http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news...119uez841ixsuj
When he was with the Pack I would never have figured Jennings for a back-stabbing turd.
Yeah, he seems capable of holding a grudge for quite a while. Maybe he too carries a certain chip on his shoulder? JSO should investigate.
I thought I remembered him trying to make amends for the sister thing, at least half-heartedly trying. But he's retired now, why should anyone care what he thinks about the Packers and McCarthy? I guess that is how the mediasphere (in which pro players are inevitably included) works: if you've retired and miss the attention you have to find something to say that will cause people to stop and take notice.
A tweet and an interview per year are two grains of sand in the desert. He might have sunken in the eyes of die-hard GBP fans whose radar screens snatch any and everything ever said about the Packers, but for the rest of the football world what he said about Rodgers and leadership is long forgotten. The statement about McCarthy will have a similar shelf life, or it has already been washed away from collective consciousness by the surprising news that Gisele and Tom finally got admitted into their hoity toity neighborhood country club (who would've thunk it!?!).
Gout removal??? If you have something about grout removal or gout extraction I might be interested.
No, that's not all he said, he said that McCarthy's supposed conservativism is the difference between Green Bay and New England, the difference in comparison to which every other difference is a difference without distinction. But is that really true? Which of the Packer playoff losses can be fairly attributed to McCarthy "not going for the jugular" when ahead? I can think of one example in which it could be argued that conservatism could be argued as the contributing factor to a loss. But there's a lot more to the story, don't you think? For one, there is the fact that the vast majority of playoff losses (six to be exact) did not happen because McCarthy took his foot off the gas--the Packers didn't even have 4th quarter leads in most if not all of them. But there's another piece too. I remember after the 2010-11 SB win Jennings was bemoaning what seemed like the offense's inability to seal the deal. He was speaking most immediately about the last 4th-quarter drive where GB had a chance to finish Pittsburgh off with a TD after they drove deep into Pitts territory but had to settle for three. But the wins at Philly and Chicago were also closer than they had to be. My question is, was it McCarthy's fault that the wins were a little too close for comfort because he took his foot off the gas? Or was it the offense's fault (failure to execute)? Or should we recognize, as the poster named Vince would say, that McCarthy's "conservative" strategy was actually successful in those games? The idea that McCarthy gets too conservative with the lead is based primarily on one disastrous playoff loss that does not guarantee its general validity.
As long as you turn it around (distinction without difference) I suppose that will be ok.
Do you think they know they have pictured Tretter?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFES13MXgAE4adI.jpg:large
Rob Demovsky @RobDemovsky 21h21 hours ago
The Packers will have a new director of player development after Rob Davis has left the organization, Packers... http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=2...916806379877-4
Ideal candidate: Greg Jennings. He seems to need something to do.Quote:
"We're in the search," Murphy said. "We hated to lose Rob, but [it is] a special opportunity for him." Davis' next venture has not been announced.