Clearly you don't listen to local sports radio Tex. Folks are sick of Rodgers.
Printable View
Clearly you don't listen to local sports radio Tex. Folks are sick of Rodgers.
I saw some online polls earlier that showed about 70% of Packer fans favor moving on from Rodgers. In face to face conversations with people I know, seems like everybody is in favor. Even people who have doubts about Love are in favor, either because they're tired of the drama queen act, or because of Rodgers' failures in January games.
70% seems right. There are a few Rodgers die hards but most of the comments are people sick of him.
YUP, I stuck with Sharon one year too late; I tried, but in the end the Karen Rodgers Media Whore pushing his agendas is just too much. And he sucks as a GM as well and is such a shitbag. Poll after poll after poll in WI show over 70 percent of Packer fans are mentally done with him, even if it means we lose more games.
I remember 20ish years ago you are I were fighting. I was pro Favre and you were pro Rodgers. Rodgers gave us some great years.
But he's changed.
Packers or Jets, one of them will be a winner with Rodgers for years to come, and one of them will play consistently losing football without him. So polls say 70% want to "move on" - to losing football? Uh yeah, I suppose that's believable, with some in here anyway.
Take you 70% figure for dumbassery as true; It seems like the level in here might be even higher than that hahahahaha. I hope ya'all enjoy watching losing football for years to come.
At least Bretsky and I can enjoy watching the Badgers win.
A good segment (even if not 70%) of fellow Packer fans are dumbasses and the Packers are guaranteed to lose because there is no possible way to field a winning team without Rodgers.
You offer a measured and thoughtful opinion and are very respectful of other's opinions, as always.
I don't see the connection. I'm not gonna comment on your literal post, as that would be the evil p word, and maybe get us both banned hahahaha.
I guess football must be different, though. Winning beats losing - what could be more good and normal than that?
As for people trying to stir up some sort of Favre vs. Rodgers thing, that's just stupid. They're BOTH Packer icons, one the GOAT, the other arguably the GOAT as of his time or damn close to it. No off-field crap can ever change that.
I'm not sick of him. I do think he is uninspired at this point and as such I want the team to move on. I recognize his greatness. That doesn't put him beyond criticism though. Love almost certainly won't be as good as Rodgers was. However at this point I don't think Rodgers, as a packer, had the fire to win an owl.
Football isn't like other jobs. Rodgers/Favre were closing in on 40 trying to get used to a new cast of 22-27 year olds each year. QBs simply have the ability to play longer so it presents a unique problem in the world of sports. Personally I get it. I have lifelong friends through school and work. I'm not overly interested in becoming besties with a new set of early 20 somethings.
Bobble, here's your new best friend!
https://media.istockphoto.com/id/103...DJZ4MIH5kx6kM=
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2...-new-york-jets
I have to think this is posturing to pressure NYJ into making a deal. Trading Rodgers to SF would be a surprise, that's for sure.
Very interesting all the same, but I think this goes on until just before the draft. Rodgers WILL get traded, I think that bridge has been crossed, but now it's possible that it might be to SF.
The supposed compensation - two thirds this year and a first next year - isn't all that much. But at some point, I'd be ready to take a bag of peanuts for the guy. Not yet though.