-
Representation without Taxation
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
-
I find those numbers quite interesting where did you find them?
-
I got the tidbit below in a email below. I usually do not read forwarded enails, but I thought the example below was funny....yet true. I just might try the experiement when I see an Obama supporter.
"Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed.
Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.
When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.
At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, bu t the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more. "
I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application. When people have it happen to them they don't like the idea as much anymore.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2007/...come-tax-data/
As of 2006 42.4% of households were not paying. According to that article in 1990 it was about 30%. Just curious as to where your info is coming from.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2007/...come-tax-data/
As of 2006 42.4% of households were not paying. According to that article in 1990 it was about 30%. Just curious as to where your info is coming from.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
I'm serious too. At the lower ends, through "tax credits" etc., individuals do NOT pay taxes. This is what we have been trying to say for weeks in this forum.
It's the essence of "redistribution."
The wealthy always pay more than their "fair" share. It's all numbers. You could make an argument that some hedge fund managers are paid in dividends (at 15%) instead of Ordinary Income.....but that type of issue is NEVER brought up. It's always just simply "it ain't fair" those poeple are rich.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
http://packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?t=14864
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
This funny, either you have to have no job, or you're too wealthy to pay taxes. When was the last time that you did your taxes? Maybe you should pay more attention, because I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney.
I would get a better accountant if I was you.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
I'm serious too. At the lower ends, through "tax credits" etc., individuals do NOT pay taxes. This is what we have been trying to say for weeks in this forum.
It's the essence of "redistribution".
So you think the working poor are not pulling their weight.
Have you ever talked to ANYBODY who is getting-by working low wage jobs?
I don't doubt that they pay little or no federal income taxes, although you neglect that they pay a huge percentage of their income on social security tax compared to people who have investment income.
Our economy is built on exploitation of people. Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living for one person, and can't possibly support a family. Often with no benefits.
Income is not being redistributed to the working poor. They are being allowed to keep enough money to survive so they can continue to serve you. And if they get seriously injured or ill, they are permanently indebted and fucked for this lifetime.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
*SIGH*
People earning the lowest incomes pay no taxes. Under the Bush tax cuts - that were for EVERY INCOME LEVEL, anywhere from 3-10 million people were taken off the tax rolls. The bottom tax bracket went from 15% to 10% tax rate on income. The richest income earners got a tax cut, but because the economy expanded and income increased for almost everyone, high income earners increased their income, and they ended up paying MORE taxes than before AT THE LOWER TAX RATE. This tax cut policy worked under Coolidge, Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush. Obama is going to reverse the tax cuts for the top income earners and give the money directly - in the form of a check - to those who don't pay any federal income tax.
Answer this question: If you pay zero tax on your income, is it in your interest to increase taxes or decrease them? If you will be getting a check due to increased taxes and getting more public services due to increased taxes, will you support the candidate promising to increase taxes, or the one proposing to decrease taxes?
Answer this question: Do higher taxes on businesses promote business expansion or discourage expansion? If taxes on businesses in the U.S. are higher than overseas, where would you choose to place your company if all other things are relatively equal - in a country with higher taxes or lower taxes? What happens to U.S. jobs when companies go overseas?
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
I'm serious too. At the lower ends, through "tax credits" etc., individuals do NOT pay taxes. This is what we have been trying to say for weeks in this forum.
It's the essence of "redistribution".
So you think the working poor are not pulling their weight.
Have you ever talked to ANYBODY who is getting-by working low wage jobs?
I don't doubt that they pay little or no federal income taxes, although you neglect that they pay a huge percentage of their income on social security tax compared to people who have investment income.
Our economy is built on exploitation of people. Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living for one person, and can't possibly support a family. Often with no benefits.
Income is not being redistributed to the working poor. They are being allowed to keep enough money to survive so they can continue to serve you. And if they get seriously injured or ill, they are permanently indebted and fucked for this lifetime.
different debate
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living for one person, and can't possibly support a family. Often with no benefits
How many? How old are they? How long have they been in those jobs? Will they be in those jobs forever? Why are they in those jobs? What will happen to those jobs when the taxes on their employers go up?
-
oh, so now I have to start reading these threads before commenting? forget it, buddy.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney..
I notified the IRS.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living for one person, and can't possibly support a family. Often with no benefits
How many? How old are they? How long have they been in those jobs? Will they be in those jobs forever? Why are they in those jobs? What will happen to those jobs when the taxes on their employers go up?
These questions are best answered by life experience, or at least talking to people, rather than theories about taxes and invisible hands and shrugging atlases.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living
http://wirelessdigest.typepad.com/ph...usegarth_1.jpg
Long hours! Bare subsistence! No benefits! No retirement! No vacation days! Low wages! No health care!
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living for one person, and can't possibly support a family. Often with no benefits
How many? How old are they? How long have they been in those jobs? Will they be in those jobs forever? Why are they in those jobs? What will happen to those jobs when the taxes on their employers go up?
These questions are best answered by life experience, or at least talking to people, rather than theories about taxes and invisible hands and shrugging atlases.
Well, then answer them. You seem to be in the know.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney..
I notified the IRS.
Wait until Scott Campbell reads this.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney..
I notified the IRS.
Wait until Scott Campbell reads this.
Is SC and IRS agent? Is he not paying taxes?
Anyway, I don't think it worked. The IRS called back and told me they have no record of a Mr. Nutz - but they wanted to talk to me.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
This funny, either you have to have no job, or you're too wealthy to pay taxes. When was the last time that you did your taxes?
Maybe you should pay more attention, because I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney.
I would get a better accountant if I was you.
Certainly seems unfair to me. You drive on roads? Your children get educated? You sleep at night, knowing our country is protected?
Why would you boast about not paying taxes?..........seems unpatriotic.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living
http://wirelessdigest.typepad.com/ph...usegarth_1.jpg
Long hours! Bare subsistence! No benefits! No retirement! No vacation days! Low wages! No health care!
That's right. Open your eyes.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesehead Craig
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2007/...come-tax-data/
As of 2006 42.4% of households were not paying. According to that article in 1990 it was about 30%. Just curious as to where your info is coming from.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/
Thanks for the link Howard!
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney..
I notified the IRS.
Just when you and I were getting back together, now this. FIRE UP THE BLENDER!!!!
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
This funny, either you have to have no job, or you're too wealthy to pay taxes. When was the last time that you did your taxes?
Maybe you should pay more attention, because I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney.
I would get a better accountant if I was you.
Certainly seems unfair to me. You drive on roads? Your children get educated? You sleep at night, knowing our country is protected?
Why would you boast about not paying taxes?..........seems unpatriotic.
Have you ever thought about how much you actually pay in taxes that don't come in the form of income tax? It is mind boggling and it will make you sick to your stomach. I pay property tax on two, count them two properties, that should more than take care of my children's educational needs, forget to mention if I send them to private school and then I get blasted with tuition for private school and I certainly can't turn off the tap to what the locals are charging me for public education even if I think it is below standard education for the money supposedly spent. Property tax also goes to fund my local police, fire, and sewer.
Do you want to get into sales tax and other cool things like energy tax, and gas tax?
Find anything you can do this day and age that doesn't require you to have or currently paying monies into the government, whether it is local, county, state, or federal.
When my government has 700 billion dollars to give away to the corrupt banking and investment sector then no, I don't feel unpatriotic, and I sleep just fine.
Besides the income tax is unconstitutional anyways.
what about tariffs. In every other country American goods are charged a tariff before they are even allowed to unload, but hell any damn country can bring their goods into our country and pay zero tariff. That begs a lot of questions. Free trade my ass, just as long as it is coming into the United States of America.
-
The only way to fix it is to bring it down and start over. Dust off the Guillotines and lets get to work.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak Out
The only way to fix it is to bring it down and start over. Dust off the Guillotines and lets get to work.
Do you think you may have the wrong country? Freedom! Equality! Fraternity! then, later, Napoleon!
Does anyone know what Jefferson originally had in place of 'pursuit of happiness'
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
Howard those stats are extremely biased. It should say did not pay any income tax to the federal government.
All wage earners pay payroll yax of 7.65% on there first $102,000 of income in 2008 after that it drops to 1.45%.
It also doesn't take into effect different segments of the business world. I have a client who usually makes $1,000,000 per year. Last year he lost $250,000 so would be classified as paying no taxes to the federal government. In fact, we completed a NOL Carryback and he received over a $60,000 refund. He still lives in his $3,000,000 house.
Then there is the gas tax that everyone with a car pays.
On top of that there is sales tax and property taxes that the state and municipalities collect.
I'm not sure what your point is but in the early 80s before the Reagan tax cut we had a 50% tax bracket and 83% of Americans were paying tax. Higher taxation led to more jobs and income to report on tax returns? :oops:
See how easy it is to manipulate statistics to say what you want.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living
http://wirelessdigest.typepad.com/ph...usegarth_1.jpg
Long hours! Bare subsistence! No benefits! No retirement! No vacation days! Low wages! No health care!
That's right. Open your eyes.
They are wide open and your comments are very revealing.
-
"There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better for worse as his portion; that though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried."
"But that which a man is, does always by necessity acquire, and what the man acquires, is permanent and living property, which does not wait the beck of rulers, or mobs, or revolutions, or fire, or storm, or bankruptcies, but perpetually renews itself wherever the man is put"
"A political victory, a rise of rents, the recovery of your sick or the return of your absent friend, or some other quite external event raises your spirits, and you think good days are preparing for you. Do not believe it. It can never be so. Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles."
- From Self Reliance
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by mraynrand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak Out
The only way to fix it is to bring it down and start over. Dust off the Guillotines and lets get to work.
Do you think you may have the wrong country? Freedom! Equality! Fraternity! then, later, Napoleon!
Does anyone know what Jefferson originally had in place of 'pursuit of happiness'
In his case, I think that was about chasing around the slave women.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
What/who makes up the ones that are not paying taxes?
The "Ones" that we have been waiting for.
I am seriously trying to understand this. If you're not paying taxes, then you must not be employed. Or you're wealthy enough to afford loopholes.
Which is it?
My father doesn't pay taxes, yet "makes" over $40,000/yr - tax free.
My father is a disgusting, lazy, piece of shit who has been on the government dole for over 40 years. He has drawn a disability check from the Navy for almost 50 years.
His "disability" is supposedly from asthma... but he doesn't have asthma. What he did, is he is allergic to cats - very allergic - he put cat hair in a jar and walked around sniffing it all day.
He got himself so sick that he was able to fool the Navy Doctor, who gave him a medical discharge and 10% disability - that has since been raised to 100%.
Beyond that, he was in a car accident in which he was severely injured. He was drunk and two women died; however, since the accident technically wasn't his fault - another car crossed the center line - and they didn't routinely test blood alcohol levels back in the 60's, he was able to get onto Social Security disability - despite the fact that he can walk (although with a limp) and otherwise function normally.
After a few years, Social Security reviewed his status and informed him that he would be cut off. My fathers response was similar to what he did to get disability from the Navy - he pickled himself in a liquor bottle to the point where he ended up on the hospital, and Social Security upped his "benefits" b/c of his "disability" due to alcohol abuse.
Beyond that, he rents out small trailers on his property - property he scammed from an old man with alzheimers - and doesn't declare the income.
He's drawn many, many thousands of dollars out of everyone elses pockets, and hasn't paid a dime himself, yet he "makes" over $40,000/year.
He is a professional victim, and a professional free loader... perfectly capable of working, but has found a way to get others to pay his way. Needless to say, he loves the democratic party :)
Has always said, "if people are dumb enough to give me money for nothing, I'm smart enough to take it". Brags all time about how he doesn't have to pay taxes. Says that people who work for a living are fools.
Makes me ill just thinking about it...
Needless to say, I don't talk to my father anymore... too busy working to pay his way, and the way of every other free loader out there.
-
I'd rather pay my share and his, than live like that.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by packinpatland
I'd rather pay my share and his, than live like that.
You've taken your first steps into a larger world. :D
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
This funny, either you have to have no job, or you're too wealthy to pay taxes. When was the last time that you did your taxes? Maybe you should pay more attention, because I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney.
I would get a better accountant if I was you.
How?
Most employers pay FICA off the top and then you have to pay state/local wage tax.
Do you mean you don't have to pay more in taxes (i.e., you paid enough along the way)?
I just don't see how people don't pay taxes....
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
I'm serious too. At the lower ends, through "tax credits" etc., individuals do NOT pay taxes. This is what we have been trying to say for weeks in this forum.
It's the essence of "redistribution".
So you think the working poor are not pulling their weight.
Have you ever talked to ANYBODY who is getting-by working low wage jobs?
I don't doubt that they pay little or no federal income taxes, although you neglect that they pay a huge percentage of their income on social security tax compared to people who have investment income.
Our economy is built on exploitation of people. Just look around you. So many people are working at jobs that require long hours to provide a bare subsistance living for one person, and can't possibly support a family. Often with no benefits.
Income is not being redistributed to the working poor. They are being allowed to keep enough money to survive so they can continue to serve you. And if they get seriously injured or ill, they are permanently indebted and fucked for this lifetime.
QFT
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fosco33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz
This funny, either you have to have no job, or you're too wealthy to pay taxes. When was the last time that you did your taxes? Maybe you should pay more attention, because I certainly haven't paid taxes for the last 4 years and last year my wife was actually working as an attorney.
I would get a better accountant if I was you.
How?
Most employers pay FICA off the top and then you have to pay state/local wage tax.
Do you mean you don't have to pay more in taxes (i.e., you paid enough along the way)?
I just don't see how people don't pay taxes....
Barrys talking about federal income tax. Most people with a mortgage, kids, medical bills, retirement contributions, flexible spending accounts, charitable contributions, pay little or no federal income tax when its all said and done. This is dem rhetoric we hear ever four years.
Total election year hooey.
-
Re: Representation without Taxation
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderDan
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardRoark
If Taxation without Representation is tyranny, what is Representation without Taxation?
According to IRS data, in the early 1980’s, 17% of the public did not pay any taxes to the Federal Government. By 1990 that number was up to 21%. 1993, it was 24%......01 it was 27%....04 it was 33%.
Under Obama’s plan it will hit 44%. By 2014, it will hit the 50% level.
How is it again that you cook a frog?
Howard those stats are extremely biased. It should say did not pay any income tax to the federal government.
All wage earners pay payroll yax of 7.65% on there first $102,000 of income in 2008 after that it drops to 1.45%.
It also doesn't take into effect different segments of the business world. I have a client who usually makes $1,000,000 per year. Last year he lost $250,000 so would be classified as paying no taxes to the federal government. In fact, we completed a NOL Carryback and he received over a $60,000 refund. He still lives in his $3,000,000 house.
Then there is the gas tax that everyone with a car pays.
On top of that there is sales tax and property taxes that the state and municipalities collect.
I'm not sure what your point is but in the early 80s before the Reagan tax cut we had a 50% tax bracket and 83% of Americans were paying tax. Higher taxation led to more jobs and income to report on tax returns? :oops:
See how easy it is to manipulate statistics to say what you want.
I guess because I mentioned the IRS I thought it was apparent that I was talking about Income Taxes. I am not trying to be a smart ass by saying that, just trying to clear it up; also for Fosco33. The Payroll taxes are there for everyone, and every employer up to $102,000. That will change after The Autobigropher is elected. But to a certain extent aren’t these really NOT even taxes? Theoretically, they are a “forced” savings plan because all of us sheep have been dumbed down to the point we can’t even figure out how to save for retirement….(buy a house, educate our kids, buy healthcare, etc, etc). So, just to be clear, I was referring to Income taxes.
I am not a CPA, but Capital losses can only be written off against Capital gains. I think you can write off $3,000 against ordinary income. As far as your client, I take you at your word. I would be interested in hearing more about how to do that though.
You actually re-make the point that a few others have made here today about all the other taxes we pay every time we turn around, or die for that matter. Kind of makes me ill when I add it all up, ends up being around 50 cents on every dollar earned.