National Media Agreeing with Chewy......
So far Jim Rome and Dan Patrick both agree that Favre being a me first player.
I know people on these forums are either too emotionally attatched to realize that their hero or in some cases fantasy lover is not a good team player. Favres comments and actions are putting pressure from media and from a roster standpoint on the team.
"I'm" going to wait untill I see what they do.
What are they going to do; cut "me"?
"I" know I can still play at a high level
"My" legacy will speak for itself
"I've" always played this way. "I'm not going to change the way "I" play.
Everything that comes out of Bretts mouth lately is "me" related. He believes that he is bigger than the team and he has no intention of playing to help the team win. He wants the team to strategize to help him win. Giving Favre weapons at costs that are higher than what Thompson believes is value for a player has negative effects on the future of the team and Favre is not concerned with the health of the organization. He is only concerned with his own ego.
Chewy should have kept his words to himself just like Childress but he is right on. Favre is a "me" first player and IMHO should be cut. I just don't see how bringing back a player who throws INT's and then says "I will not change the way I play the game" Who calls out players through the media instead of face to face. Who calls out the organization through the media instead of face to face. Favre's EGO is so big that he's unable to see how ignorant his words and actions really are. People here are so emotionally attached they are unable to see what a dip shit favre is being. Just like Giants fans in SF and their undying love for Barry Bonds; Packer fans have the most non-objective views becasue of their emotional attachments.
Let the insults fly from Favres legion of big brothers, mothers and sexual fantasizers. I'm sure most here don't want to accept their beloved "Lord Favre" has become a "me first", ego driven player. Thats my take.
Re: National Media Agreeing with Chewy......
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCollins
So far Jim Rome and Dan Patrick both agree that Favre being a me first player.
I know people on these forums are either too emotionally attatched to realize that their hero or in some cases fantasy lover is not a good team player. Favres comments and actions are putting pressure from media and from a roster standpoint on the team.
"I'm" going to wait untill I see what they do.
What are they going to do; cut "me"?
"I" know I can still play at a high level
"My" legacy will speak for itself
"I've" always played this way. "I'm not going to change the way "I" play.
Everything that comes out of Bretts mouth lately is "me" related. He believes that he is bigger than the team and he has no intention of playing to help the team win. He wants the team to strategize to help him win. Giving Favre weapons at costs that are higher than what Thompson believes is value for a player has negative effects on the future of the team and Favre is not concerned with the health of the organization. He is only concerned with his own ego.
Chewy should have kept his words to himself just like Childress but he is right on. Favre is a "me" first player and IMHO should be cut. I just don't see how bringing back a player who throws INT's and then says "I will not change the way I play the game" Who calls out players through the media instead of face to face. Who calls out the organization through the media instead of face to face. Favre's EGO is so big that he's unable to see how ignorant his words and actions really are. People here are so emotionally attached they are unable to see what a dip shit favre is being. Just like Giants fans in SF and their undying love for Barry Bonds; Packer fans have the most non-objective views becasue of their emotional attachments.
Let the insults fly from Favres legion of big brothers, mothers and sexual fantasizers. I'm sure most here don't want to accept their beloved "Lord Favre" has become a "me first", ego driven player. Thats my take.
This is assenine. If I ask you what you think about something or what you'll be doing this week then you tell me how you're going to answer that question without using "I" in the answer.
Favre's been bombarded with questions in which the answers have the word "I" in it because the question is about him!
As for Patrick and Rome....why do you think they're even talking about it? Why are they taking that stance? It's called ratings and it's a frequently used tactic on talk shows to take outrageous stances in order to get callers to call in. Rome has built his life on this.
Re: National Media Agreeing with Chewy......
"I'm" going to wait untill I see what they do.
How else do you respond to any question that requires you to give your personal opinion on anything?
What are they going to do; cut "me"?
This is not a "me first" comment unless you (the reader/listener) want it to be. He is simply stating that he knows it is a possible outcome. He has said it before that he realizes there may come a time that he is not part of the plan.
"I" know I can still play at a high level
As does TT, MM, and anyone who paid any attention to last season's results and are not simply looking at a single statistic on a stat sheet.
"My" legacy will speak for itself
As will Marino's, Manning's (both of'em), and even Couch's. Simply stating it is not a "me first" position.
"I've" always played this way. "I'm not going to change the way "I" play.
Sometimes honesty is not going to help you any. But seriously, the saying goes "you can't teach an old dog new tricks"