Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Time to sit Wells? Clifton?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708

    Time to sit Wells? Clifton?

    Scott Wells did not participate in practice on Thursday. He strained a chest muscle in practice on Wednesday. They don't believe it is serious, but are being careful. Clifton of course was held out of practice, too.

    Wells is becoming amazingly unreliable physically for a young guy. MM emphasized a few weeks ago that the line needed to practice together in order to improve its performance. He even had Clifton take more reps during the week before last because of that, but then Clifton was out most if not all of last week's practices.

    When these guys are out it affects two positions, because Colledge and Spitz are their backups. So not only do Clifton and Wells miss their practices, Colledge and Spitz miss reps at their regular positions, too. Then game time rolls around and you have 4 changes from the way they lined up in practice. Only Tauscher stays the same.

    If Sitton is healthy, I think it is time to pull the plug on Wells as the starter, go to Spitz at center and start Sitton. I'm close to saying the same for Clifton.

  2. #2
    I've been thinking this (your thread title) and added Tausch for 3 weeks. I know Wells has only been back less.

    I love all 3 for what they have done for the Packers, but it's time for them to become backups.

  3. #3
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    I still think Tauscher is the best RT on the team.

    I'm less convinced that Colledge-Barbre is worse than Clifton-Colledge (or some other variation such as Spitz at LG and Sitton at RG.) Once Clifton gets over the hamstring or whatever his injury is, I think they will be better with him, but I would be willing to try another lineup until he gets as healed as he can.

    I would really like to try Spitz at center with Sitton at guard. I think Wells-Spitz is better than Spitz-Moll, but I would like to see Spitz-Sitton for a game.

  4. #4
    Eric Von Zipper Rat All-Pro CaliforniaCheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Clifton has a high cap number and I don't see him finishing his contract.

    I look for more than one O lineman to be drafted new year.

    Sure a couple of high picks will go to DT with contracts expiring soon. CB may get one but mid rounders will be on the O-line.

    Tauscher's contract is up at the end of the year. Barbre and Sitton are promising at Guard. The tackles need upgrading and a little bit of competition will help. Moll is not the answer.

    Spitz and Colledge still deserve more time as they are still learning and improving.

    Every draft at least one O-lineman and one D-lineman is needed. Regardless of other needs.

  5. #5
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Patler, the coaches should know if the constant disruption is causing the loss of line cohesiveness. I suspect they are really close to doing what you suggest. It wouldn't surprise me if the new line is revealed after the bye week. The key will be to look at those nagging injuries and ask: "Is this going to go on all year?" If they think the answer is yes, it's time to pull the plug on the two of them. If no, they might try to use the bye week to heal everyone up and keep going. If Wells and Clifton continue to be hurt after that, then it may kill the second half of the season along the line. I think they should make the change over the bye, if not this week. (If Colledge were to go this week, he would really have his hands full - good thing the game is not on turf in Indy).
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  6. #6
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    TT has drafted O-linemen every year, usually two, and I don't see that changing. Wolf always seemed to draft some every year too. He said you have to just to cover normal attrition. Wolf always seemed to have a couple waiting in the wings to take over, but that was by necessity, especially guards, because he didn't believe in paying the guards all that much and was content with new starters on the O-line just about every year.

    I'm sort of intrigued by Giacomini. Obviously he is of no help whatsoever this year, and may not be next year either, he is that raw, apparently. But with a couple years of weight training, he could be a huge RT, and they say he has very good feet and athleticism. They also say he is extremely focused and very tenacious. Might turn out to be nothing, but looks like he could be an interesting developmental player, too.

  7. #7
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand
    Patler, the coaches should know if the constant disruption is causing the loss of line cohesiveness. I suspect they are really close to doing what you suggest. It wouldn't surprise me if the new line is revealed after the bye week. The key will be to look at those nagging injuries and ask: "Is this going to go on all year?" If they think the answer is yes, it's time to pull the plug on the two of them. If no, they might try to use the bye week to heal everyone up and keep going. If Wells and Clifton continue to be hurt after that, then it may kill the second half of the season along the line. I think they should make the change over the bye, if not this week. (If Colledge were to go this week, he would really have his hands full - good thing the game is not on turf in Indy).
    I agree. I was surprised that MM mentioned the disruptions were taking their toll. He even said he talked to Clifton about sitting out last week and this to have basically 3-4 weeks to recover, and allow the team to have consistency in practice and games. MM seems concerned about the disruptions, but also seems a bit reluctant to act. The bye week might be the time for him to think it through and do it. Clifton has been such a rock in pass protection that I can understand TT's reluctance to sit him.

    With Wells it is turning out to be one thing after another. He missed three starts last year, and has been hurt through out the off season and now with one thing or another.

  8. #8

    Re: Time to sit Wells? Clifton?

    I agree. If these guys can't practice at all, then it's time to sit them until they are healthy enough to go in practice. I agree that it's better to have Colledge - Barbre - Spitz - Sitton - Tausch practice and then play than it is to have that group practice and then Clifton - Colledge - Wells - Spitz - Tausch play. Think about, one player is practicing at their position. Thats it. Everybody else is only getting reps at their position on game day. It makes no sense.
    GO PACK!!!!

  9. #9
    I too have been thinking Clifton and Wells should be benched for awhile. Sitton and Barbre are inexperienced but much stronger in moving big bodies in the run game. It can't hurt to try.

  10. #10
    Barbershop Rat HOFer Pugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    8,887
    I'm beginning to wonder if our poor line play can be attributed to coaching - especially Campen. Yes, some of the guys are hurting but before Campen became our line coach I don't remember our line playing this poorly even when we plugged in back-ups.... Or am I wrong....

  11. #11
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugger
    I'm beginning to wonder if our poor line play can be attributed to coaching - especially Campen. Yes, some of the guys are hurting but before Campen became our line coach I don't remember our line playing this poorly even when we plugged in back-ups.... Or am I wrong....
    The line didn't play well during Sherman's last season, with Wahle and Rivera gone, and Beightol as the O-line coach. Beightol took a lot of flak for that, even from some of Sherman's comments toward the end of the year. The line didn't play well in MM's first season with Joe Philbin as the O-line coach. It's been an ongoing concern.

  12. #12
    Opa Rat HOFer Freak Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Land of the midnight sun
    Posts
    15,405
    Whoever is out there come Sunday they better be ready for Freeney.

  13. #13
    Grandpa Rat HOFer The Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In Bear's Territory
    Posts
    2,784
    Pressure (or lack of it) on Manning will tell the tale on Sunday.
    Time for KGB to awaken.
    Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

  14. #14
    CutlerquitRat HOFer
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Woodbury Mn
    Posts
    7,711
    If these guys are too hurt to battle at a top level sit them and let them get healthy.
    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

  15. #15
    Grandpa Rat HOFer The Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In Bear's Territory
    Posts
    2,784
    Wells is a bit easier to sub for (Spitz) than Clifton.
    Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

  16. #16
    I think they should consider moving Tausch at some point in time to guard. That was the plan in the past. Could work out now.

  17. #17
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliforniaCheez
    I look for more than one O lineman to be drafted new year.
    CC, I think at this point you'd know better than to make any sort of a prediction about what TT's going to do in the draft!
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  18. #18
    Digital Rat HOFer digitaldean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kimberly, WI
    Posts
    3,535
    I don't know about moving Tauscher, at least at this point.

    One thing seems apparent, Clifton though still trying like hell through injury is struggling mightily this year.

    With the amt. of injury he has to deal with, I don't see him being here beyond 1 more season. Tauscher has had his issues so far too, but nearly to the same degree.

    I'd lean to having Sitton get in there more.
    -digital dean

    No "TROLLS" allowed!

  19. #19
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Patler
    I'm sort of intrigued by Giacomini. Obviously he is of no help whatsoever this year, and may not be next year either, he is that raw, apparently. But with a couple years of weight training, he could be a huge RT, and they say he has very good feet and athleticism. They also say he is extremely focused and very tenacious. Might turn out to be nothing, but looks like he could be an interesting developmental player, too.
    Giacomini does seem to be a project. I hope he turns out better than our last OL project, Coston - he was also raw, needed time to develop physically, etc. I'm surprised they didn't stash him on the PS, and move him up if someone tried to sign him.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  20. #20

    Clifton still rocks.

    Considering we were doubting him prior to the Indy game, we should all give a lot of credit to Cliffy for taking yet another probowl speed rushing DE out of the game. Football Outsiders thought so much of his play that they singled him out for in depth analysis of how he out played Freeney. Here's the end of a much longer article :
    Clifton's extremely good at picking up speed-rushing ends from an angle, as he did to Freeney with 8:20 left in the first half. Freeney tried to drive inside at the snap, but Clifton proved to be far too powerful, and his technique too good, for that to happen. By the end of the first half, Clifton was starting to exert physical pressure on Freeney, forcing him lower to the ground and taking away whatever leverage he had.

    Clifton was going to have some advantages coming into this game - the Colts didn't blitz a lot, which meant that he wouldn't have to deal with Freeney's speed and someone else's power at the same time. Still, his ability to take that speed and consistently push it out of the way really impressed me. He also displayed the ability to drive-block when facing end Josh Thomas on certain plays. Clifton is a classic grinder -- he's missed only one game since returning in 2003 from the Sapp injury -- and he's playing as well as any team can ask of its premier offensive lineman. Freeney displayed good speed and agility; he was simply defeated by an opponent playing at a very high level.
    So Clifton's still got it and we should all feel like schmucks for doubting the guy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •