Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: Ahman Green or Shaun Alexander?

  1. #1
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708

    Ahman Green or Shaun Alexander?

    Shaun Alexander made the NFL All-Decade team. Personally, I would have taken Ahman Green over Shaun Alexander any day.

    As runners? - A toss up. Green had a better per carry average (4.5 to 4.3). Alexander had more TDs (88 to 60). Green had 9,205 yards; Alexander had 9,453 yards.

    As receivers? - Green by a lot in all categories. Receptions: 378 to 215; yards: 2883 to 1520; average: 7.6 to 7.1 ; TDs: 14 to 12. Green was a very good receiver, Alexander worked to be mediocre.

    As blockers? - Green by a landslide. Green in his prime was a very, very good blocker. Alexander was bad and was often out of the game in passing situations because of it.

    Ahman Green deserves more than he gets in attention for his career.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Elegantly Wasted Rat All-Pro Noodle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,344
    Great post, Patler. Two great backs, to be sure, but I give it to Green for his versatility and style of play.

    His blocking in particular really was an unappreciated aspect of his game. He would just destroy guys. And his ability to chip and then get out for a catch made him a lethal weapon.

    As to the TDs, well, we had a pretty good QB in those days who really liked to throw near the goal line.

    Favre rightfully commanded the attention, and as a consequence, I think Green was rarely thought about when it came to discussions of great backs. But there was no one in the last decade who could combine his flat out speed, power, and football player mentality.

  4. #4
    Senior Rat HOFer Bossman641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    6,051
    Ahman Green was one of my favorite players a few years back. He always ran angry and knew how to finish his runs.

    Regarding Alexander, I never understood how he put up the stats he did. He wasn't particularly fast, he didn't have moves, and he didn't run people over. Instead, he ran out of bounds to avoid contact. Did he just have great vision and never took bad steps? Sure it helped that left side of the line in front of him.
    Go PACK

  5. #5
    There wasn't a Jim Brown - Gayle Sayers - Walter Payton- Barry Sanders superstar in the past ten years. Is that because the NFL is a passing league now? I think Green is the best of the era.

  6. #6
    Opa Rat HOFer Freak Out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Land of the midnight sun
    Posts
    15,405
    Green changed the teams he was on in GB dramatically....with the O-line that was built it seemed he was unstoppable for a couple of years. Just a great all around back. Alexander was kind of a three yards and a cloud of dust guy if I remember correctly....?

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
    There wasn't a Jim Brown - Gayle Sayers - Walter Payton- Barry Sanders superstar in the past ten years. Is that because the NFL is a passing league now? I think Green is the best of the era.
    Adrian Peterson? He's gotta be the closest. He is the best back to enter the NFL in a long time.

    Green was out of this world good. Super fast and ultra big and strong.

    I never really was a fan of Alexander. He didn't have any unique talent that I'm aware of. Green had crazy good speed and strength and was so well rounded.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by ICU81MI
    Adrian Peterson? He's gotta be the closest. He is the best back to enter the NFL in a long time.
    I think Peterson is still a bit of a mystery. Chris Johnson is better right now

    I don't think we'll ever see a great bruising back like Jim Brown or even Ironhead Heyward because the defenders are so much bigger, faster and stronger. Peterson is fast and beastly in the open field, he kills DBs and sometimes linebackers, but I'm surprised that he really doesn't break tackles that much around the line of scrimmage. Maybe Peterson is another Jim Brown playing against more physically gifted defenders.

  9. #9
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,207
    I absolutely agree that Green was a much, much better back than Alexander. He had very similar numbers rushing and was a better receiver and blocker. Thus, he was much better.

    I agree too with statements that have been made earlier that Green has been unfairly abused about the fumbling. Those occurred early in the season and abated after about a half dozen games, and once he started wearing those rubber sleeves it seemed no longer an issue at all. It's the perception of his fumle-itis that has really hurt him, I think.

    Green was rock-solid in ball protection compared to Adrian Peterson, yet Peterson has not seem to have suffered as much criticism.

    I think Green has been underappreciated.

  10. #10
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    19,708
    Fumbles: Total/lost

    James...... 44/24
    Lewis........ 39/25
    Green........ 37/24
    Alexander.. 31/27
    Tomlinson. 27/12

  11. #11
    Roadkill Rat HOFer mraynrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    with 11 long-haired friends of Jesus in a chartreuse microbus
    Posts
    47,938
    Alexander got it because he set a TD record and went to the Superbowl. If they had given the rock to Green on that fourth and one in Philly, it would be Green on the all decade team, because it would have likely been Green, running behind the U71 that would have propelled the Packers past Carolina and into the Superbowl - unless He who cannot be named in this thread throws a late pick.
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

  12. #12
    Captain Rat HOFer Smidgeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    East Bay
    Posts
    4,075
    Quote Originally Posted by mraynrand
    Alexander got it because he set a TD record and went to the Superbowl. If they had given the rock to Green on that fourth and one in Philly, it would be Green on the all decade team, because it would have likely been Green, running behind the U71 that would have propelled the Packers past Carolina and into the Superbowl - unless He who cannot be named in this thread throws a late pick.
    Don't be silly. That would never happen.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Harlan Huckleby
    There wasn't a Jim Brown - Gayle Sayers - Walter Payton- Barry Sanders superstar in the past ten years. Is that because the NFL is a passing league now? I think Green is the best of the era.
    LT was pretty damn good. Maybe not quite in line with those guys, but still pretty ridiculous.

  14. #14
    Fried Rat HOFer KYPack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In the Bluegrass
    Posts
    8,659
    Blog Entries
    1
    I think LT has to be #1. He gained over 12,000 yards in the decade. he's obviously over now, but the guy did it all.

    I'd say LT #1

    2. Edge James

    3. Green

    4 Jamal Lewis second highest total yards in the decade and a 2000+ season. I know you NFC boys don't think much of him, but he was the man for a number of seasons.

    5. Alexander. He is a really good person and I think it helps his voting appeal with the media/writers. Boone County High School in Florence KY is 8 miles from my house. The road that leads to it is Shaun Alexander Drive. I've been at a handful of Golf Outings and charity events where Shaun has been present and I've never met him. So if this was personally biased, he'd be #1 on the list.

    I'm with the Boss. Shaun owes a lot of his personal success to Walter Jones and Steve Hutchinson.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by KYPack
    I think LT has to be #1. He gained over 12,000 yards in the decade. he's obviously over now, but the guy did it all.

    I'd say LT #1

    2. Edge James

    3. Green

    4 Jamal Lewis second highest total yards in the decade and a 2000+ season. I know you NFC boys don't think much of him, but he was the man for a number of seasons.

    5. Alexander. He is a really good person and I think it helps his voting appeal with the media/writers. Boone County High School in Florence KY is 8 miles from my house. The road that leads to it is Shaun Alexander Drive. I've been at a handful of Golf Outings and charity events where Shaun has been present and I've never met him. So if this was personally biased, he'd be #1 on the list.

    I'm with the Boss. Shaun owes a lot of his personal success to Walter Jones and Steve Hutchinson.
    Marshall Faulk came a little early for the All Decade Team, but he did some damage in the 2000's.

  16. #16
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    20,207
    Quote Originally Posted by get louder at lambeau
    Quote Originally Posted by KYPack
    I think LT has to be #1. He gained over 12,000 yards in the decade. he's obviously over now, but the guy did it all.

    I'd say LT #1

    2. Edge James

    3. Green

    4 Jamal Lewis second highest total yards in the decade and a 2000+ season. I know you NFC boys don't think much of him, but he was the man for a number of seasons.

    5. Alexander. He is a really good person and I think it helps his voting appeal with the media/writers. Boone County High School in Florence KY is 8 miles from my house. The road that leads to it is Shaun Alexander Drive. I've been at a handful of Golf Outings and charity events where Shaun has been present and I've never met him. So if this was personally biased, he'd be #1 on the list.

    I'm with the Boss. Shaun owes a lot of his personal success to Walter Jones and Steve Hutchinson.
    Marshall Faulk came a little early for the All Decade Team, but he did some damage in the 2000's.
    I think his wife is concerned about this.

  17. #17
    One track mind...
    "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

  18. #18
    Senior Rat HOFer The Leaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    5,452
    Personally, I think Green was a better RB...better receiver, more speed.

    However, I can't disagree with giving Alexander the nod. He scored a lot more TDs, which is a very important stat for RBs. He also helped take a team to a Super Bowl, which Green did not do.

    There are good arguments to make on both sides IMO.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

  19. #19
    Senior Rat HOFer The Leaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    5,452
    Per the fumbling...

    Green did fumble more than his share IMO for a guy who wasn't a pure power runner. I would expect guys like Jamal Lewis and Alexander to fumble more often than other RBs, because they carried the rock a lot between the tackles in a power running game. Green, while certainly a physical runner, was not a typical power runner.

    I don't think he fumbled in horrible excess...more like slightly above average. It also seemed like the Packer lost more than their fair share of those fumbles compared to how often other RB fumbles are recovered by the offense.

    That is why I think Green came to earn the "fumbler" moniker...not really fair, because it wasn't a statistically significant difference, but there is a small grain of truth in it due mostly to bad luck.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

  20. #20
    I think he got the nickname because his fumbles came in bunches. He'd put it on the ground for a few weeks, then his coaches would come up with a fix and he'd go a long while without one. I think statistically he fumbled less than other backs, but it may seem worse if we lost a lot of those fumbles.
    "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •