Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Over the Cap

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Stout Rat HOFer Guiness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Posts
    13,533

    Over the Cap

    The thread about Bakhtiari resigning got me looking at the cap situation for next year. Over the cap has a nice chart that gives an overview. It assumes a cap number of 176M

    https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/

    The Pack are projected to have 2M of space with what they already have committed. That would be with none of their own FAs resigned of course.
    I think the 'effective cap space' column assumes the roster is filled out with minimum wage guys.

    I don't pretend to understand what the hell is going on with the Eagles and Saints, who project to 64 and 94M over!
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

  2. #2
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,713
    Cap savings by cutting various players:

    Aaron Rodgers - 4.8M
    Z. Smith - 10.75M
    Davante Adams - 13M
    Preston Smith - 8M
    Adrian Amos - 4.3M
    Billy Turner - 3.55M
    Dean Lowry - 3.3M
    Ricky Wagner - 4.25M
    Christian Kirksey - 6M
    Josh Jackson - 1.3M
    Oren Burks - 945T
    Last edited by Joemailman; 11-16-2020 at 12:15 PM.

  3. #3
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    18,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    Cap savings by cutting various players:

    Aaron Rodgers - 4.8M
    Z. Smith - 10.75M
    Davante Adams - 13M
    Preston Smith - 8M
    Adrian Amos - 4.3M
    Billy Turner - 3.55M
    Dean Lowry - 3.3M
    Ricky Wagner - 4.25M
    Christian Kirksey - 6M
    Josh Jackson - 1.3M
    Oren Burks - 945T
    I think you kirksey has 7 weeks to prove he doesn't need to go. You may argue to cut preston, especially given what is going to be available on the market. Amos imo, probably can be replaced for less. Lowrey and Wagner would go if I were GM, just because I think, again, bargain hunting this year will be key. If you approach it as an investment portfolio you would say, "yes, he is worth this price, but I don't have free cash and there are better allocations of capital so...bye so I can buy."
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  4. #4
    Sugadaddy Rat HOFer Zool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Across the border to the West
    Posts
    13,320
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    Cap savings by cutting various players:

    Aaron Rodgers - 4.8M
    Z. Smith - 10.75M
    Davante Adams - 13M
    Preston Smith - 8M
    Adrian Amos - 4.3M
    Billy Turner - 3.55M
    Dean Lowry - 3.3M
    Ricky Wagner - 4.25M
    Christian Kirksey - 6M
    Josh Jackson - 1.3M
    Oren Burks - 945T
    Can we get a collection going to pay for the loss of Burks? I’d definitely contribute.
    Quote Originally Posted by 3irty1 View Post
    This is museum quality stupidity.

  5. #5
    I think Lowry, Wagner, and Kirksey (although I don't hate him as much as others, more because they have some young guys that look intriguing) are as good as gone.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  6. #6
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    I think Lowry, Wagner, and Kirksey (although I don't hate him as much as others, more because they have some young guys that look intriguing) are as good as gone.
    I think id cut Preston, Wagner and Kirksey. I'd look at a cheap resign of Fackrell, extending Montravious for cheap and Lowry is already cheap. Solid veteran big guys are a luxury in the NFL. Three for the price of Preston seems a no brainer
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by RashanGary View Post
    I think id cut Preston, Wagner and Kirksey. I'd look at a cheap resign of Fackrell, extending Montravious for cheap and Lowry is already cheap. Solid veteran big guys are a luxury in the NFL. Three for the price of Preston seems a no brainer
    It all depends on how Preston plays. If he's solid down the stretch, it would be hard to give up an good all around OLB in this defense. Guys like Wagner, Lowry (I'm very down on him), and Kirksey (we have alternatives) are easier to find.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  8. #8
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Guiness View Post
    The thread about Bakhtiari resigning got me looking at the cap situation for next year. Over the cap has a nice chart that gives an overview. It assumes a cap number of 176M

    https://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/

    The Pack are projected to have 2M of space with what they already have committed. That would be with none of their own FAs resigned of course.
    I think the 'effective cap space' column assumes the roster is filled out with minimum wage guys.

    I don't pretend to understand what the hell is going on with the Eagles and Saints, who project to 64 and 94M over!
    Saints have 13 players who would have a cap hit of over 10M in 2021. Eagles have 12. The Packers, by comparison, have 5.

  9. #9
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Runyan, Dillon, Barnes and Kamal Martin gonna go a long way to allowing us to save some big �� in 2021 and beyond. Rookies are rookies and they almost always suck, but these guys have a lot of 2nd year potential!
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  10. #10
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    31,713
    Yep. You want to keep both Smiths with Gary. Guys comparable to Wagner, Kirksey and Lowry are going to be available for fewer dollars in FA.

  11. #11
    Agree the draft picks have to pan out... especially in years 2 & 3.
    I think Lowry and Kirksey are the most likely. Lowry is JAG and this offseason there were similar vet DL signing for a fraction of Lowry's contract -- I think it's fair to assume that will happen after COVID cuts.
    Kirksey's 6M would be nice to shed for a good if oft-injured player. ILB depth is shaky; Barnes and Martin have injury histories too, so they need someone besides Summers. Burks they probably bring back to camp and try to trade or cut him. Pettine plays a lot of S at the ILB, so maybe it doesn't matter.

    Wagner is iffy to me -- he's actually been serviceable at RT, and having him and Turner playing while Bahk was out (and Taylor on IR) didn't lead to much drop off. Losing a starting tackle can cause problems as Justin Skule and Jason Spriggs prove.

    If you cut Preston, you better hope Garvin and Gary can hold down that spot and find a 4th OLB who can drop into coverage. I could see them doing this to free space for Aaron Jones.

  12. #12
    Preston Smith, Kirksey, Lowry, Wagner, Turner for sure. I'd even cut Zakarius if there was a better OLB available.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

  13. #13
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    Preston is tough. It’s really nice to have three of them. I’m the only guy who likes Lowry on that small deal. I’ll take Lowry, Montravious and Fackrell (three young veteran serviceable guys who keep the front 4 fresh) over one Preston all day. I really don’t want to lose Montravious. He's become a servicable rotation guy like Lowry. I know we hate our DL around here, but it’s nice having a bunch of vets who can rotate in.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  14. #14
    Rider Rat HOFer Upnorth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    4,977
    Would be ok without p Smith if Gary can step it up a bit.
    We need to draft solid dt and ilb. After that saftey or wr. Just my opinion on priorities. All that assumes gary gets better of course.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Upnorth View Post
    Would be ok without p Smith if Gary can step it up a bit.
    We need to draft solid dt and ilb. After that saftey or wr. Just my opinion on priorities. All that assumes gary gets better of course.
    I'm not worried about S or ILB. I'd say DT, CB, and OT.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  16. #16
    Rider Rat HOFer Upnorth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    4,977
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    I'm not worried about S or ILB. I'd say DT, CB, and OT.
    Sullivan is solid. Jaire is on an all pro trajectory. CB isn't the issue.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Upnorth View Post
    Sullivan is solid. Jaire is on an all pro trajectory. CB isn't the issue.
    You need more than two good CBs. King is too injury prone to resign.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    You need more than two good CBs. King is too injury prone to resign.
    Agree. You need at least 3 - too much 11 personnel, plus injuries happen.
    They will give Jackson, Hollman and even guys like Samuels every chance to prove they belong and replace King. If that happens, Gute picks another Day 3 CB and GB develops them. If not, maybe they go CB earlier or sign a low end starter who's been cut on the cheap.

    If the money is right they might bring King back, but I suspect he signs a 1 year prove it deal elsewhere. There will be a lot of 1 year deals signed; as the cap pops back up those players will count on a bigger payday.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
    I'm not worried about S or ILB. I'd say DT, CB, and OT.
    I'll bang the table for a WR, but they do need DT and OT help and those guys go early. They have Clark and a mostly cast of JAGs at DL, and if they cut Wagner they have no OT depth unless you think Njiman will be a viable player after 2 years.

    They aren't great at S, but can get by there.

    ILB is likely not a priority. Even if they cut Kirksey, they have 2 guys with Barnes and Martin they can roll out there and will look for more UDFAs as they always do.

    I could see CB and OLB, especially if they cut Preston loose. And then there's RB if Jones is gone....ugh...Sorry, I didn't mean to turn this into a "draft needs" post.

  20. #20
    Lunatic Rat HOFer RashanGary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Green Bay
    Posts
    27,252
    I looked through at the nfl receiving leaders. They all had their last really good years between the ages of 32 and 35 (other than rice)

    Let’s say Adams is in the middle somewhere, even 33, a somewhat safe age considering he isn’t on the level of Moss and Owens and Fitzgerald.

    He turns 29 this year in December. He turns 30 next year, our last year with him under contract. You can’t extend him 4 years and expect that to work out. Paying a 34 year old receiver top dollar, who probably isn’t HOF level and has had injury concerns is a little sketchy.



    Maybe you go into the up coming draft with WR at the very top of your list of needs.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •