Ok so what would you do if say, the draft goes like this:
1. Houston-reggie
2.N.O.-Mario
3.Titans-leinart
4.Jets-Hawk
5.Packers??
would you take vernon, or trade down and nab someone like huff?
Ok so what would you do if say, the draft goes like this:
1. Houston-reggie
2.N.O.-Mario
3.Titans-leinart
4.Jets-Hawk
5.Packers??
would you take vernon, or trade down and nab someone like huff?
I think Davis would be a terror on offense. Just my opinion though.
I gotta go with the trade down. But,Davis would be good too... If another team gets Hawk..... Can't stand the thought of it. I still say A.J Hawk for prez.
HOFer
Between Davis and Huff, I take Davis.
Between Da Brick and Huff, I take Da Brick.
I'm not that big on Huff.
Would you trade down if you had the choice of da brick and huff?Originally Posted by HarveyWallbangers
I really think they need to trade down and get alot of early picks. Collins and Murphy (until he got hurt) proved Polar BEar can pick em.Would you trade down if you had the choice of da brick and huff?
HOFer
Absolutely.
Vernon Davis in a heartbeat. He'd spread out the D better than Keith Jackson did!
-digital dean
No "TROLLS" allowed!
I would take Young without even letting the clock tick down.
TT is likely to do something different, but you didn't ask what TT would do.
I like VD over Huff (long threads at C-E prove that!) from the choices given.
But if the draft went as you described in the first post, the answer is Brick.
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Trade down. I think TT will be leaning towards trading down right from the start. I will be surprised it he doesn't.
The zone-blocking scheme doesn't seem to call for O-line studs like Brick. I'd actually be disappointed if we picked of D'Brickshaw or one of the QB's.
1. Hawk
2. Davis
3. Trade down
[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Vernon don't look so good anymore.
Baah
Nor does Vince Young
If Mobb bumped this one, I was gonna go nuts.
Gex, lemme go half nuts.
Will you goofs quit bumping threads,
Please?
(We all know who the Michael Huff freak was, don't we?)
The bottom line was that draft in 2006 had what we thought a shit load of talent in the top portion of the draft. Really only Williams and Hawk have played reasonably well. Ferguson has been mediocre for the Jets, Huff isn't even starting, Davis is a freak athletically but can't seem to figure out the game of football, Young is a nut case, Reggie Bush is what he is a Dave Metcalf type. He can't be effective running the football 20 times a game, but will always be threat with the ball in his hand, he is a super third down back.
Hawk was drafted not because he had the highest of ceilings, he was drafted because he was going to be an above average, very solid pro football player that might not make 2 or 3 dynamic plays a game, but that he would play close to mistake free football.
I don't think that Hawk has been a great player, but when compared to the other top 10 or top 5 players of that draft I am sure glad the Packers took him and not Vince Young, who reportedly Thompson had a fudgie for.
Wasn't there a Terry Metcalf, also, Nutz? I get geeked every time someone makes a reference to a player from the 70's or 80's.
My favorite running back combo - MacArthur Lane and John Brockington.
I's still take Young in a heartbeat. But I'd also draft world renowned psychotherapist, Dr. John Holmes, MD, Ph.D.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
You gotta be kidding. Who can ever forget Howard Cosell yelling....
"Mr Versitility, Terry Metcalf!"
For Fritz.....
Harold Carmichael.
By the way, good choice on RB's!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
