Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 139

Thread: NFL Offseason/Free Agency/Non Draft Thread

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Spaulding View Post
    Rumor is that Nate Hobbs is our new CB on a 4yr 48million dollar deal. Seems high but maybe I'm missing something.
    16m guaranteed.

    Has more years starting than INTs and was ranked 110th in league for CBs…

    Seems oddly high
    The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
    Vince Lombardi

    "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

  2. #62
    So we had cap and didn’t have yet sign a vet WR or premier DL… makes sense
    The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
    Vince Lombardi

    "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

  3. #63
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Fosco33 View Post
    16m guaranteed.

    Has more years starting than INTs and was ranked 110th in league for CBs…

    Seems oddly high
    Don't know much about him because he's played with Raiders. His completion pct. allowed has gone down every year, so maybe Packers see him as an ascending player.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  4. #64
    The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
    Vince Lombardi

    "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

  5. #65
    Hobbs is a good tackler and played mostly in the slot... but that contract looks like outside corner money to me.
    Feels like an overpay to me, but $16M guaranteed over 4 years is not horrible, they can cut him easily after 2 years.
    Gives them another body in the room, and I wonder if they are working on something with Jaire or using this to tighten the screws on that situation. As it is Hobbs is an upgrade from Stokes. I have to think signing Hobbs is as much about scheme fit for Hafley as anything else, will be curious to hear what they say about where he'll play and how they want to deploy him. I thought they wanted to keep Bullard in the slot.

  6. #66
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,289
    I don't think he'll just be a slot guy. He has the height and arm length to play boundary. I don't know that much about Hobbs, but Gute has a pretty good track record on free agent signings.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  7. #67
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,310
    Quote Originally Posted by Fosco33 View Post
    So we had cap and didn’t have yet sign a vet WR or premier DL… makes sense
    have you seen the free agent list of WRs? I wouldn't waste my breath on them.

  8. #68
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    21,109
    Quote Originally Posted by run pMc View Post
    Hobbs is a good tackler and played mostly in the slot... but that contract looks like outside corner money to me.
    Feels like an overpay to me, but $16M guaranteed over 4 years is not horrible, they can cut him easily after 2 years.
    Gives them another body in the room, and I wonder if they are working on something with Jaire or using this to tighten the screws on that situation. As it is Hobbs is an upgrade from Stokes. I have to think signing Hobbs is as much about scheme fit for Hafley as anything else, will be curious to hear what they say about where he'll play and how they want to deploy him. I thought they wanted to keep Bullard in the slot.
    First, being merely an "upgrade from Stokes" is very faint praise; my mother might be able to clear that bar. Secondly, I hope you're right this is somehow about scheme fit - from what I've read Hobbs is much more a slot guy than an outside guy, so if he's going to play the slot, then what do you do with your 2nd round draft pick from last year? Where would Bullard play? Evanescent Williams and McKinney have the safety spots locked down. So that would mean they think Hobbs can play outside, right? It would also seem to suggest that Jaire's days with the team really truly will be over. I don't think you can have that kind of money tied up in three outside cornerbacks - Alexander, Hobbs, Nixon.

    It's a bit of a head scratcher for me, but you've got to presume the Packers know all these things and have an idea about how it'll all fit together. The most obvious is that they think Hobbs can play outside, so it'd be Hobbs/Nixon outside and Bullard inside, with Valentine backing up outside and maybe drafting a young corner in April. Though probably not with the first round pick. Or even the second?
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  9. #69
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,310
    I think they like Valentine better than Nixon on the outside. I am not sure how it all works out, only what Nixon went blabbering on about after the season in wanting to be a full time corner on the outside. to me, he is the dimeback if this defense wants to be elite. I didn't hate Stokes by the end of the year. Not sure if the Packers would want to bring him back and let him compete, but I wouldn't hate it on a one year prove it deal. Alexander will be released unless something crazy happens. So I still think the Packers need to invest at the position regardless of the Hobbs signing. Packer should be looking at drafting a corner in the first 3 rounds this year. They should have done it last year.

  10. #70
    I think they like Valentine but I also think he drives them crazy. He occasionally blows assignments, and his tackling is not great (ask Dallas Goddert). That said, he's young (was 21 when drafted) and has some talent. He's not bad. I think they put Nixon outside out of necessity (and him probably pestering Hafley to do play him there) and he exceeded their expectations. He was not great in the slot and seemed to play better outside. Problem with evaluating the CBs last year is by mid-season teams were attacking the MOF because the coverage by McDuffie, et al was not nearly as good as on the outside.

    I agree they will need to invest in CBs

    They also will need to invest in pass-rush: A QB under pressure can make an average secondary look like a great one.

  11. #71
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    21,109
    Agreed with you both. They'll need to draft another corner, maybe two. I'm just not sure that corner will come in the first round - with Hobbs/Nixon/Bullard, he'd be a dime back. And that's not a lot of bang for your buck for the first year. I'm thinking they go corner in round three, maybe round two.

    I'm hoping they'll grab a top-notch defensive tackle in the first round, or a defensive end if a good enough one is available at #23.

    Second round receiver, third round corner? But what do I know? Not much. Not much at all.

    I have been thinking the whole "BPA" thing is not as clear-cut as I used to think. My thinking was, well, if you're convinced a guy who's at a position you don't "need" - say, a tight end this year - is going to be an All Pro, you take him, because better an All Pro tight end than a jag at corner or defensive end or wherever. But that thinking can only hold up if you're able to consistently and correctly determine which guys are going to be head-and-shoulders-better than other guys. And no one has that down to a science. So unless some guy mysteriously drops from the top ten (Aaron Rodgers, Warren Sapp), you can't say for sure that one guy is obviously and clearly going to be a better tight end than another guy is going to be a corner or defensive tackle. So need can play a part, and probably should. Because if you take Mr. Super Star For Sure tight end when you really need a defensive tackle, and it turns out Mr. Super Star For Sure is not such a sure thing, well, you screwed yourself.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  12. #72
    Senior Rat All-Pro QBME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    The Flatland
    Posts
    1,307
    Don't know where to post this but seems right.

    Herb Brooks, coach of the 1980 Olympic men's hockey team, was being loudly criticized for passing over a couple of players who were widely recognized as being the best on the ice.

    Herb simply replied "I'm not interested in the best players. I'm interested in the best team".

  13. #73
    Cooper Kupp is being floated as a potential signee.
    Not sure what he has left. Leadership may have some value.

  14. #74
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    19,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    I think they like Valentine better than Nixon on the outside. I am not sure how it all works out, only what Nixon went blabbering on about after the season in wanting to be a full time corner on the outside. to me, he is the dimeback if this defense wants to be elite. I didn't hate Stokes by the end of the year. Not sure if the Packers would want to bring him back and let him compete, but I wouldn't hate it on a one year prove it deal. Alexander will be released unless something crazy happens. So I still think the Packers need to invest at the position regardless of the Hobbs signing. Packer should be looking at drafting a corner in the first 3 rounds this year. They should have done it last year.
    The packers have a long track record of giving up on defensive backs right before they get past the injury bug and put it together.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  15. #75
    Indenial Rat HOFer bobblehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lying in the Weeds
    Posts
    19,903
    Quote Originally Posted by run pMc View Post
    I think they like Valentine but I also think he drives them crazy. He occasionally blows assignments, and his tackling is not great (ask Dallas Goddert). That said, he's young (was 21 when drafted) and has some talent. He's not bad. I think they put Nixon outside out of necessity (and him probably pestering Hafley to do play him there) and he exceeded their expectations. He was not great in the slot and seemed to play better outside. Problem with evaluating the CBs last year is by mid-season teams were attacking the MOF because the coverage by McDuffie, et al was not nearly as good as on the outside.

    I agree they will need to invest in CBs

    They also will need to invest in pass-rush: A QB under pressure can make an average secondary look like a great one.
    It wasn't just McDuffie. In that breakout game by Cooper (Detroit on Thur night was it, or Minn...I'm old) he was destroyed in coverage. We all got excited about his dominance in the run game, but he was atrocious in the passing game.
    I don't hold Grudges. It's counterproductive.

  16. #76
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,289
    ‪Ian Rapoport‬ ‪@rapsheet1.bsky.social‬

    Russell Wilson is finalizing a deal with the Giants, as the Pro Bowler is the latest big QB domino, per The Insiders.

    Rather than wait for Aaron Rodgers, NYG adds another veteran QB to go along with Jameis Winston.


    ‪Ian Rapoport‬ ‪@rapsheet1.bsky.social‬

    Sources: The Patriots are signing Texans FA WR Stefon Diggs, one of the top free agents available. He gets a 3-year, $69M deal.

    After a successful visit to NE, including a physical thanks to an ACL tear that ended his 2024, he lands to be a key target for Drake Maye.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  17. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    ‪Ian Rapoport‬ ‪@rapsheet1.bsky.social‬

    Russell Wilson is finalizing a deal with the Giants, as the Pro Bowler is the latest big QB domino, per The Insiders.

    Rather than wait for Aaron Rodgers, NYG adds another veteran QB to go along with Jameis Winston.


    ‪Ian Rapoport‬ ‪@rapsheet1.bsky.social‬

    Sources: The Patriots are signing Texans FA WR Stefon Diggs, one of the top free agents available. He gets a 3-year, $69M deal.

    After a successful visit to NE, including a physical thanks to an ACL tear that ended his 2024, he lands to be a key target for Drake Maye.
    $69M? NOICE
    Seriously, that's a lot of dough for a guy that 3 teams have given up on. Probably a lot of funny money in the last year.

    I'll give Gute this much: if he's overpaying on the FA market (Banks), at least it's for players who are young with some runway for upside.

  18. #78
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,289
    Diggs faded 2nd half of 2023 season. WAs having a decent year last year before tearing ACL. Lot of money though to be paying a 31 year old receiver coming off an ACL if much of the money is real. Patriots are #1 in cap space though, so it's not a huge gamble for them.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  19. #79
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,289
    Dianna Russini
    @DMRussini

    The NFL’s owners have passed a rule change that will allow both teams to possess the ball in overtime during the regular season, per source.

    The overtime period will remain just 10 minutes.


    Vote on tush push expected today also.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  20. #80
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,289
    The NFL’s replay assist system will cover more plays during the 2025 season.

    League owners approved a proposal to expand the use of replay assist in a vote at the league meetings in Palm Beach on Tuesday. The proposal called for adding fouls for hits on a defenseless player, grabbing the facemask, performing a horse-collar tackle, tripping, and running into or roughing the kicker to be covered by the process.

    Replay assist will now be able to be used to pick up flags thrown for those infractions as long as there is clear evidence on video that on-field officials erred by calling the penalties.

    The change does not allow for flags to be thrown, so similarly clear evidence of an uncalled facemask or horse-collar tackle will not result in a penalty.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •