Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 262

Thread: Packers Offseason/Free Agency/ Non-Draft Thread

  1. #141
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,310
    Why wouldn't they train Morgan as the replacement for Walker? Tom isn't going to move to Left Tackle. Rhyan isn't a terrible player in fact he is pretty good in the run game, not sure why they need to replace him with Morgan. I think Morgan's value now that the Packers signed Banks is at Left Tackle. If they thought Morgan was ready to start at guard they would have never signed Banks. Maybe the problem with Morgan is that the Packers shouldn't have drafted him in the first place and he isn't the player they thought he was going to be, which is crazy because he was injured most of 2024 and he was a rookie.

  2. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    Why wouldn't they train Morgan as the replacement for Walker? Tom isn't going to move to Left Tackle. Rhyan isn't a terrible player in fact he is pretty good in the run game, not sure why they need to replace him with Morgan. I think Morgan's value now that the Packers signed Banks is at Left Tackle. If they thought Morgan was ready to start at guard they would have never signed Banks. Maybe the problem with Morgan is that the Packers shouldn't have drafted him in the first place and he isn't the player they thought he was going to be, which is crazy because he was injured most of 2024 and he was a rookie.
    Agree with all of this. We will know a lot about how they feel about Morgan based on if they resign Walker this summer or certainly by October.

  3. #143
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,288
    I think Morgan will be given the opportunity to compete for the LT job. Whether he wins the job this year or not, I think they see him as the future there and Walker will be gone after this year.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  4. #144
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    I think Morgan will be given the opportunity to compete for the LT job. Whether he wins the job this year or not, I think they see him as the future there and Walker will be gone after this year.
    Only if he wins the job or looks the part though (I know this is obvious, but I don't think this is a foregone conclusion yet). I think some steps need to be taken to ensure that.

  5. #145
    Yeah, I have to think they will give Morgan another shot at tackle. I don't think they want to sign Walker unless they have no option; having 4 OL on 2nd (expensive) contracts with Banks, Jenkins, Tom and Walker would be a lot of cap space allocated to OL.

    Hobbs is getting paid outside corner money, that's where they are going to play him. He's an upgrade over Stokes, but that's a lot of money they're paying him. CB still looks like a need, but it's not a gaping hole anymore...they can rotate 3 guys at the 2 spots (assuming Jaire will be gone).

  6. #146
    Neo Rat HOFer Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Detroitish
    Posts
    21,105
    I think Nutzy is correct - I'm still a bit mystified by the pick myself, especially especially if they end up making him a guard. I think of a first-round offensive lineman as being a tackle, preferably left tackle.

    I'm still hoping they take an offensive tackle in the middle rounds somewhere. Need to have a pipeline for that offensive line.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

  7. #147
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    20,072
    Clearly Morgan will get opportunities at tackle, that's what he was drafted for, OT potential.

    Don't remember if it was Gute or LeFleur who flat out admitted this off season that they made a mistake by not giving Morgan more opportunities at tackle last year, but justified it by saying the need at guard was more significant. Players and practice observers commented about Morgan's noticeable athleticism in drills. I am not concerned at all about Morgan...yet.

    It is never wrong to draft a high potential, versatile OL; 22% of your starters are OL. It was clear from the playoff game last year that GB needs OL depth. Guys who can perform competently at 2, 3 or 4 of the positions are invaluable on game days.

  8. #148
    Sounds like pack might cut jaire today? Why not keep him and make him play (and then trade him)?

    If everyone knows you don’t want something - why would they give you more than a 7th for him?

    Post 6/1 cut designation doesn’t save a whole lot of cap.

    And ffs we know he’ll just sign w/ the queens…
    The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
    Vince Lombardi

    "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

  9. #149
    Quote Originally Posted by Fosco33 View Post
    Sounds like pack might cut jaire today? Why not keep him and make him play (and then trade him)?

    If everyone knows you don’t want something - why would they give you more than a 7th for him?

    Post 6/1 cut designation doesn’t save a whole lot of cap.

    And ffs we know he’ll just sign w/ the queens…
    Pre 6/1 and there is $18M in dead cap this year. Post 6/1 there is ~$8M this year and $10M next year. That's significant enough.
    Fire Murphy, Gute, MLF, Barry, Senavich, etc!

  10. #150
    Keeping him until late in FA or even after the draft could boost interest. With what's left out there at CB, he'd get a lot of interest if they cut him now.
    The draft doesn't fall in favor of some team's board and they need a good CB, they might make a trade.

    If they don't dick him around there's not much downside for GB to keep Jaire in the short-term. His value probably fluctuates by the day, they will sell when it's high.

  11. #151
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,288
    Jaire will get traded hours before Day 3 of NFL Draft starts.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  12. #152
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    33,086
    Blog Entries
    2
    I think the reason Morgan never was tried at LT was he was leap years behind Wallace last year. Not a good thing. Hopefully he improves as we've had too many strikeouts in round one
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  13. #153
    Postal Rat HOFer Joemailman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    33,288
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky View Post
    I think the reason Morgan never was tried at LT was he was leap years behind Wallace last year. Not a good thing. Hopefully he improves as we've had too many strikeouts in round one
    The reason was because they felt Rasheed Walker was better than Sean Rhyan.
    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen

  14. #154
    Anti Homer Rat HOFer Bretsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Atkinson, WI
    Posts
    33,086
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Joemailman View Post
    The reason was because they felt Rasheed Walker was better than Sean Rhyan.
    agree to disagree
    LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?

  15. #155
    Fact Rat HOFer Patler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    One foot in my grave.
    Posts
    20,072
    Quote Originally Posted by Bretsky View Post
    I think the reason Morgan never was tried at LT was he was leap years behind Wallace last year. Not a good thing. Hopefully he improves as we've had too many strikeouts in round one
    I don't think there has been any evidence for that all. On the other hand, who would play RG was an open question last year. Some suggested Tom would be moved inside because of the "pro-bowl tackle, all-pro guard, HoF center" comment by the coaches. Others even suggested Meyers would get a shot.

  16. #156
    Kickass Rat HOFer CaptainKickass's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    State of Denial!
    Posts
    2,561
    Hey Rats, here's a non-paywall link to the interview with Nate Hobbs from The Athletic titled: "Nate Hobbs Q&A: Packers’ new CB explains why Rich Bissacia ‘changed my life’ with Raiders"

    Quote Originally Posted by Nate Hobbs
    This, that and the third
    I've heard and even said "This , that and the other" in my lifetime, but I've never heard it this way before: "This, that and the third." He used it a couple times in the interview.

    The most interesting part was he said Jaire reached out to him.
    Hmm.
    "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

  17. #157
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainKickass View Post
    Hey Rats, here's a non-paywall link to the interview with Nate Hobbs from The Athletic titled: "Nate Hobbs Q&A: Packers’ new CB explains why Rich Bissacia ‘changed my life’ with Raiders"



    I've heard and even said "This , that and the other" in my lifetime, but I've never heard it this way before: "This, that and the third." He used it a couple times in the interview.

    The most interesting part was he said Jaire reached out to him.
    Hmm.
    Thanks for the link.

    It would be a dumb mistake to get rid of J-Alex. You do not get rid of a shutdown corner in his prime, unless he commits some heinous crime. Sure, J-Alex is cocky as fuck, but guess what? The shutdown corner is supposed to be cocky as fuck!

  18. #158
    Wolf Pack Rat HOFer Deputy Nutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In Skin's basket
    Posts
    11,310
    Alexander was a top end corner, and then his attitude and injuries hampered his career. He can't stay healthy and it's a shoulder, a knee, a hamstring....

    He used to be super aggressive in his tackling then he popped his shoulder. I am not sure he is worth 17 million especially if he doesn't want to be in GB and is trade value with the injuries and attitude has plummeted. He is doing his best to get out of GB, let him go. I don't wish him the worst, but his time is over in GB.

  19. #159
    Quote Originally Posted by Deputy Nutz View Post
    Alexander was a top end corner, and then his attitude and injuries hampered his career. He can't stay healthy and it's a shoulder, a knee, a hamstring....

    He used to be super aggressive in his tackling then he popped his shoulder. I am not sure he is worth 17 million especially if he doesn't want to be in GB and is trade value with the injuries and attitude has plummeted. He is doing his best to get out of GB, let him go. I don't wish him the worst, but his time is over in GB.
    What makes you think J-Alex doesn’t want to be a Packer? And what attitude? By all accounts, he’s well liked by his teammates. Ain’t no so-called locker room cancer, hombre.

    Sure, the injury issue is an issue. But I bet he’s super motivated to shed that injury-prone label.

    Packers have no problems paying Clark a shitload of frogskins to make a play every blue moon. When healthy, Alexander is a bona fide shutdown corner. Keep J-Alex!

  20. #160
    I sorta agree about Jaire, but he's due a lot of money compared to what he has been worth recently. If he ain't a cancer and wants to stay a Packer, as you say, then I'd say a restructuring is in order - fixing it to where he gets a whole lot less, but maybe with performance incentives to keeping making some or all of it.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •