What is a more "brutal and painful method of advocting torutre and suffering" then shooting yourself with a gun?Originally Posted by mraynrand
What is a more "brutal and painful method of advocting torutre and suffering" then shooting yourself with a gun?Originally Posted by mraynrand
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
People who shoot themselves in the head die instantly. People who poison themselved or toss themsleves off buildings sometimes live, but are permanently disabled and suffer horribly the rest of their days. I think you are being inhumane in advocating for more painful methods of suicide.Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
I don't think Tank should own a gun, or a monkey.
I guess you are arguing that people should have the rights to bear arms so that they can shoot themselves the head. Shooting oneself in the head is brutel, whether you died instantly or not. At least those who took posion or jump off a building but still survive gets another chance to live. Failed sucide attempts are not like having AIDs. Theres a cure for it.Originally Posted by mraynrand
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
liberals also support abortion and physician assisted suicide for those who are mentally ill, but at the same time oppose capital punishment. Instead of someone shooting himself in the head, why not have a doctor help you die painlessly?Originally Posted by mraynrand
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
Remember Tank, Happiness Is a Warm Gun
You made my point for me. You support suicide for the mentally ill. I've never heard anyone who committed suicide by shooting themselves in the head complain about the pain. Have you?Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
BTW,
Had John Lennon been stabbed or poisoned, he could have died a slower, more painful and even more horrible death.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
How about you take a gun and put it to your head and pull the trigger and then write me a letter about how you felt at that moment from the next life. I am sure having a doctor help you die is less pain full than putting a bullet in your head.Originally Posted by mraynrand
But since you are not mentally ill, and you have not given anyone consents to take your life, ignore what I just wrote and live. I am sure liberals, including me, and conservatives alike will agree that it is better to live through the "the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune," than to "take ARMS against a sea of troubles."
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
I am the NRA.
If you wanna fuck me, Tank, you must be gay.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
But I don't swing that way, so you'll have to go back down to the bus station restroom to get your fix at the glory hole.
ok. Thanks for bumping up the thread.Originally Posted by the_idle_threat
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
I notice I've now become "Gun Rat." Wonder how that happened ... though I'm not complaining.
HA! Nice. "Guns dont kill people....I do"Originally Posted by Dr. Nutz
So Tanky picks a topic like guns to argue with a bunch of people who live or have lived in Wisconsin where a large portion of the people like to hunt? Its almost like he knew what reaction he would get ahead of time. (GASP)
If the US outlaws guns, I'm moving cause our military is fooked. Guns are on our heli's, planes, boats "Tanks" etc.
Maybe if you were to argue that pistols serve no useful purpose you might get a better reaction, but thats not what you were looking for now is it?
APB you have been beaten. your facts are crap and your reasoning is that of a 11th grade high school student taht plagerised his paper off of google. You have a belief that you think is right but you cant prove it.
you have been refuted many times and refuse to answer to when you are beaten. Its funny and sad in a way. funny because you now sound like a 5 year old that isnt getting his way and sad because you dad wasted a lot of money at a school that has taught you to become a drone.
Good job my little idiot I like your threads because it just makes you look dumber and dumber everytime.
*here is a light*
blaze because you need to kill those last two brain cells.
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
not in my household
50% of families own atleast 1 gun. I would say the people that have guns have several, especially hunters. I would say there are more cars, but it wouldn't surprise me if the margin was smaller thant we'd think.Originally Posted by Little Whiskey
I have two vehicles and 17 guns
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Rednecks are exceptions.Originally Posted by Little Whiskey
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.
What....Originally Posted by Anti-Polar Bear
The US government was established to allow militias to overthrown the government that impedes upon life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Go back to grade school and reread the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and Constiution again. You'd be amazed the clarity of reading it because you want to - not because you have to.
Our forefathers were great visionaries. This right, owning guns, is vital to being American.
Take a look at the laws in Florida (conceled weapons) - violent crime has gone down. If a thug knows the guy (or girl or grandma) he wants to rob could blow his head off - he'll think twice.
And are we still living in the Revolutionary Era? Do we still use militias to defend our freedom? Today, the Military, if they wanted to, could drop a nuclear bomb on an ememy and send it to kingdom come. Guns was created with the intent to kill. Gun is the most effective way to murder someone. There is no need for civilians to continue killing each others with guns. I guess to you, allowing some one the freedom to acquire a gun to murder some one else is "vital to being American."Originally Posted by Fosco33
You can not use florida's statistic alone to represent the whole nation. You are ignoring large cities such as NYC, LA, Chicago and DC, where the majority of homicides occurs. I live in Georgetown so homicide is rare, but one can still the hear sirens from the southeast part of the city every day. There is where the majority of crimes occurs. Drive by shootings, school shootings, kidnapping at gunpoint in broad daylight. Take away guns and such neighborhood would automatically become safer. Trust me, thugs do not want to fight a hard working neighborhood without their guns.
And, amongst many less famous school-related incidents, there was Columbine. Kids gets ahold of guns because their parents are free to buy them.
Self-Defense? I ask again, how many of you carry a gun with you while walking down the street? Would the odds of survival be better if an intruder isnt shooting at you from 20 feets away? If an intruder breaks into your house, wouldn't he have the advantage since he knows more about handling guns than you do? (who likely would win, your gradman with a gun in her safe or a thug robbing her with a gun in his hand?)
I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.