Fred's Slacks is a Winner!
I do think that we should have a head to head run-off between Brooks and Ingram.
We may have to apply the TT test: all football, good character, good for team chemistry, etc....
[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Ashleys out of town, but we talked about it today. I like Watkins the best here, Ashley like Jon Baldwin. We both agreed we don't see Ingram here nor do we want Ingram in this spot because James Starks and Ryan grant got it locked up. We agreed on Brooks reed who we hope with Kevin Greene, and clay Matthews to learn from he could cconceivably become clay Matthews lite. I think Ashley also did it because she thinks it would be cool for 3 of our starting linebackers to have long blonde hair. Haha
</delurk>
Don't buy your campaign against Ingram; don't buy your argument that he is not a special talent and I'm a bit surprised others are not arguing on this as well. He's been an elite college RB his college career.
You may have convinced enough in here to flip their vote from Reed to Ingram if we have another runoff.
The last second round draft pick we made at RB was Brandon Jackson....a specialist. LeShoure won't be around when we make our pick in round two and IMO he's not in a class where you consider him in round one..
If Ingram is healthy, the reason he got the majority vote in a democracy type setting is they do view him as a spcial talent and the BPA on the board. Since RB is not a primary need, the only reason those 14 would have votes for him is they do think he's a special talent and a step above the rest of the class.
If you think he's special he's the BPA; if not you go for need since you are choosing from a tier below the elite talent at OL/LB/...........etc
Last edited by Bretsky; 04-10-2011 at 05:02 PM.
LIFE IS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS; I JUST REALIZED THIS. The MILWAUKEE BUCKS have won the same number of championships over the past 50 years as the Green Bay Packers. Ten years from now, who will have more championships, and who will be the fart in the wind ?
Mark Ingram compares to Priest Holmes and Emmit Smith. Even Ladanian Tomlinson is more of that no nonsense type runner than he is a "big over power you" guy or a "quick, out maneuver you" guy. Obviously these are three great backs we're comparing him too, but that's his style. He's a complete RB. Ryan Grant has a similar style, but he can't break tackles. Ingram can. Most of the good RB's in the NFL run similar to Mark Ingram and Ingram is damn good at it. I'd take him at 32 and not think twice. I'd rather have a DL, OL or even OLB, but if the best player by far is a RB, then you have to take him.
Last edited by RashanGary; 04-10-2011 at 06:04 PM.
i just got on this thread for the first time
sorry B, but ingram is not an elite talent. he's got the big name, the heisman and played for a big team, IMO he's more emmitt smith then barry sanders. any asshole with two legs could run through the holes that emmitt got. smith had one of the best o-lines of all time. barry had shit, but his elite talent got him through.
i see the same with ingram, not really fast, not really strong, not the quickest, but he played 3 years for one of if not the best team in college football over those years. put him on toledo's team, is he still a "dominate rb"? i don't think he would be, i think he would be a JAG
i don't see ingram giving us anything we don't already have on the roster
also, while we're at it, i'd like to mention just how fucked up the whole mock draft thing is. 2 or 3 weeks ago none of us on here had even heard of brooks reed. he had a decent combine, had an ok career, but nothing special. most experts that i saw had him as a third or fourth round pick, maybe a late second. then one of the big experts put two and two together. the guy looks and plays just like CMIII, the packers need another OLB, and TT isn't afraid to reach for a guy he likes. the expert stated that under kevin green, reed would have a bright future. within a day or two about half the mock drafts out there jumped on this bandwagon and had reed going to green bay. then a few days later a few of the mocks had the teams right in front of green bay taking him. now all of a sudden i see him as a ton 15 or 20 pick. i find this hillarious
99.95 percent of the people doing the mock drafts have no clue what the hell they are doing. they just look at everyone else's and try to tweek theres a little bit to make them look unique
I would explain why Ingram's not an elite talent, but red just did it. He wasn't even the best running back on his team last year. Ingram would be an incredibly average talent were he not playing behind a dominant line, and if we took him he would be just that.
Last edited by Lurker64; 04-10-2011 at 06:38 PM.
</delurk>
Brian Cushing wasn't even the best LB on his team and he played for a powerhouse that can make guys look better, yet he turned out OK. Tom Brady wasn't even the starting QB at Michigan for much of his time there, yet he turned out OK.
If the greatest powerhouse in college football has a prospect better than Ingram, that's hardly damning.
But I see your point. I've heard him called the AJ Hawk of RB's. I'd be happy with him at 32. Better than taking Hawk at #5.
Last edited by RashanGary; 04-10-2011 at 06:47 PM.
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
Last edited by TennesseePackerBacker; 04-11-2011 at 10:38 AM.
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi
It is what it is folks, no re-vote. This isn't Bush/Gore where the election process is going to be a long, drawn out mess. Ingram is the pick!