Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should M3 rest the starters?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Rest them as needed (with safe lead)
    The Bottom Line:
    Formally Numb, same person, same views of M3

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Jimx29 View Post
      Rest them as needed (with safe lead)
      This is what most people have voted. Its a way to avoid of making a difficult choice, spltting the difference. But "safe leads" are unlikely.

      I'd say this position is about the same as "don't rest", since it keeps priority on winning regular season games.

      If the question is "which strategy is most likely to lead to Super Bowl victory", there is a reasonable argument and evidence on both sides. The reason the fans are skewed to the "don't rest" side is that it hurts to watch any loss.

      Comment


      • #33
        If there was an option for play uninjured starters like its the 3rd preseason game, I would have voted for that. It's not out fault our gameplans are more complicated than the simple answers provided by your poll.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by channtheman View Post
          I say rest guys who are slightly injured that would play in a playoff game. Otherwise, business as usual.
          This is my thought. If Woodson, Matthews, etc. are dinged up and resting will help them get ready for the playoffs, then rest them. Otherwise, all healthy bodies play.
          My house is in Georgia but Wisconsin is my home.

          Comment

          Working...
          X