I voted packers, but only on the hope that Rodgers plays again this year
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers Versus Browns Remainder of Season
Collapse
X
-
That's a weird way to put it. But you claimed Kizer is better. I see nothing to support that. I don't think either has shown their full potential, and may not anytime soon.Originally posted by yetisnowman View PostWhy would anything but Hundley playing better than Kizer make me think he was actually better than Kizer?
But consider this: Kizer was drafted to be a starter. Hundley was drafted to be a backup. That's the reality of it. Guys like Hundley aren't expected to be multiyear starters and pro bowl candidates - their expected ceiling is to manage a team while a starter is out, hopefully get more wins than losses. There's a reason Hundley was drafted in the fifth (and Kizer in the third) - they have enough warts that people don't expect them to be starters (Hundley) or start right away (Kizer). But there's no substitute for playing, and both these guys don't have the bank of experiences yet. A few guys can step in right away and be effective, most require some time. That's why guys like Moore, Hoyer, McCown stick around the league - because they can step in and run an offense while the big dog is away or hasn't been drafted yet. But no one ever thinks those guys will be the face of the team for years. Same with Hundley. If he did turn out to be pro bowl caliber starting QB material, and the successor to Rodgers it would be the biggest fuckdoggle since Tom Brady. Now they just need him to do enough right to to get more wins than losses. It looks like it may be a tall order."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
And if he can show he can be more than a game manager to step in for the starter he isn't going to want to stick around at 1265 and be Rodgers' understudy until 2020. He's going to want to start somewhere and will go elsewhere. Rodgers' eventual replacement is probably still in high school.Originally posted by mraynrand View PostThat's a weird way to put it. But you claimed Kizer is better. I see nothing to support that. I don't think either has shown their full potential, and may not anytime soon.
But consider this: Kizer was drafted to be a starter. Hundley was drafted to be a backup. That's the reality of it. Guys like Hundley aren't expected to be multiyear starters and pro bowl candidates - their expected ceiling is to manage a team while a starter is out, hopefully get more wins than losses. There's a reason Hundley was drafted in the fifth (and Kizer in the third) - they have enough warts that people don't expect them to be starters (Hundley) or start right away (Kizer). But there's no substitute for playing, and both these guys don't have the bank of experiences yet. A few guys can step in right away and be effective, most require some time. That's why guys like Moore, Hoyer, McCown stick around the league - because they can step in and run an offense while the big dog is away or hasn't been drafted yet. But no one ever thinks those guys will be the face of the team for years. Same with Hundley. If he did turn out to be pro bowl caliber starting QB material, and the successor to Rodgers it would be the biggest fuckdoggle since Tom Brady. Now they just need him to do enough right to to get more wins than losses. It looks like it may be a tall order.
Comment
-
If all we were after was a backup QB, why spend a 5th round pick on Hundley? We could have drafted Jay Ajayi instead who went two picks after Hundley. Strictly backup QB's seem to be a dime a dozen. I don't think Hundley is clearly better than Callahan or that other kid QB they had in camp this summer.One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
Comment
-
Because there are scouts and GMs who think Hundley could have been a 2nd or 3rd round pick. His numbers at UCLA were impressive.Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View PostIf all we were after was a backup QB, why spend a 5th round pick on Hundley? We could have drafted Jay Ajayi instead who went two picks after Hundley. Strictly backup QB's seem to be a dime a dozen. I don't think Hundley is clearly better than Callahan or that other kid QB they had in camp this summer.
I hope he plays better this week. He should have had a lot more time to get use to being the starter with the bye week.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
Terrible backups are a dime a dozen. If you want a talent to work with, a fifth or sixth is about the lowest cost.Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View PostIf all we were after was a backup QB, why spend a 5th round pick on Hundley? We could have drafted Jay Ajayi instead who went two picks after Hundley. Strictly backup QB's seem to be a dime a dozen. I don't think Hundley is clearly better than Callahan or that other kid QB they had in camp this summer.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment

Comment