Originally posted by texaspackerbacker
View Post
Last year, Rodgers was sacked 20 times over 16 games (1.25/game). For comparison:
Brees: 13 Sk, 9 G (1.444)
Dalton: 24, 14 (1.714)
Burrow: 32SK, 10 (3.2)
Lamar Jackson 29 Sk, 15G (1.933) - and he's mobile
Mahomes: 22Sk, 15G (1.466)
R.Wilson: 47Sk, 16G (2.9375) - he's plenty mobile, with good receivers and a shit OL.
Brady - 21Sk, 16G (1.3125)
OL matters, and GB has a good one. They also must have some pretty sharp coaches, because they've been able to move players up and down the line or play backups without missing much of a beat.
You can ignore DVOA or PFF ratings or all those other things and cling to the theory that the OL is not good, but your theory is incorrect and there's plenty of data to disprove it.
In fact, I'd like to see you provide data proving the OL is not good.
It's ok to change your mind when new facts become available. People did that when proof showed the earth was not flat.

Comment