Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Maybe, but Goodson now has a hammy and was rehabbing yesterday.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Is the story different at the end of the year if the Pack loses to the Browns instead of beating them? Or is this game just another game?
Is this game pivotal because of how bad the Browns are?
No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.
Sachi Brown out, John Dorsey leading candidate for new Browns GM
Guys on local radio are bemoaning the idea that Brown's coach Hugh Jackson has been guaranteed another year by the owner. "Nobody has been successful unless they clean house and bring in all the new guys together" they tell me. Then in the next sentence "Dorsey is the guy who brought in Aaron Rodgers."
850 WKNR "The Really Big Show" or as I like to call it "The Really BS"
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Yeah. I get hiring Dorsey. He was successful in GB and in KC.
But Hue Jackson has not demonstrated he knows what he is doing as a head coach.
The funny part will be when in three years everyone in Cleveland realizes the next QB draft pick was not All World and that Dorsey really did not make the call on Rodgers
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Packer Report
@PackerReport
No House, Goodson or Perry today. Players in pads, including Rodgers. Jake Ryan is back.
Perry has a shoulder. Goodson has a hammy. Didn't House hurt his leg/knee?
Ryan and Dial are practicing.
Last edited by pbmax; 12-07-2017 at 02:14 PM.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
That's the picture the GBPG/JSO/autoplay goddamn videos on every article/Gannett site is painting. They're acting like it will prove out their other clickbait on how the Packers without Rodgers are no better than the Browns.
It's really only pivotal because the Packers' chances of still making the playoffs go from 5% to 8% if they win or to 1% if they lose. It does nothing to validate the thesis they've been trying to advance, though a loss would almost certainly result in a lot more garbage getting pumped out of the Gannett sewer.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Time for a little majik from #7
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck