Tweet
... and trade Tramon Williams? Or,
... move Woodson to a high-bred DB role of some sort, maybe playing fewer snaps. Or,
... trade Sam Shields? Or,
... trade, release or "retire" Woodson? Or,
... keep Woodson, Williams and Shields, get rid of Underwood or Lee, and not worry about who is a starter and who's pride might be hurt by a changed role in 2011, figuring that Woodson is not likely to be back for a 15th season in 2012 and the top 3 corners will then be Williams, Asomugha and Shields in 2012?
Categories
Collapse
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by JoemailmanIt passed 29-3. Packers were one of 3 teams voting against it.
Kickoffs will remain at the 35-yard line, but the remaining 10 players on the kicking unit will line up at the opposing team's03-26-2024, 11:16 AM -
by FritzWell, this is the year - or so 99% of the fans in Detroit think - that the Lions get a big, meaningful "W" on Thanksgiving Day. Many many talking heads have reminded folks that this is reminiscent of the 1962 Turkey Day game - the 10 - 0 Packers coming in to town - and in that game the Lions' defensive line, lead by Alex Karras, shredded the Packer offensive line, dumping Bart Starr over and over and leading the Leos to a whupping of the Pack. The Lions feature a talented, deep defensive line. Ndama...11-25-2011, 02:28 PM
-
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (Undefeated)
2) 49'ers (2) (Winning % .889 > Saints .700)
Division Winners
3) Saints (4) (Winning % .700 > Giants .667)
4) Giants (3) (Winning % .667 > Cowboys .556)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (Divisional winning % .667 > Bears .500)
6) Bears (6) (Winning % .667 > Cowboys .556)
The Rest in Order: 7) Cowboys (8) (Conference Winning % .667 > Falcons .500) 8) Falc...11-15-2011, 09:33 PM -
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (5) (Better record than anyone)
2) 49'ers (2) (5-1, Buccaneers + Giants 4-2)
Division Winners
3) Buccaneers (7) (Head to head win over Saints; SOV .333 > Giants .300)
4) Giants (6) (4-2 > Redskins 3-2)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (1) (5-1 > Saints 4-2)
6) Saints (3) (4-2 > Redskins 3-2)
The Rest in Order:
7) Redskins (4) (3-2 > Bears 3-3)
8) Bears (10)...10-18-2011, 01:36 PM -
Week 5
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Lions (5) (SOV .420 > Packers .400)
2) 49'ers (3) (Conf Winning % .750 > Saints .666)
Division Winners
3) Saints (7) (Winning % .800 > Redskins .750)
4) Redskins (2) (Winning % .750 > Giants .600)
Wild Cards
5) Packers (1) (Winning % 1.00 > Giants .600)
6) Giants (6) (Conf winning % .600 > Buccaneers .500)
The Rest in Order: 7) Buccaneers (4) (...10-11-2011, 12:55 PM -
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (SOV .438 > Lions .375; Better record than anyone else)
2) Redskins (6) (SOV .333 > Giants .167; Conf % .750 > 49'ers .667)
Division Winners
3) 49'ers (4) (SOV .333 > Buccaneers .167)
4) Buccaneers (3) (Conference winning % .667 > Saints .500)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (Winning % 1.000 > Giants .750)
6) Giants (7) (Conference winning % .750 > Saints .500)
The Rest in Order: 7)...10-04-2011, 10:38 AM