Discounting the D's run game numbers is a dangerous game. Now I am all for limiting big pass plays even if it means giving something up in the run D. The improvement in scoring D this year is evidence that this has been worth it. But there is a danger in the tradeoff. Some dope at JSO today subtracted the QB rushing statistics from the Packers Run D and proclaimed them second best in the league. I couldn't find a clear headed individual that mentioned the comparison no longer was meaningful since he was comparing two completely different run categories.
Running QBs get first downs too. And Cutler is not afraid to take off. He is almost as athletic as Rodgers when running and he does not seem to run scared. He is no Vick, so he isn't scoring from 35 yards out, but he can easily keep drives alive. That keeps a defense on the field and alters the field position game. This mattered in both Bear games, the Dolphins and versus the Eagles. It matters more versus the Bears given the ST advantage.
It did not matter versus the Falcons because the offense was going through the Falcon secondary like a knife through butter. Rodgers is not likely to have that kind of success versus the Bears D.
They need to keep the Bears run game in check so that not every Packer drive starts inside their own 20. If it does, the game will look like Week 17.
Categories
Collapse
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by JoemailmanIt passed 29-3. Packers were one of 3 teams voting against it.
Kickoffs will remain at the 35-yard line, but the remaining 10 players on the kicking unit will line up at the opposing team's03-26-2024, 11:16 AM -
by FritzWell, this is the year - or so 99% of the fans in Detroit think - that the Lions get a big, meaningful "W" on Thanksgiving Day. Many many talking heads have reminded folks that this is reminiscent of the 1962 Turkey Day game - the 10 - 0 Packers coming in to town - and in that game the Lions' defensive line, lead by Alex Karras, shredded the Packer offensive line, dumping Bart Starr over and over and leading the Leos to a whupping of the Pack. The Lions feature a talented, deep defensive line. Ndama...11-25-2011, 02:28 PM
-
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (Undefeated)
2) 49'ers (2) (Winning % .889 > Saints .700)
Division Winners
3) Saints (4) (Winning % .700 > Giants .667)
4) Giants (3) (Winning % .667 > Cowboys .556)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (Divisional winning % .667 > Bears .500)
6) Bears (6) (Winning % .667 > Cowboys .556)
The Rest in Order: 7) Cowboys (8) (Conference Winning % .667 > Falcons .500) 8) Falc...11-15-2011, 09:33 PM -
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (5) (Better record than anyone)
2) 49'ers (2) (5-1, Buccaneers + Giants 4-2)
Division Winners
3) Buccaneers (7) (Head to head win over Saints; SOV .333 > Giants .300)
4) Giants (6) (4-2 > Redskins 3-2)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (1) (5-1 > Saints 4-2)
6) Saints (3) (4-2 > Redskins 3-2)
The Rest in Order:
7) Redskins (4) (3-2 > Bears 3-3)
8) Bears (10)...10-18-2011, 01:36 PM -
Week 5
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Lions (5) (SOV .420 > Packers .400)
2) 49'ers (3) (Conf Winning % .750 > Saints .666)
Division Winners
3) Saints (7) (Winning % .800 > Redskins .750)
4) Redskins (2) (Winning % .750 > Giants .600)
Wild Cards
5) Packers (1) (Winning % 1.00 > Giants .600)
6) Giants (6) (Conf winning % .600 > Buccaneers .500)
The Rest in Order: 7) Buccaneers (4) (...10-11-2011, 12:55 PM -
NFC
First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (SOV .438 > Lions .375; Better record than anyone else)
2) Redskins (6) (SOV .333 > Giants .167; Conf % .750 > 49'ers .667)
Division Winners
3) 49'ers (4) (SOV .333 > Buccaneers .167)
4) Buccaneers (3) (Conference winning % .667 > Saints .500)
Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (Winning % 1.000 > Giants .750)
6) Giants (7) (Conference winning % .750 > Saints .500)
The Rest in Order: 7)...10-04-2011, 10:38 AM
