Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

10 THINGS I THINK from LAMBEAU TODAY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I disagree with Justin Harrell. You can run right at the guy because he doesn't hold the point of attack very well and he doesn't have much of a push up field. He can fight off a double team but by the time he is done fighting it the play is over. Right now he is easily compared to Jamal Reynolds.


    We just have to agree to disagree. Harell was holding off two blockers on several plays yesterday which allowed LB's to come in and make a play. Reynolds was just manhandled most of the time he was in the game.

    As many in here know I was never fond of the Harrell pick; and while I'm still disappointed in him so far overall he has shown me some potential when he learns how to play.

    I never saw that in Reynolds
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Bretsky
      I disagree with Justin Harrell. You can run right at the guy because he doesn't hold the point of attack very well and he doesn't have much of a push up field. He can fight off a double team but by the time he is done fighting it the play is over. Right now he is easily compared to Jamal Reynolds.


      We just have to agree to disagree. Harell was holding off two blockers on several plays yesterday which allowed LB's to come in and make a play. Reynolds was just manhandled most of the time he was in the game.

      As many in here know I was never fond of the Harrell pick; and while I'm still disappointed in him so far overall he has shown me some potential when he learns how to play.

      I never saw that in Reynolds
      Reynolds made you wonder how he was drafted at all, let alone in the first round.

      Comment


      • #18
        I'm on the Justin Harrell Bandwagon. He's not a good player yet, but I see him make plays now and then, and he holds-up physically. Sometimes he takes himself out of plays, but that is experience.

        I think the forgotten man on the D-line is Colin Cole. He's a qaulity rotation guy, better than the rookies. It hurt to lose him too.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Bretsky
          I'm still disappointed in him so far overall he has shown me some potential when he learns how to play.
          This is exactly how I see him. I expected more coming out. He struggled early, but has sort of picked it up a little. Still, I think it's very easy to say he's a talented young player who's just scratching the surface. There are enough flashes to feel optimistic.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
            I think the forgotten man on the D-line is Colin Cole. He's a qaulity rotation guy, better than the rookies. It hurt to lose him too.
            I think Cole will be forgotten completely next year, because he will be playing somewhere else.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Patler
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              I think the forgotten man on the D-line is Colin Cole. He's a qaulity rotation guy, better than the rookies. It hurt to lose him too.
              I think Cole will be forgotten completely next year, because he will be playing somewhere else.
              I think so too; I've seen enough of Daniel Muhr to think he can be Cole like
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Bretsky
                Originally posted by Patler
                Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                I think the forgotten man on the D-line is Colin Cole. He's a qaulity rotation guy, better than the rookies. It hurt to lose him too.
                I think Cole will be forgotten completely next year, because he will be playing somewhere else.
                I think so too; I've seen enough of Daniel Muhr to think he can be Cole like
                Cole will never be anything more than he is right now. He can be a piece of a team, but eventually on a good team, if the position is otherwise crowded, those types of players are replaced by a young player with potential to be something more. I have no doubt that Cole will be playing somewhere, I just think younger players like Muir and Harrell will be given his snaps in GB because they have to be given a chance to bebetter than what Cole is.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Hey guys I am not new I lurk A LOT so I guess this would be my first post. I wanted to first say that I love this board,there are some very fine football minds on here. Then there are some like me that kave usually good football sense,but I drink that wonderful PACKER KOOL-AID so you know how it can be. Anyway I wanted to say that I agre with whoever said that if Nall had ben given the chances that Rodgers had he would be the #2 now. Sorry for any of you A.Rodgers fans but come on,he sucks. When he does play he needs a month to heal his aching mangina. I think given the snaps in practice Nall will become more familiar with things and if needed,would be a very good back up. But we all know that will not be needed. Because Favre will be healthy right through the Superbowl(just poured more kool aid).

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Whats up man, welcome to the forum.

                    Yeah, Im starting to worry about ARod also. He is making Cali look bad.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X