Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mark Roman

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mark Roman

    Kind of interesting. San Fran gave Roman an extension before the year. Wonder if they regret it now--even though it wasn't that big.

    Roman = 61 tackles, 0 sacks, 0 interceptions, 0 forced fumbles, 4 passes defensed
    Bigby = 86 tackles, 0 sacks, 5 interceptions, 3 forced fumbles, 9 passes defensed

    As much as we can harp on Bigby, I think he's been a clear upgrade over that position from the last two years--although that's saying very little.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  • #2
    Re: Mark Roman

    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
    As much as we can harp on Bigby, I think he's been a clear upgrade over that position from the last two years--although that's saying very little.
    Hard to compare a guy in the SF secondary with a guy in the GB secondary. Most teams stopped passing on the 49ers by the 2nd quarter.

    However, I do think Bigby is an upgrade to Roman...hard not to be.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

    Comment


    • #3
      If Bigby's dumb ass would turn around once in a while he would have more picks and be considered really damn good.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by MadtownPacker
        If Bigby's dumb ass would turn around once in a while he would have more picks and be considered really damn good.
        Guy still commits to many dumb penalties. And he's a liability in coverage.

        I don't know, I like Bigby, but I'm more than willing to give Rouse a go if Bigby wants to much money. I don't see him as a key figure on our defense.
        "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

        Comment


        • #5
          Rouse is actually going to be in line to replace Collins. I think Collins is ok but he is not worth 3 or 4 million a year for his play at safety.

          Bigby will have another year to show improvement as a starter and I think he will. Play action is a bitch for any safety in their first year.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
            Rouse is actually going to be in line to replace Collins. I think Collins is ok but he is not worth 3 or 4 million a year for his play at safety.
            Who is going to pay Collins $3-4M a year? He hasn't done anything.

            Besides, wouldn't Bigby have to sign a new contract before Collins does? I would think Bigby is more likely to earn a big FA deal due to his stats, and more likely to pull down a sizeable deal at this point.
            My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
              Rouse is actually going to be in line to replace Collins. I think Collins is ok but he is not worth 3 or 4 million a year for his play at safety.

              Bigby will have another year to show improvement as a starter and I think he will. Play action is a bitch for any safety in their first year.
              Collins needs a good coach to do well. He's go the raw athleticism, but he needs to be coached well to be a good player. Get rid of Schotty, and then I think he could flourish.
              "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

              Comment


              • #8
                I believe if you think of Bigby as a first year player who is likely to improve, you'd be happy with him. If you think he's already reached his ceiling, then you'd think he needs to be replaced. I wonder what people would think if he were a second round pick last year and hadn't played much or missed the year because of injury.
                "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                  I believe if you think of Bigby as a first year player who is likely to improve, you'd be happy with him.
                  I think he can improve. I just don't think we need all of our safeties to be LB types that tend more to run support than they do pass defense. If Bigby were paired with a safety who was strong in coverage, then I'm fine with what Bigby brings.

                  You need a LeRoy Butler (in the box) safety and a Eugene Robinson/Darren Sharper (deep coverage) safety. I think your defense struggles if you have two of both...which I think is what we have with Bigby and Collins, who both excel in the box IMO.
                  My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    ever since collins came back from injury i think hes played some excellent ball

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What's Antuan Edwards doing these days??? Maybe SF can sign him too.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Bigby has shown a lot. This is his first year as a starter.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jerry Tagge
                          What's Antuan Edwards doing these days??? Maybe SF can sign him too.
                          Dude has been with about 5 teams in the last year or so. I think he's been sitting at home all season long.

                          BTW, nice avatar.
                          "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The comparision should not be with the back up Bigby and Tod Franz but

                            Marquand Manuel (more expensive than Roman) and
                            pre-injury Marvel Underwood.


                            Roman is one of 64 starting Safeties in the NFL who was cut too early by the Packers. They could have kept him through training camp.
                            The problem with Roman was he recognized the mistake in signing Manuel who was Roman's back up in Cincinnati. He told Ted Thompson it was a mistake. Ted cut Roman for rocking the boat. It was a mistake. Roman is better than Manuel and always has been.

                            Manuel has never beat out the competition in training camp. His starts came after injuries to Ken Hamin and Marvel Underwood.

                            Roman is in the bottom third of NFL starting safeties.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I was never on the Manual bandwagon, not at all. I thought the guy had one or two good games his entire career. I don't know the stats from 2006 but it sure looked like to me that he was a downgrade from Roman.

                              I like Rouse, he really has shown the potential. I like Collins too but he hasn't really made a statement since his rookie year. Over all, I think our safeties still get burned too much. Could just be lack of experience. If that's the case, then Collins, Bigby and Rouse should only get better in our scheme.
                              "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
                              – Benjamin Franklin

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X