So the tapes destroyed by Goodell included the new alleged in question from 2002?
I apologize if I'm lost completely, but reading that article above, all I got from it was that the same thing may have happened, someone made a call. Has there actually been a tape recovered from the Pats possesion that they are talkng about, the eve before SB 36, that has the Rams walkthrough on it? If so, I sincerely apologize for lengthening this discussion. If not, it's not good enough for me to just claim something happened, there still should be physical evidence.
On a side note, I don't like the Pats or Bellicheck. But, I don't like guilty judgements handed down without proof either.
I apologize if I'm lost completely, but reading that article above, all I got from it was that the same thing may have happened, someone made a call. Has there actually been a tape recovered from the Pats possesion that they are talkng about, the eve before SB 36, that has the Rams walkthrough on it? If so, I sincerely apologize for lengthening this discussion. If not, it's not good enough for me to just claim something happened, there still should be physical evidence.
On a side note, I don't like the Pats or Bellicheck. But, I don't like guilty judgements handed down without proof either.


Comment