Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tag Candidates

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by twoseven
    So basically a team has to have multiple FAs to decide upon at tag time to be losing one to FA.
    If I understand what you are saying, not necessarily. Teams often do not use their franchise or transition tags, so even with only one FA they can lose him.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Patler
      Originally posted by twoseven
      So basically a team has to have multiple FAs to decide upon at tag time to be losing one to FA.
      If I understand what you are saying, not necessarily. Teams often do not use their franchise or transition tags, so even with only one FA they can lose him.
      Yeah, I understand that part, ala we just let CW walk this year.

      No, I meant if multiple FAs want to test the market their current team has little that they can do with only one franchise tag. I realize they could go with the transitional, but that's hardly the deterrent that the franchise is. If three FAs want to test the market at least one will go scott free.

      Question becomes how is Lance Briggs guaranteed to go free, this seems to be the consensus all last season?

      I am also just wondering to myself what it will take for Jared Allen to get to FA this year, it seems KC has him for awhile if they so choose.

      Comment


      • #48
        I thought with Briggs, they tagged him with the promise that they wouldn't do it again. They do that sometimes to placate a player who really doesn't want to be tagged.
        "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by MJZiggy
          I thought with Briggs, they tagged him with the promise that they wouldn't do it again. They do that sometimes to placate a player who really doesn't want to be tagged.
          They promised him? Wouldn't that be funny if they tagged him tomorrow..

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by MJZiggy
            I thought with Briggs, they tagged him with the promise that they wouldn't do it again.
            I think that promise was also written into the actual contract...even though the player is tagged, he still has to sign a contract. I doubt the Bears could legally tag him again...unless Briggs has a bunch of inept agents working for him.
            My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

            Comment


            • #51
              Well, it IS Chicago....
              "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

              Comment


              • #52
                My fault, they tagged Grossman today, Briggs is free as a bird.

                Comment


                • #53
                  They tagged GROSSMAN??? LMAO!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! (so I guess this means Barak can stop asking to borrow Favre?)
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by MJZiggy
                    They tagged GROSSMAN??? LMAO!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! (so I guess this means Barak can stop asking to borrow Favre?)
                    Well, it IS Chicago....

                    Gotcha, sorry.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by twoseven
                      My fault, they tagged Grossman today, Briggs is free as a bird.
                      Tagged Grossman, cut Muhammed, Da Barz braintrust is hard at work! That's great for us. Those boys are dangerous when they try to think.

                      The poster was right, they'll be 10 or more guys tagged by next week.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by MJZiggy
                        They tagged GROSSMAN??? LMAO!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! (so I guess this means Barak can stop asking to borrow Favre?)


                        Who the hell was going to sign him? Some Arena team league?





                        da Bears

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          I was kidding about that hump Grossman, his own mother wouldn't tag him.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            It's ok, the laughter was worth it... Every now and again you need a good belly laugh. Proven medical benefits and all that...
                            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy
                              They tagged GROSSMAN??? LMAO!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! (so I guess this means Barak can stop asking to borrow Favre?)


                              Who the hell was going to sign him? Some Arena team league?





                              da Bears
                              The Dolphins or the Falcons. So, you were right in your assumption.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by MJZiggy
                                They tagged GROSSMAN??? LMAO!!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! (so I guess this means Barak can stop asking to borrow Favre?)


                                I think this may have been a PackerRats hoax. I can't find a confirming report.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X