Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Favre return isn't a given

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Favre return isn't a given



    The Brett Favre Retirement Watch has generated a collective yawn this offseason.


    It’s not that people don’t care, but maybe Packers fans have endured the “will he?” or “won’t he?” scenario so often they figure it’s not worth the energy.

    Fretting about Favre’s status won’t change his mind, and it won’t speed up the process.

    But after the Packers came so agonizingly close to the Super Bowl, shouldn’t fans spend their waking hours hoping Favre returns for one more title run? Instead, there’s a feeling of calm among the Packers faithful.

    It’s possible a false sense of security has set in because the evidence supporting Favre’s return is so overwhelming. Conventional wisdom says the decision is a no-brainer.

    The Packers are a bona fide Super Bowl contender. Favre remains remarkably healthy and played at the top of his game in 2007. Favre has a strong relationship with coach Mike McCarthy. The Packers’ offense, ranked No. 2 in the NFL, has the potential to improve with the development of young receivers and the emergence of running back Ryan Grant. A $12 million base salary can’t be dismissed.

    How could Favre walk away from all of that? Well, he might have his reasons:



    There is nothing left to prove. Grasping for another Super Bowl ring is a noble goal, but Favre has been there and done that. Winning another championship would elevate Favre’s legacy, but it’s already in the stratosphere. He will go down as one of the best quarterbacks to play the game.


    Favre’s bank account, like his legacy, doesn’t need enhancing. He can live comfortably for the rest of his life without earning another dime. If Favre needs a little spending money, his image and Hall of Fame career would attract lucrative endorsement deals for a long time.


    Spending his retirement days in the warm climate of Mississippi, Favre never again would have to brave the brutal Midwest winters that feature below-zero temperatures, bone-chilling winds and frozen fingers.


    Offseasons would involve carefree days of golfing, fishing, hunting and relaxing poolside instead of putting his 38-year-old body through rigorous, gut-busting workouts. The thought of not having to fly to Wisconsin for tedious minicamp and organized team activity sessions in May and June might sound appealing.


    After being exposed to fame, glitz and glitter for almost two decades, the thought of a normal lifestyle would be attractive. Not having to split his grade-school daughter’s academic year between Wisconsin and Mississippi would be a big plus.


    The theory that retirement would get boring and a man only can mow so much grass before needing a diversion is something everyone must face. Sometime soon, Favre will confront that dilemma. Thus, he must ask himself whether putting off the inevitable is reason enough to play another season.

    I remain convinced Favre’s competitive nature will lure him back. But if the decision is so obvious, why didn’t he announce his intention to return soon after the season ended? He’s at least considering the prospect of life after football.

    Favre likely will declare his plans in the next two weeks. If it’s like recent years, he will phone longtime friend Al Jones of the Biloxi Sun Herald and tell him the good tidings Packers fans want to hear. If it’s something different, news conferences will be scheduled, special editions will roll off the presses, ESPN will churn out hours of tributes, and the world as we know it never will quite be the same

  • #2
    COOOOOOOOME BAAAAAAAAAAAAACK PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!!!! Even if A-rod is a capable starter in this league I dont care, I dont wanna see it yet..

    Comment


    • #3
      Favre has ALWAYS said that he would keep playing if:

      He felt he was still playing at a high level - CHECK

      He was having fun playing the game - CHECK (even more this year than maybe ever)

      The team could be a winner - CHECK

      HE IS COMING BACK

      Comment


      • #4
        Arod's showing in pre-season and how he looked off the bench in Dallas are most of the reason people are not on the edge of their Favre seats. IMO, just as long as he lets them know before free agency is my only concern, I want TT to have every freedom at that time to do what he has to do.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Favre return isn't a given

          Originally posted by Brando19
          http://www.packersnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080212/PKR07/80212224/1989


          Spending his retirement days in the warm climate of Mississippi, Favre never again would have to brave the brutal Midwest winters that feature below-zero temperatures, bone-chilling winds and frozen fingers.
          I've lived here for 40+ years and have yet to freeze any fingers.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by twoseven
            Arod's showing in pre-season and how he looked off the bench in Dallas are most of the reason people are not on the edge of their Favre seats. IMO, just as long as he lets them know before free agency is my only concern, I want TT to have every freedom at that time to do what he has to do.
            TT has said a hundred times that he's not going to base any decisions or choices on who the quarterback is. Even if he doesn't have a decision, he will do what he needs to do to make the team better. If he thinks a backup qb will be necessary once Favre is gone, he will get one regardless.
            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MJZiggy
              Originally posted by twoseven
              Arod's showing in pre-season and how he looked off the bench in Dallas are most of the reason people are not on the edge of their Favre seats. IMO, just as long as he lets them know before free agency is my only concern, I want TT to have every freedom at that time to do what he has to do.
              TT has said a hundred times that he's not going to base any decisions or choices on who the quarterback is. Even if he doesn't have a decision, he will do what he needs to do to make the team better. If he thinks a backup qb will be necessary once Favre is gone, he will get one regardless.
              When you think about it, why should it matter who the QB is? Does Favre need WRs more or less than Rodgers does? Does he need linemen more or less than Rodgers? RBs? It certainly has no impact on TT's plans for the defense, or special teams.

              The only affect it would have is that if Favre comes back, they don't need a #2 QB, and can maybe look at drafting a guy for #3. If Favre does not come back, TT may have a little more interest in signing a veteran who would be capable of stepping in if Rodgers went out, even if he still drafts a QB "project". Other than that, it really shouldn't matter who the QB is.

              Comment


              • #8
                I originally had no doubt that Brett would come back, given the year he has had. But then 2 things happened that raised doubt that he will (this is my very scientific deduction) - Tony Dungy and Mike Holmgren announced they were comming back.

                I was 1005 convinced that Brett was comming back, and that both Dungy and Holmgren would retire. I was wrong on 2 of them, and now fear it may be a clean sweep.

                Boy do I hope I'm wrong (or right on one of them!
                "Every new beginning comes from some other beginnings end."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Patler
                  Originally posted by MJZiggy
                  Originally posted by twoseven
                  Arod's showing in pre-season and how he looked off the bench in Dallas are most of the reason people are not on the edge of their Favre seats. IMO, just as long as he lets them know before free agency is my only concern, I want TT to have every freedom at that time to do what he has to do.
                  TT has said a hundred times that he's not going to base any decisions or choices on who the quarterback is. Even if he doesn't have a decision, he will do what he needs to do to make the team better. If he thinks a backup qb will be necessary once Favre is gone, he will get one regardless.
                  When you think about it, why should it matter who the QB is? Does Favre need WRs more or less than Rodgers does? Does he need linemen more or less than Rodgers? RBs? It certainly has no impact on TT's plans for the defense, or special teams.

                  The only affect it would have is that if Favre comes back, they don't need a #2 QB, and can maybe look at drafting a guy for #3. If Favre does not come back, TT may have a little more interest in signing a veteran who would be capable of stepping in if Rodgers went out, even if he still drafts a QB "project". Other than that, it really shouldn't matter who the QB is.
                  Isn't that what I just said?
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well, his house isn't up for sale.... so, he's coming back

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      One thing I agree with that the article states is that there is a sense of clam this year among the Packer faithful. The past few years everyone was anxious. You would think after coming so close to the SB people would be more anxious. I think the Packers will be fine whether or not Favre retires.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by MJZiggy
                        Originally posted by Patler
                        Originally posted by MJZiggy
                        Originally posted by twoseven
                        Arod's showing in pre-season and how he looked off the bench in Dallas are most of the reason people are not on the edge of their Favre seats. IMO, just as long as he lets them know before free agency is my only concern, I want TT to have every freedom at that time to do what he has to do.
                        TT has said a hundred times that he's not going to base any decisions or choices on who the quarterback is. Even if he doesn't have a decision, he will do what he needs to do to make the team better. If he thinks a backup qb will be necessary once Favre is gone, he will get one regardless.
                        When you think about it, why should it matter who the QB is? Does Favre need WRs more or less than Rodgers does? Does he need linemen more or less than Rodgers? RBs? It certainly has no impact on TT's plans for the defense, or special teams.

                        The only affect it would have is that if Favre comes back, they don't need a #2 QB, and can maybe look at drafting a guy for #3. If Favre does not come back, TT may have a little more interest in signing a veteran who would be capable of stepping in if Rodgers went out, even if he still drafts a QB "project". Other than that, it really shouldn't matter who the QB is.
                        Isn't that what I just said?
                        Yup, I was just agreeing with you and TT. (I try to keep only the BEST company! )

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by GBRulz
                          Well, his house isn't up for sale.... so, he's coming back
                          Does his daughters to go school half a year in GB then half a year in Mississippi?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Well, his house isn't up for sale.... so, he's coming back Very Happy
                            Stalker !!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I believe fans now realize that Favre is no longer the difference maker, whether or not he is better than Rodgers, The loss to the Giants was an awakening for some, demonstrating that even with Favre, and being just one game away from the Super Bowl, playing at home; having Favre didn't matter. Watching Manning perform efficiently when Favre didn't, under conditions in which most thought the advantage would go to Favre, raises an underlying doubt. In that game, on that day, would Rodgers maybe have performed better???

                              Doubts like that make the urgency of Favre's return less intense. I think many now realize it may not happen again with Favre, and so they are willing to move on, or accept his return. It isn't that important to them either way.

                              The belief that Favre absolutely would get the Packers to the Super Bowl if they just got close enough is now gone.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X