Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EXTREMELY Deep at OT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by b bulldog
    Sorry Tyrone but once again you look like your wrong. You can say 6' and above all you want but the truth is in todays NFL, your considered small if your 6', 180lbs and play wr. This was the reason why people are dropping quotes like his height and weight are too small and will hinder him at this next level. If you need quotes on this, I'll get them for you just to prove I'm right again.
    Ok, if six is small, what size are the moss brothers at five nine. My god, how can you just ignore reality?

    Sorry, but you are wrong. There are BIG receviers and there are small receivers.

    Bulldog, i've spanked you enough. Your point, which you've switched now a couple of times, was about talent and struggling.

    First, i proved that the players didn't have the talent as compared to MM (of course that was prior to discovering he PERHAPS didnt' have the talent)..sorry, but slow big receivers aren't the same as supposed fast ones. And, that they didn't struggle. You equate being injured as struggling.

    It is laughable to watch you twist and squirm.

    Comment


    • #92
      Just like when you said Brady hasn't played well in his last 7 playoff games and that Pryor wasn't considered the best prospect this year, the Packers having the same talent level as the Chargers and now this
      Pass Jessica's Law and keep the predators behind bars for 25 years minimum. Vote out liberal, SP judges. Enforce all immigrant laws!

      Comment


      • #93
        Like I said, these talent evaluators are the ones calling MM small and he is 6', 180. My point from the begin ning was dead on, UM WR's with better talent in college have done little in the NFL. Facts are facts,
        Pass Jessica's Law and keep the predators behind bars for 25 years minimum. Vote out liberal, SP judges. Enforce all immigrant laws!

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by b bulldog
          Like I said, these talent evaluators are the ones calling MM small and he is 6', 180. My point from the begin ning was dead on, UM WR's with better talent in college have done little in the NFL. Facts are facts,
          If MM is anything like Braylon Edwards he would be a steal at #30
          To much of a good thing is an awesome thing

          Comment


          • #95
            Annoyed by partial?? Partial is a good guy
            Pass Jessica's Law and keep the predators behind bars for 25 years minimum. Vote out liberal, SP judges. Enforce all immigrant laws!

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by b bulldog
              Just like when you said Brady hasn't played well in his last 7 playoff games and that Pryor wasn't considered the best prospect this year, the Packers having the same talent level as the Chargers and now this
              wow. you sure have a poor memory. Brady hasn't played well in All of his last 7 games. Perhaps you missed the superbowl. I never said every game, i listed specific games.

              Pryor. Um, that isn't what i said. You said he was "can't miss" and i said find one scout or coach that used that term. You couldn't.

              I am more than aware that he is the top recruit. It is on every
              board. But, no college scout ever said "can't miss."

              It is quite sad the way you distort the truth. Do i need to find the exact posts and let everyone see how you are quickly descending into woody/merlin territory?

              BTW, when did i ever compare the pack talent to the chargers?

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Partial
                This is a good draft. Lots of talent.
                Can anybody recall a draft that this couldn't be said about? I'm sure that there are certainly drafts that are stronger than others, particularly at the elite ranks and particularly at certain positions, but there's generally a lot of talent, it's just not usually evenly distributed.
                </delurk>

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Lurker64
                  Originally posted by Partial
                  This is a good draft. Lots of talent.
                  Can anybody recall a draft that this couldn't be said about? I'm sure that there are certainly drafts that are stronger than others, particularly at the elite ranks and particularly at certain positions, but there's generally a lot of talent, it's just not usually evenly distributed.
                  Actually back in 73 the draft was terrible. Most teams just passed. I think only 2 players made anybodies roster.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X