If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Oops; sorry. Fanecca is 30 or 31 I think. He's an all pro and a nasty player. Perfect fit in any scheme. Honestly, the true reason not many pursued him is $$$. He's going to get 7-8 MIL per year and many teams still don't want to pay an OG that much, especially at that age.
That's pretty much it. When he inks his deal with the Jets, Faneca will be the highest paid offensive lineman in football.
The highest paid offensive lineman in football should not be a 31 year old guard. If you're going to break the bank on a lineman, it's on a 26 year old Left Tackle or something.
As others have noted, it's still "stupid money" time. If we can get him at a good price, he'd be a player. The problem at G is we have some interesting choices, guys that might just develop into a good player. It'll be hard to figure who gets cut.
I'd prefer Jacob Bell as well; but I'm convinced he's going to get more money that TT is willing to spend so that is why I think Scott might be a nice consolation prize.
Here are some recent comments
Word is ...
Jacob Bell, G
Free Agent On Rams' radar March 2: With Alan Faneca off the market, the Rams have turned their sights on Bell, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Bell, the Titans' starting left guard for three of the past four seasons, is scheduled to pay a free-agent visit to Rams Park on Monday. Bell and Indianapolis' Jake Scott are widely considered the best guards in this year's free agency pool other than Faneca
The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
But because Williams was traded, he is listed under the "Lost/Released" column as "traded for '08 2nd" I think he should be in the "Gains" column, too, as "Franchised-but traded for '08 2nd".
Williams was traded!? How come there aren't some 200-post-long threads about this, and at least a couple polls????
Damn, PackerRats is sagging, I expect to be able to read the thread titles and keep up.
Williams for a 2nd rounder doesn't sound very good to me. I'd rather have an established player than a 2nd round pick. But I don't doubt that was his market value.
But because Williams was traded, he is listed under the "Lost/Released" column as "traded for '08 2nd" I think he should be in the "Gains" column, too, as "Franchised-but traded for '08 2nd".
Williams was traded!? How come there aren't some 200-post-long threads about this, and at least a couple polls????
Damn, PackerRats is sagging, I expect to be able to read the thread titles and keep up.
Williams for a 2nd rounder doesn't sound very good to me. I'd rather have an established player than a 2nd round pick. But I don't doubt that was his market value.
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
We dont have that many threads on a second tier topped out player
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Im just breaking balls...yeah I have been watching a lot of the Sopranos.
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
As others have noted, it's still "stupid money" time. If we can get him at a good price, he'd be a player. The problem at G is we have some interesting choices, guys that might just develop into a good player. It'll be hard to figure who gets cut.
I'd prefer Jacob Bell as well; but I'm convinced he's going to get more money that TT is willing to spend so that is why I think Scott might be a nice consolation prize.
Here are some recent comments
Word is ...
Jacob Bell, G
Free Agent On Rams' radar March 2: With Alan Faneca off the market, the Rams have turned their sights on Bell, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Bell, the Titans' starting left guard for three of the past four seasons, is scheduled to pay a free-agent visit to Rams Park on Monday. Bell and Indianapolis' Jake Scott are widely considered the best guards in this year's free agency pool other than Faneca
Well, we're on the same page, B. That must mean this is all wrong, eh?
Bell is an LG. That would map to our needs better. The Zone blocking that we run (which ain't the ZBS, but that another story) would be no problem for him. I, too, think Bell will get paid at a high rate. A rate higher than our current Oline lads are being paid and we got Tausch coming up.
A lot of teams would like to add a 4 year guard who knows what he's doing
I still can't figure out why Bell is in Fisher's dog house. Tennessee has all kinds of cap room. They could sign 4 "Bells" and still be in good cap shape. Bell must have pissed somebody off.
Have you seen the list of FAs this team will have after the 2009 season? It's long. We're going to need the extra cap room soon. Those guys will need to be extended this offseason or next--or we risk losing them.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment