Questions for 2008

[Deputy Nutz]

Re: Questions for 2008

I get a pretty good read on people. As y,all get to know me you'll see I'm a decent analyst. I pay attention.

I knew all along he was Larry Zonka.

[woodbuck27]

Re: Questions for 2008

I get a pretty good read on people. As y,all get to know me you'll see I'm a decent analyst. I pay attention.

My bear is a whole lot smarter than your bear junior.

[woodbuck27]

Re: Questions for 2008

I get a pretty good read on people. As y,all get to know me you'll see I'm a decent analyst. I pay attention.

Smoke up on this Scott.

Then there's the Scott Campbell style wanna be's or snafoo's or ''what in the 'H' is going on in this NFL world?'' types.

I've discovered that.

It's difficult for a snafoo to read a comic book with any clear comprehension.

[Scott Campbell]

Well, I guess that's supposed to be some kind of an insult. I'm not quite sure what language its in, but I imagine there are some pretty good zingers in there - somewhere.


Woody's acting a little angry over the Favre news. I guess he needs to lash out, and I am here for him.

[Bretsky]

Re: Questions for 2008

1. Was this team all Favre or was the team a bigger part of it?
2. Is Ted Thompson for real or was he riding Brett's coattails?
3. Was Aaron Rodgers a wasted pick, a great one or somewhere in between?
4. Is Harrell a dud and a waste of a mid first round pick?


1. I think the team had a big part and this years record will show that
2. I think Ted Thompson is for real. I think this team is going to be good for a long time.
3. I'm getting optimistic about Rodgers. I'm trying to hold back my homeristic optimism, but after watching that Cowboy game over and over and reading about Rodgers drive and work ethic, I'm going to say it turns into on of Thompsons best picks
4. I think Harrell is going to kick ass this year.

There, I'm the biggest homer on this site

If there were such a thing as a TT Troll you'd be the one

[Bretsky]

Re: Questions for 2008

1. Was this team all Favre or was the team a bigger part of it?
2. Is Ted Thompson for real or was he riding Brett's coattails?
3. Was Aaron Rodgers a wasted pick, a great one or somewhere in between?
4. Is Harrell a dud and a waste of a mid first round pick?

1. A major part of 13-3 was the play of Favre, but TT added the talent around him for the opportunity

2. TT is for real; he's the perfect GM for rebuilding and life After Favre

3. Not sure; I think he's brittle. He has talent, but I'm not convinced that he can stay healthy enough long enough to be effective.

4. Not sure; he seems like a run stuffer. I'm not sure he'll develop into the dominant DL I'd want in a first round pick.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Re: Questions for 2008

Good questions JH.


I get a pretty good read on people. As Y'all get to know me you'll see I'm a decent analyst. I pay attention. I see it and call it just that way.

Exactly how do you get your read on TT? Magic? You haven't met him, you haven't talked with him, you don't know anybody who has, you don't know anybody that is privy to his thoughts.

To think you can get a read on someone based on limited exposure thru the MEDIA is asinine at best.

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Questions for 2008

......

[chain_gang]

Re: Questions for 2008

1. Was this team all Favre or was the team a bigger part of it?
2. Is Ted Thompson for real or was he riding Brett's coattails?
3. Was Aaron Rodgers a wasted pick, a great one or somewhere in between?
4. Is Harrell a dud and a waste of a mid first round pick?

1. It was a combination, for all the questions about their talent on Offense before the start of the year, they ended up with at least three playmakers on offense. Favre took advantage of the talent, and hopefully Rodgers will too.

2. TT is great at stockpile depth that can fill in for an injured starter, but it remains to be seen if he can find solid starters through the draft and not just replaceable ones. Hawk is solid, and so is Jennings, the jury's out on Rodgers and Harrell. We'll need starting tackles soon, corners are getting up their, safety is a question, Driver is getting older. As I said, he's done great finding solid backups, but we're still getting pretty old at some key skill positions, and have a few ?'s at others. I think he'll come through, though.

3. Rodgers, it's still early, but I've like him since his days at Cal. His arm strength has improved, has good mobility, accuracy I'm not totally sure about yet. It's seems every offseason he has improved, I expect him to improve quite a bit during this offseason, especially getting all the reps now. I'll say a good pick.

4. Harrell, I don't know, I was on the WTF bandwagon when we drafted him(Really wanted Dwayne Bowe aka Sterling Sharpe v2.0), but he does seem that he can be a solid run stuffer. That alone would make him at #16 alright with me, can never have enough pilely fat bodies to clog up the middle.

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Questions for 2008

Exactly how do you get your read on TT? Magic?

Tyrone you moron - he already told you. He pays attention and stuff. That's the secret sauce.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Re: Questions for 2008

Exactly how do you get your read on TT? Magic?

Tyrone you moron - he already told you. He pays attention and stuff. That's the secret sauce.

Now, now, scott...we all know i'm a moron..i'm a crackhead!

I want to know exactly what stuff that is. Does he see aura's, is it frenology, body language, color of suit he wears?

I'm convinced that Woody is John Edwards.

[woodbuck27]

Re: Questions for 2008

Good questions JH.


I get a pretty good read on people. As Y'all get to know me you'll see I'm a decent analyst. I pay attention. I see it and call it just that way.

Exactly how do you get your read on TT? Magic? You haven't met him, you haven't talked with him, you don't know anybody who has, you don't know anybody that is privy to his thoughts.

To think you can get a read on someone based on limited exposure thru the MEDIA is asinine at best.

Jaysus he's about as easy to read as a pad of toilet tissue Laddie.

TT= nothing in there

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Questions for 2008

Jaysus he's about as easy to read as a pad of toilet tissue Laddie.

TT= nothing in there

And you say Kiper's analysis is a little shallow?

[b bulldog]

All favre? He had the leading rusher or close to it since week 8 or so, his wr's had the most run after the catch yardage, his Oline did a very good job in protection and he had a solid D. One more thing, by luck, they were pretty much injury free.

[b bulldog]

Brett had a fantastic year and that imo, is some of the reason why he is gone cause I think this year would have been very hard to duplicate at his age.