Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PFW on new contract for Ryan Grant

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by sharpe1027
    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
    I say you guys have a gunfight at high noon tomorrow. 10 paces.
    I'm your huckleberry.
    Where's superfan when we need him?
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Gunakor
      So does this mean that YOU (Sharpe) want to sign him to a contract BELOW market value? I don't get it. What is the COST that you'd like to sign him at? Market value? Below market value? Slightly above market value? Which is it?
      They should sign him according to the value he has to the Packers as a team. What they should not do is get in a bidding war and be forced to pay what some other team values him at. If you agree with this, then you should realize why your strategy carries significantly more risk as Grant could easily play out his RFA contract and either 1) the Packers get nothing or 2) they are forced to pay more than the highest of what 32 other teams would pay him.

      It just doesn't make much sense to take that chance when you can just offer him a 5 year deal now that has little to no ramifications if they want to trade or cut him loose in 3 years.

      I will leave the judgment up to the experts, let's see how this thing plays out.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        Originally posted by sharpe1027
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        I say you guys have a gunfight at high noon tomorrow. 10 paces.
        I'm your huckleberry.
        Where's superfan when we need him?
        Tombstone quotes, that's just my game. Say when..

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by vince
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          Of course, with how players want to renegotiate deals ... it probably doesn't matter.
          I'd say I agree with everything you said here, except for this. If Grant continues to perform as he did last year (which I expect him to), it makes a huge difference in who has negotiating leverage (and how much of it they have) depending on whether the player who wants to renegotiate is locked up for the next three years, or whether he is on the brink of free agency. If I'm a GM (or a fan who is interested in the team's success), I'd much prefer to have the player locked up and under an extended-term contract.
          Yup. Especially given the money we have available.

          It's simple LOCK DOWN logic to me. Extend this RB now for three years.

          PACKERS FOREVER.
          ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
          ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
          ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
          ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

          Comment

          Working...
          X