Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2008 Power Rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Not bad to be at the top to start but how great was the Favre factor last season? HUGE!

    Lot's of changes to come. For some reason I like Dan Diego this season to win the Super Bowl. Time to stop just knockin' on the door.
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by DonHutson
      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
      Vinnie has us #8.
      I agree with this. There's no justification for putting us behind Cleveland and Seattle.
      How is that? The Browns and Seattle both have stability at QB.
      especially Seattle. I think #10 is fair and somewhat generous. Unless the defense is shutdown good games will ride on ARod's arm.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by MadtownPacker
        Originally posted by DonHutson
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        Vinnie has us #8.
        I agree with this. There's no justification for putting us behind Cleveland and Seattle.
        How is that? The Browns and Seattle both have stability at QB.
        especially Seattle. I think #10 is fair and somewhat generous. Unless the defense is shutdown good games will ride on ARod's arm.
        Seattle is fair. Cleveland? I'm not so sure. I'm not convinced Derek Anderson isn't a one year wonder. He had a pretty low completion percentage (56%) for a breakout year, and he also threw 19 interceptions. That was with Braylon Edwards and Kellen Winslow staying healthy and catching everything in sight. Those guys are good, but have had durability issues in the past. I'm not convinced Brady Quinn is any more ready to lead his team than ARod.
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          Originally posted by MadtownPacker
          Originally posted by DonHutson
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          Vinnie has us #8.
          I agree with this. There's no justification for putting us behind Cleveland and Seattle.
          How is that? The Browns and Seattle both have stability at QB.
          especially Seattle. I think #10 is fair and somewhat generous. Unless the defense is shutdown good games will ride on ARod's arm.
          Seattle is fair. Cleveland? I'm not so sure. I'm not convinced Derek Anderson isn't a one year wonder. He had a pretty low completion percentage (56%) for a breakout year, and he also threw 19 interceptions. That was with Braylon Edwards and Kellen Winslow staying healthy and catching everything in sight. Those guys are good, but have had durability issues in the past. I'm not convinced Brady Quinn is any more ready to lead his team than ARod.
          The number IMO is about right

          I assume you feel Seattle is fair because they played in free agency......or because there is a solid assumed dropoff from Favre to AROD ??

          Because IMO Seattle's draft was decent but not spectacular
          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Bretsky
            I assume you feel Seattle is fair because they played in free agency......or because there is a solid assumed dropoff from Favre to AROD??
            Partly because of the dropoff at the QB position. Also, I think we had more good breaks than bad breaks last year. The schedule ended up easier than I thought, we won some close games, and we had very few injuries. Talent-wise, I think we were more like a 11-5, maybe 12-4 team. I think going to ARod makes us more of a 10-6 team.

            Originally posted by Bretsky
            Because IMO Seattle's draft was decent but not spectacular
            Not basing it off that at all. I won't begin to predict how good a team drafted at this point.

            I also think Seattle will be a little better. They get Marcus Tubbs back. They added Lawrence Jackson to go with Patrick Kerney and Darryl Tapp. I do think Mike Wahle was a good pickup for them. At least, for this year it will be a good move. If they can keep Deion Branch healthy, that should help their receiving corps.
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              Originally posted by Bretsky
              I assume you feel Seattle is fair because they played in free agency......or because there is a solid assumed dropoff from Favre to AROD??
              Partly because of the dropoff at the QB position. Also, I think we had more good breaks than bad breaks last year. The schedule ended up easier than I thought, we won some close games, and we had very few injuries. Talent-wise, I think we were more like a 11-5, maybe 12-4 team. I think going to ARod makes us more of a 10-6 team.

              Originally posted by Bretsky
              Because IMO Seattle's draft was decent but not spectacular
              Not basing it off that at all. I won't begin to predict how good a team drafted at this point.

              I also think Seattle will be a little better. They get Marcus Tubbs back. They added Lawrence Jackson to go with Patrick Kerney and Darryl Tapp. I do think Mike Wahle was a good pickup for them. At least, for this year it will be a good move. If they can keep Deion Branch healthy, that should help their receiving corps.

              I agree; Seattle did make some nice free agent moves to upgrade their roster as well so on paper they look to be better than last year.
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment

              Working...
              X