Someone asked about how the Packers attendance at OTAs compares to other teams,....so, like the idiot no life that I am, I wasted a few hours and looked into it. I searched and skimmed many newspaper articles for many teams, over the last few years. I have no intention of citing my sources, just too many to do that. If you trust my research from the past, trust it now. If not, don't. It matters not to me which way you fall.
My general comments and impressions:
GB attendance is quite good. By all reports, 14 players missed the first day, including Green, Driver, Franks and Collins who showed up the second day. It also included Hawk who isn't allowed to be there. GB has "about 100" players, (I figured at least 98). Nine true no shows means 90%+ attendance.
Some teams are happy that they had 80% and better attendance.
In the past some teams have said attendance "wasn't too bad" when they had around 60-70 players.
Some teams cite "near 100%" attendance, absent the "excused" players, and then they identify 6 or 8 of those. Overall, not much different than GB.
Attendance at OTAs is declining.
The NFLPA hates the OTAs and wants them eliminated.
It is VERY common for players to come and go at the OTAs. It has happened for the Packers in the past, too. It happens with all teams.
The local media is scrutinizing the packers much greater than newspapers in other NFL cities, many of which barely comment on the OTAs.
Several factors make the story in GB more interesting even nationally:
1. New coaching staff.
2. Harris.
3. New players Pickett and Woodson.
That's about it. Take it for what it is worth! I'll be happy to respond to questions about things I may have read, or impressions I might have gained.
My general comments and impressions:
GB attendance is quite good. By all reports, 14 players missed the first day, including Green, Driver, Franks and Collins who showed up the second day. It also included Hawk who isn't allowed to be there. GB has "about 100" players, (I figured at least 98). Nine true no shows means 90%+ attendance.
Some teams are happy that they had 80% and better attendance.
In the past some teams have said attendance "wasn't too bad" when they had around 60-70 players.
Some teams cite "near 100%" attendance, absent the "excused" players, and then they identify 6 or 8 of those. Overall, not much different than GB.
Attendance at OTAs is declining.
The NFLPA hates the OTAs and wants them eliminated.
It is VERY common for players to come and go at the OTAs. It has happened for the Packers in the past, too. It happens with all teams.
The local media is scrutinizing the packers much greater than newspapers in other NFL cities, many of which barely comment on the OTAs.
Several factors make the story in GB more interesting even nationally:
1. New coaching staff.
2. Harris.
3. New players Pickett and Woodson.
That's about it. Take it for what it is worth! I'll be happy to respond to questions about things I may have read, or impressions I might have gained.



Comment