Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Important new Packer topic!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Important new Packer topic!

    Anybody got one? I'm bored.

  • #2
    I heard Favre retired.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by MadtownPacker
      I heard Favre retired.
      Or maybe not!

      Comment


      • #4
        The adage "No news is good news" applies here, Patler.

        The Packers have beens spared of news of players involved in strip club shootings, player holdouts, players demanding to be traded, etc.

        Enjoy the boredom!

        Comment


        • #5
          Im going to the OTA tomarrow! WOO HOO! Im an hour and a half away and will take any exuse to head down to GB.

          Comment


          • #6
            Well there's already an Odell Thurmon thread. Dont really care much about other teams.

            How's Flynn looking?
            Originally posted by 3irty1
            This is museum quality stupidity.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by alquaal
              Im going to the OTA tomarrow! WOO HOO! Im an hour and a half away and will take any exuse to head down to GB.
              Hook us up with a write up of what you observed. I am curious if ARod has groupies already.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                I heard Favre retired.
                '
                Wait!!!!! He hasn't filed his paperwork yet!!!!


                (that was for cpk1994 :P )

                Comment


                • #9
                  Boredom is good!!

                  No new injuries.

                  No arrests.

                  No contract disputes/holdouts.

                  Hardly any coaches to replace.

                  No very weak position that hasn't been addressed.

                  No Packer financial/stadium problems.

                  Packer tickets are 6% below NFL average:

                  Team Average Price

                  New England Patriots: $90.89
                  Chicago Bears: $84.89
                  Dallas Cowboys: $84.12
                  New York Giants: $81.29
                  New York Jets: $80.70
                  Washington Redskins: $79.13
                  Baltimore Ravens: $77.20
                  Kansas City Chiefs: $73.92
                  San Diego Chargers: $73.64
                  Tampa Bay Buccaneers: $72.44
                  Denver Broncos: $71.46
                  Indianapolis Colts: $70.98
                  Minnesota Vikings: $70.91
                  Philadelphia Eagles: $69.00
                  St. Louis Rams: $68.28
                  NFL Average: $67.11
                  Miami Dolphins: $66.11
                  Pittsburgh Steelers: $65.94
                  Cincinnati Bengals: $65.85
                  Green Bay Packers: $63.39
                  Houston Texans: $62.41
                  San Francisco 49ers: $62.37
                  Oakland Raiders: $62.23
                  Carolina: $60.44
                  Atlanta Falcons: $60.34
                  Detroit Lions: $59.09
                  Arizona Cardinals: $56.71
                  New Orleans Saints: $54.86
                  Seattle Seahawks: $54.74
                  Tennessee Titans: $54.32
                  Jacksonville Jaguars: $49.38
                  Cleveland Browns: $48.79
                  Buffalo Bills: $46.26

                  No news is good news!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Cheez - That might be what ticket prices are at face value but hell no that aint reflective of the actual cost. Every time I got tickets for a Packers game in San Fran that was the 49ers most expensive and sought after ticket for the whole season.

                    You gonna go to that preseason game in SF?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      How about a raging discussion of whether 'tis better to keep five wideouts and three tight ends or six wideouts and two tight ends?

                      Let the fur fly!
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Fritz
                        How about a raging discussion of whether 'tis better to keep five wideouts and three tight ends or six wideouts and two tight ends?

                        Let the fur fly!
                        If we had 3 legit tightends then maybe this could be a disscusion, but since Lee and Finley are the only legit ones, i have a hard time thinking otherwise.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Charles Woodson
                          Originally posted by Fritz
                          How about a raging discussion of whether 'tis better to keep five wideouts and three tight ends or six wideouts and two tight ends?

                          Let the fur fly!
                          If we had 3 legit tightends then maybe this could be a disscusion, but since Lee and Finley are the only legit ones, i have a hard time thinking otherwise.
                          No love for Tory Humphrey??

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Patler
                            Originally posted by Charles Woodson
                            Originally posted by Fritz
                            How about a raging discussion of whether 'tis better to keep five wideouts and three tight ends or six wideouts and two tight ends?

                            Let the fur fly!
                            If we had 3 legit tightends then maybe this could be a disscusion, but since Lee and Finley are the only legit ones, i have a hard time thinking otherwise.
                            No love for Tory Humphrey??
                            nope

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Charles Woodson
                              Originally posted by Patler
                              Originally posted by Charles Woodson
                              Originally posted by Fritz
                              How about a raging discussion of whether 'tis better to keep five wideouts and three tight ends or six wideouts and two tight ends?

                              Let the fur fly!
                              If we had 3 legit tightends then maybe this could be a disscusion, but since Lee and Finley are the only legit ones, i have a hard time thinking otherwise.
                              No love for Tory Humphrey??
                              nope
                              ..or 6'8" Joey Haynos??

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X