Bears QB competition to begin!(Chuckle)

[Dabaddestbear]

I think our question at QB has been answered Bearman. We still have the best QB in the division. And it's going to be that way for the next decade plus so you had better get used to it.

There you go with those predictions that are not so good most of the time.
Yes, it will get worse. The thing is with Orton I think he is a serviceable QB that can get things done. But you for some reason think that Rodgers is a franchise QB for years to come?..lol
If it wasnt for who I consider two all pro type WR's in Driver in Jennings turning 5 yard dump offs into 40 yard gains then he would have been benched. He has always thrown the ball behind the WR's and too high when they are wide open. I have seen Driver wide open in the flat sometimes and Rodgers would float it up to him in which he would have to jump up to get the ball, which allows the defender to close in on him before he ever lands. This poor accuracy allows defenders to make up too much ground. The only thing that saves him is Driver and Jennings ability to make defenders miss with the first step.

Call me a troll if you want. But I watch football, and even a troll under a bridge can see that Rodgers is too erratic to be with any team for 10 years straight.

I've never called you this before, but obviously tonight you are being the token troll.

Feel free to add something while you are at it

I'd still argue Aaron Rodgers is the best QB in the division ?

Feel free to show some evidence to the contrary instead of showing up to stir shit up

No, the fact is that Rodgers has the best WR duo in the division. Orton has put up very similar numbers with WR's that no one knows. And its not like these WR's just look better because of Rodgers. They were already good. They gave Rodgers the reigns and he is slowly letting it slip away. Defenses have film on him now and is figuring him out. It happens to many QB's that seem to have success early, but then dont know how to adjust to defenses when they adjust to them.

[Pacopete4]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

[th87]

I think our question at QB has been answered Bearman. We still have the best QB in the division. And it's going to be that way for the next decade plus so you had better get used to it.

There you go with those predictions that are not so good most of the time.
Yes, it will get worse. The thing is with Orton I think he is a serviceable QB that can get things done. But you for some reason think that Rodgers is a franchise QB for years to come?..lol
If it wasnt for who I consider two all pro type WR's in Driver in Jennings turning 5 yard dump offs into 40 yard gains then he would have been benched. He has always thrown the ball behind the WR's and too high when they are wide open. I have seen Driver wide open in the flat sometimes and Rodgers would float it up to him in which he would have to jump up to get the ball, which allows the defender to close in on him before he ever lands. This poor accuracy allows defenders to make up too much ground. The only thing that saves him is Driver and Jennings ability to make defenders miss with the first step.

Call me a troll if you want. But I watch football, and even a troll under a bridge can see that Rodgers is too erratic to be with any team for 10 years straight.

I've never called you this before, but obviously tonight you are being the token troll.

Feel free to add something while you are at it

I'd still argue Aaron Rodgers is the best QB in the division ?

Feel free to show some evidence to the contrary instead of showing up to stir shit up

No, the fact is that Rodgers has the best WR duo in the division. Orton has put up very similar numbers with WR's that no one knows. And its not like these WR's just look better because of Rodgers. They were already good. They gave Rodgers the reigns and he is slowly letting it slip away. Defenses have film on him now and is figuring him out. It happens to many QB's that seem to have success early, but then dont know how to adjust to defenses when they adjust to them.

37-3.

[th87]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

uh, yeah, I was really sad knowing that. So here I am! Just for you!

[th87]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

uh, yeah, I was really sad knowing that. So here I am! Just for you!

Not you - get over yourself.

I'm talking about village idiot Paco.

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

uh, yeah, I was really sad knowing that. So here I am! Just for you!

Not you - get over yourself.

I'm talking about village idiot Paco.

Aww, Paco. You cant be getting under your fellow Packer fans skin more than I. That's not fair.

[th87]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

uh, yeah, I was really sad knowing that. So here I am! Just for you!

Not you - get over yourself.

I'm talking about village idiot Paco.

Aww, Paco. You cant be getting under your fellow Packer fans skin more than I. That's not fair.

You haven't revealed yourself as an enemy of logic. This keeps you higher on the pecking order.

[Pacopete4]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

uh, yeah, I was really sad knowing that. So here I am! Just for you!

Not you - get over yourself.

I'm talking about village idiot Paco.

Aww, Paco. You cant be getting under your fellow Packer fans skin more than I. That's not fair.

You haven't revealed yourself as an enemy of logic. This keeps you higher on the pecking order.

just because the packers blow... dont get ur panties in a bunch

[th87]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

couldnt agree more Dabaddestbear... people on here are ok with TT being under .500 as a GM. They'll throw every excuse in the book out there to justify their reason.. its just how things go on this board. I said around week 3 that the Vikings and the Bears were better... welp its the end of the season and we're now seeing that.

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

The forum was better without you.

uh, yeah, I was really sad knowing that. So here I am! Just for you!

Not you - get over yourself.

I'm talking about village idiot Paco.

Aww, Paco. You cant be getting under your fellow Packer fans skin more than I. That's not fair.

You haven't revealed yourself as an enemy of logic. This keeps you higher on the pecking order.

just because the packers blow... dont get ur panties in a bunch

I'm okay. I'm still me. You'll wake up tomorrow and still be a loser.

[Gunakor]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

37-3. Next question.

[cpk1994]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

just because the packers blow... dont get ur panties in a bunch

I'm okay. I'm still me. You'll wake up tomorrow and still be a loser.

You are being generous by calling him just a loser. Just when I thought the forum was getting better again, the troll came back.

[Gunakor]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

but hey.. we now have optimism! We traded away the winningest QB ever and in his first season of absence we are 5-8 with 3 to play... great time to be a Packers fan! Thanks TT...

I'm sure the difference between 5-8 and 11-2 is the shitty play from our QB this season... Yeah, that's gotta be it.

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

37-3. Next question.

Hmm, lets see..
No need to ask a question when I can just make a statement..or two..lol.
Bears Swept the Packers last year, was predicted to finish next to last in the division, yet leads the Packers by TWO GAMES! -- LOL. You and your football logic is a joke. please do the rest of your Packer fan brethren a favor and stop embarrassing them.

[Gunakor]

Re: NFL Power Rankings: 2008 Week 6 edition

Wake up at take a sip of ur KOOL-AID ! Da BEARS are atop the NFCN as they should be ! Kyle has them running on all cylinders. The "D" is coming of age, they have a run game that is legit, the team seems poised to make another run for the money !
Now the pack on the other hand , is on the way down the scale, no "O" line, questions at QB, TE, LB, RB. There is always next year, ...

I'm sure you are looking forward to it. That's the motto of Chicago sports teams nowadays, is it not?

Your defense is not coming of age, they are getting too old. The production from your legit run game was doubled by a team with no OL and questions at QB, TE, and RB, and against a team with questions at DL and LB. Owned. But, there's always next year, right?

And your defense is?
Your running game existed when and where?
This team has had questions at QB, RB, secondary, TE, ect... The only sure spot they had was 1 WR and they walked the field with little resistance.
Yes, there is always next year. -- or is the Motto of GB fans (namely you) "well no matter how much we look like we suck, we really dont cuz....(insert your random dumb excuse here)
But really it's just your analysis of the NFL and its teams just SUCK!

37-3. Next question.

Hmm, lets see..
No need to ask a question when I can just make a statement..or two..lol.
Bears Swept the Packers last year, was predicted to finish next to last in the division, yet leads the Packers by TWO GAMES! -- LOL. You and your football logic is a joke. please do the rest of your Packer fan brethren a favor and stop embarrassing them.

We have another game yet this season. Until then the only game between the Bears and Packers was a rout by the Packers. Last year was last year. It means absolutely nothing. This year you made our Packers look like Super Bowl Champions, regardless how much of a lead you have on us. And please, if any of my Packer fan brethren are embarrased that we stomped all over your sorry asses, they aren't Packer fans in the first place.