Originally posted by BallHawk
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bears QB competition to begin!(Chuckle)
Collapse
X
-
You should really stop putting words in my mouth. That's utter bs.Originally posted by cpk1994No, but Partial will.Originally posted by GunakorCertainly you aren't putting this one on Rodgers too. He had moved the ball inside the Bears 20 yard line with 25 seconds to go in the game. Maybe he gets even closer if MM doesn't call 3 running plays in a row, taking the ball out of Rodgers' hands. I don't know. But considering where this offense was with less than 30 seconds to go, I'd say Rodgers met his end of the bargain last night.Originally posted by DabaddestbearStop it you guys.
How many times do I have to repeat to the deaf, dumb , and blind that I was NEVER bragging about Orton. Find ONE thread where I was. If not then shut the hell up making up lies just to support your own feeble attempts at stirring things up.
Now Orton was bad tonight just like he have been since his return from the ankle injury, but each time when it counted he put the Bears in position to WIN the game. I take a WIN over stats any day. And so if you want to keep on knocking the kid, just keep in mind that his wins are steadily stacking up, while Rodgers is just compiling losses.
Take notice, I was always knocking Rodgers more than I was actually praising Orton. And that was only because you guys made him out to be a laughing stock, while he is the QB of the team that is WINNING!
Rodgers has been in position 8 times this year to win games for his team and has been unable to do it. Everyone wants a QB that can get it done when it counts in the clutch. Maybe Orton is not that guy, but surely in that case, Rodgers isn't even close..lol.
Never the less, this was a nice hard fought game that had many breaks going both ways. I just love this rivalry.
I don't blame this one on Rodgers. He played OK in the first half, and the offense as a whole was awful in the second half.
Where is the accountability for 3 second half points?!?
Comment
-
On the offensive line trying to block for a chip shot Mason Crosby would be game winning field goal. There should have been 6, and 6 would have won the game.Originally posted by PartialYou should really stop putting words in my mouth. That's utter bs.Originally posted by cpk1994No, but Partial will.Originally posted by GunakorCertainly you aren't putting this one on Rodgers too. He had moved the ball inside the Bears 20 yard line with 25 seconds to go in the game. Maybe he gets even closer if MM doesn't call 3 running plays in a row, taking the ball out of Rodgers' hands. I don't know. But considering where this offense was with less than 30 seconds to go, I'd say Rodgers met his end of the bargain last night.Originally posted by DabaddestbearStop it you guys.
How many times do I have to repeat to the deaf, dumb , and blind that I was NEVER bragging about Orton. Find ONE thread where I was. If not then shut the hell up making up lies just to support your own feeble attempts at stirring things up.
Now Orton was bad tonight just like he have been since his return from the ankle injury, but each time when it counted he put the Bears in position to WIN the game. I take a WIN over stats any day. And so if you want to keep on knocking the kid, just keep in mind that his wins are steadily stacking up, while Rodgers is just compiling losses.
Take notice, I was always knocking Rodgers more than I was actually praising Orton. And that was only because you guys made him out to be a laughing stock, while he is the QB of the team that is WINNING!
Rodgers has been in position 8 times this year to win games for his team and has been unable to do it. Everyone wants a QB that can get it done when it counts in the clutch. Maybe Orton is not that guy, but surely in that case, Rodgers isn't even close..lol.
Never the less, this was a nice hard fought game that had many breaks going both ways. I just love this rivalry.
I don't blame this one on Rodgers. He played OK in the first half, and the offense as a whole was awful in the second half.
Where is the accountability for 3 second half points?!?Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
Neither field goal in that weather is a chip shot.Originally posted by GunakorOn the offensive line trying to block for a chip shot Mason Crosby would be game winning field goal. There should have been 6, and 6 would have won the game.Originally posted by PartialYou should really stop putting words in my mouth. That's utter bs.Originally posted by cpk1994No, but Partial will.Originally posted by GunakorCertainly you aren't putting this one on Rodgers too. He had moved the ball inside the Bears 20 yard line with 25 seconds to go in the game. Maybe he gets even closer if MM doesn't call 3 running plays in a row, taking the ball out of Rodgers' hands. I don't know. But considering where this offense was with less than 30 seconds to go, I'd say Rodgers met his end of the bargain last night.Originally posted by DabaddestbearStop it you guys.
How many times do I have to repeat to the deaf, dumb , and blind that I was NEVER bragging about Orton. Find ONE thread where I was. If not then shut the hell up making up lies just to support your own feeble attempts at stirring things up.
Now Orton was bad tonight just like he have been since his return from the ankle injury, but each time when it counted he put the Bears in position to WIN the game. I take a WIN over stats any day. And so if you want to keep on knocking the kid, just keep in mind that his wins are steadily stacking up, while Rodgers is just compiling losses.
Take notice, I was always knocking Rodgers more than I was actually praising Orton. And that was only because you guys made him out to be a laughing stock, while he is the QB of the team that is WINNING!
Rodgers has been in position 8 times this year to win games for his team and has been unable to do it. Everyone wants a QB that can get it done when it counts in the clutch. Maybe Orton is not that guy, but surely in that case, Rodgers isn't even close..lol.
Never the less, this was a nice hard fought game that had many breaks going both ways. I just love this rivalry.
I don't blame this one on Rodgers. He played OK in the first half, and the offense as a whole was awful in the second half.
Where is the accountability for 3 second half points?!?
Comment
-
The kick wasn't blocked because Mase couldn't get his footing. The kick wasn't blocked because Flynn couldn't get the hold down. It wasn't blocked because of the wind. It was blocked because our guys up front couldn't keep the Bears from pushing them back nearly THREE YARDS in a matter of a second or two. So you can make all the excuses you want to that it was or was not a chip shot, but you can't deflect blame for the block. That's where the accountability lies. Thus, that's where the accountability lies in there being only 3 points scored in the second half, and shares a large share of the accountability in the defeat.Originally posted by PartialNeither field goal in that weather is a chip shot.Originally posted by GunakorOn the offensive line trying to block for a chip shot Mason Crosby would be game winning field goal. There should have been 6, and 6 would have won the game.Originally posted by PartialYou should really stop putting words in my mouth. That's utter bs.Originally posted by cpk1994No, but Partial will.Originally posted by GunakorCertainly you aren't putting this one on Rodgers too. He had moved the ball inside the Bears 20 yard line with 25 seconds to go in the game. Maybe he gets even closer if MM doesn't call 3 running plays in a row, taking the ball out of Rodgers' hands. I don't know. But considering where this offense was with less than 30 seconds to go, I'd say Rodgers met his end of the bargain last night.Originally posted by DabaddestbearStop it you guys.
How many times do I have to repeat to the deaf, dumb , and blind that I was NEVER bragging about Orton. Find ONE thread where I was. If not then shut the hell up making up lies just to support your own feeble attempts at stirring things up.
Now Orton was bad tonight just like he have been since his return from the ankle injury, but each time when it counted he put the Bears in position to WIN the game. I take a WIN over stats any day. And so if you want to keep on knocking the kid, just keep in mind that his wins are steadily stacking up, while Rodgers is just compiling losses.
Take notice, I was always knocking Rodgers more than I was actually praising Orton. And that was only because you guys made him out to be a laughing stock, while he is the QB of the team that is WINNING!
Rodgers has been in position 8 times this year to win games for his team and has been unable to do it. Everyone wants a QB that can get it done when it counts in the clutch. Maybe Orton is not that guy, but surely in that case, Rodgers isn't even close..lol.
Never the less, this was a nice hard fought game that had many breaks going both ways. I just love this rivalry.
I don't blame this one on Rodgers. He played OK in the first half, and the offense as a whole was awful in the second half.
Where is the accountability for 3 second half points?!?Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
I know, he's bad. He was saying today on ESPN First Take that if the Packers had kept Favre they would of easily won the division.Originally posted by cpk1994Never mention that retards name again.Originally posted by BallHawkAnd then there was Skip Bayless......
Yes, I know, he belongs on this forum.
"I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley
Comment
-
Yeah, because if they had Favre on this team the defense would surely come up with key stops, Mason Crosby doesn't miss a GW FG, and our QB would certainly not throw an INT with under 2 minutes to go and needing a score. Wouldn't happen. I thought the younger crowd here at PR that suggested as much was wrong, but now that Skip Bayless has agreed with them, I think I'll reconsider my position.Originally posted by BallHawkI know, he's bad. He was saying today on ESPN First Take that if the Packers had kept Favre they would of easily won the division.Originally posted by cpk1994Never mention that retards name again.Originally posted by BallHawkAnd then there was Skip Bayless......
Yes, I know, he belongs on this forum.
Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
He reared his uglyy head again. He and Stephen A. Smith were on 1st & 10 talking about who had the better year, Favre or Pennington. Bayless picked Favre and made up every excuse he could for Favre's shortcomings. Smith, who I really hate, then went out and totally punked that clown. Bayless tried to make the argument that Favre had the better year becuase he beat the Titans and the Patriots. Smith than proceded to list the losses to Oakland, SF, Seattle etc. and smaked around Bayless so bad that he started to whine. It got to the point where even Dana Jacobson implied that Skip was an idiot. It was awesome.Originally posted by BallHawkI know, he's bad. He was saying today on ESPN First Take that if the Packers had kept Favre they would of easily won the division.Originally posted by cpk1994Never mention that retards name again.Originally posted by BallHawkAnd then there was Skip Bayless......
Yes, I know, he belongs on this forum.
Comment
-
Yeah, ignore the fact that I reside in Wisconsin and have watched every Packer game this season.Originally posted by BallHawkDBB is making it painstakingly obvious that he gets his opinions on Aaron Rodgers from the mainstream media.
And pay attention to what I post son, and you will see that I do not just say what the mainstream does, I was saying these things when they were still praising Rodgers!
Comment

Comment