OFFICIAL BRETT FAVRE WANTS TO PLAY AGAIN THREAD!!!!

[Green Bud Packer]

It's not fair to the fans who paid a fortune for tickets to be a part of franchise history on MNF against the Vikings. I really hate Favre for this. He should not have done it.

Chill out, it's just another dumb rumor. and don't blame Favre because season ticket holders are selling out and ripping off the real fans.

Those who sell their Packer tickets for profit are nothing more than whores in my book.

Let the true fans enjoy the games.

[woodbuck27]

It has seemed obvious to me that TT's management style and approach doesn't reflect a man that just loved Brett Favre around. ie Randy Moss and Ted sleeping on that one that just slipped away, after a low ball cursory offer to Oakland.

You mean the "low ball offer" that Oakland was going to accept until the Patriots jumped in at the last minute?

Face it, Woody, TT didn't have a secret desire to get rid of Favre. A-Rod was his boy and TT wanted him to do well as the Packers QB, but he wasn't going to run off one of the top 5 QBs of all time for an unproven kid from Cal.

I respect your stance BallHawk and it's merits.

[Bretsky]

If you were GM, do you take him back?

Do you piss A-Rod off and make him sit? What if they think A-Rod is better than Favre? These are questions I'd like answered.

If they think Favre is better than AROD and can lead them to a title you take him back; if they think AROD is better then Favre you trade him to the AFC. Me ? I welcome Favre back and trade for Jason Taylor

[Green Bud Packer]

My arms are open.

[PackerTimer]

If you were GM, do you take him back?

Do you piss A-Rod off and make him sit? What if they think A-Rod is better than Favre? These are questions I'd like answered.

If they think Favre is better than AROD and can lead them to a title you take him back; if they think AROD is better then Favre you trade him to the AFC. Me ? I welcome Favre back and trade for Jason Taylor

If you welcome Favre back, I think AROD might have to be moved. I don't see him wanting to come back to ride the pine for another year, maybe two, and why would he. I wouldn't want to sit for four or five years.

[woodbuck27]

If you were GM, do you take him back?

Do you piss A-Rod off and make him sit? What if they think A-Rod is better than Favre? These are questions I'd like answered.

If they think Favre is better than AROD and can lead them to a title you take him back; if they think AROD is better then Favre you trade him to the AFC. Me ? I welcome Favre back and trade for Jason Taylor

It's just too simple for some. I've seen that all day. What a boost and sensable move for 'a winner'.

Thinkers/ logical Vs Feeler/emotional types. Difficult.

[MJZiggy]

If you were GM, do you take him back?

Do you piss A-Rod off and make him sit? What if they think A-Rod is better than Favre? These are questions I'd like answered.

If they think Favre is better than AROD and can lead them to a title you take him back; if they think AROD is better then Favre you trade him to the AFC. Me ? I welcome Favre back and trade for Jason Taylor

If you welcome Favre back, I think AROD might have to be moved. I don't see him wanting to come back to ride the pine for another year, maybe two, and why would he. I wouldn't want to sit for four or five years.

You move ARod and Favre tears a knee up in the season opener (it's called a hypothetical people). Now you have no Favre and no A-Rod. Now what do you do?

[Bretsky]

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d8060e4f6&campaign=ec0009

[Partial]

If you were GM, do you take him back?

Do you piss A-Rod off and make him sit? What if they think A-Rod is better than Favre? These are questions I'd like answered.

If they think Favre is better than AROD and can lead them to a title you take him back; if they think AROD is better then Favre you trade him to the AFC. Me ? I welcome Favre back and trade for Jason Taylor

If you welcome Favre back, I think AROD might have to be moved. I don't see him wanting to come back to ride the pine for another year, maybe two, and why would he. I wouldn't want to sit for four or five years.

You move ARod and Favre tears a knee up in the season opener (it's called a hypothetical people). Now you have no Favre and no A-Rod. Now what do you do?

How's that any different than where they are now, though? If anything, they're in safer hands with Favre behind center.

[MJZiggy]

It's different because now if they had to, they could invite Favre back, but they can't do that if he has a torn up knee and A-Rod's playing for another team.

[Bretsky]

If you were GM, do you take him back?

Do you piss A-Rod off and make him sit? What if they think A-Rod is better than Favre? These are questions I'd like answered.

If they think Favre is better than AROD and can lead them to a title you take him back; if they think AROD is better then Favre you trade him to the AFC. Me ? I welcome Favre back and trade for Jason Taylor

If you welcome Favre back, I think AROD might have to be moved. I don't see him wanting to come back to ride the pine for another year, maybe two, and why would he. I wouldn't want to sit for four or five years.

You move ARod and Favre tears a knee up in the season opener (it's called a hypothetical people). Now you have no Favre and no A-Rod. Now what do you do?

If fear of injury governs the decision, I'd be much more afraid AROD gets injured or tears something.

The injury if is the least of the factors IMO

[Bretsky]

It's different because now if they had to, they could invite Favre back, but they can't do that if he has a torn up knee and A-Rod's playing for another team.

AROD is under contract; only way you trade him is if you get great value. And if by chance you do TT would get a vet in here.

[ND72]

I'm gonna say it now, #4 will be in Lambeau next season, and every season after, since they'll be retiring his number game #1 vs. Minnesota.

[MJZiggy]

I'm saying if you move your most qualified backup because Favre comes back, then you don't have your backup. I'm not saying it has a bearing on what to do with Favre, but just because his old bones haven't snapped in 17 years, doesn't mean they won't in the 18th. He damn near broke his streak over a funny bone injury remember.

[Scott Campbell]

.........but the Packers in their current state want to protect themselves, so they put a front up that they are better off without Favre. Really? Better off without Favre?

Better off without a 28 year old Favre. No way in hell. Better off without a 38 year old Favre isn't nearly as far fetched.