Ted Thompson and the Favre Situation

[Brainerd]

Every bit of evidence that Vince and others have posted about this mess points to TT be very clear about wanting Favre gone. Yet, all the TT lovers continue to rant that TT didn't want Favre gone. Too funny.

Every bit of evidence? Didn't Vince just post this?

"Other than that, it's not my place to try to convince someone that they're making a bad decision or a good decision. It's my place to say, these are the facts as I see them, now it's up to you and Deanna to make your choice."

That suggests Thompson would have welcomed Favre back. Thus, it's puzzling that Bonita Favre and Jones are so critical of the Packers' general manager.

Was Thompson supposed to get down on his knees in March and beg Brett to return? That would be a ridiculous expectation.

Since when does a superstar quarterback need to be coddled? If Brett wanted to play but perceived he wasn't wanted, he should have drawn on his competitive nature to prove Thompson and the organization wrong.

It should be noted Favre went out of his way at his retirement press conference on March 6 to thank Thompson and absolve the Packers organization of playing a role in his departure.

Vince also posted other, evidence. You have a search function. Use it. Don't stop searching cause it feels good. Search till it hurts.[/i]

[Brainerd]

Re: Favre

I can remember arguing constantly with them about it. Then, when I was proven right, very few of them had the class to admit to being wrong. Instead, the teams success was all due to Teddy and MM.

I see. So who said the teams success was all due to Teddy and MM?




I must have missed those posts.

You did. You really, really did.

[Scott Campbell]

Vince also posted other, evidence.

Well of course he did. I never said other wise. You said:

"Every bit of evidence that Vince and others have posted about this mess points to TT be very clear about wanting Favre gone. "


I proved you to be factually incorrect. Maybe you exaggerated a little bit - huh?

[Scott Campbell]

Re: Favre

I can remember arguing constantly with them about it. Then, when I was proven right, very few of them had the class to admit to being wrong. Instead, the teams success was all due to Teddy and MM.

I see. So who said the teams success was all due to Teddy and MM?




I must have missed those posts.

You did. You really, really did.

Is this a some kind of a straw man argument Brainhurt?

[Brainerd]

Vince also posted other, evidence.

Of course he did. I never said other wise. You said:

"Every bit of evidence that Vince and others have posted about this mess points to TT be very clear about wanting Favre gone. "


I proved you to be factually incorrect. Maybe you exaggerated a little bit - huh?

Overstated, maybe. If only you were as anal retentive to others as you are with me I wouldn't have to blink twice when I come to this board for Packers info. Sometimes I swear I accidently stumbled onto the Thompson Rats board by mistake.

[Scott Campbell]

Overstated, maybe.

Maybe? Maybe???


Dude, you were wrong. Ain't no maybe about it. Just man up and admit it.

[Brainerd]

Overstated, maybe.

Maybe? Maybe???


Dude, you were wrong. Ain't no maybe about it. Just man up and admit it.

Nope. Not wrong. Say what you will and twist how you want. Not wrong. One more time. Not wrong. Clear?

And I'll let you know when I would ever consider accepting a man-up from the likes of you. Um K?

[Scott Campbell]

Gotcha. Overstated - maybe. Not wrong.

And who's anal retentive now? Just like you said about those other poster's you didn't agree with - too funny!

[Brainerd]

Gotcha. Overstated - maybe. Not wrong.

And who's anal retentive now?

Who's only argument is to make fun of someone else's handle? Brainhurt? Come on. Don't worry. I understand about the feeble.

And for the last time you poor afflicted ADD man. Brainerd is a town in Minnesota. Make fun of Minnesota next. Um, K?

[Scott Campbell]

And I'll let you know when I would ever consider accepting a man-up from the likes of you. Um K?

Here's Scott's take on this point. You man up and admit you are wrong solely on the merit of an argument. It shouldn't matter who you're arguing with.

[Brainerd]

And I'll let you know when I would ever consider accepting a man-up from the likes of you. Um K?

Here's Scott's take on this point. You man up and admit you are wrong solely on the merit of an argument. It shouldn't matter who you're arguing with.

The color of the sky in your world is still blue, right?

[Scott Campbell]

Make fun of Minnesota next. Um, K?

Who needs to make fun of Minnesota when you keep saying stuff like "Um, K".

[Scott Campbell]

Who's only argument is to make fun of someone else's handle? Brainhurt? Come on. Don't worry. I understand about the feeble.

Here, I'll show you how it's done.


Yes, it was feeble - almost childish. I plead guilty as charged!


Notice that I changed it from Brainhurt.

[Brainerd]

Make fun of Minnesota next. Um, K?

Who needs to make fun of Minnesota when you keep saying stuff like "Um, K".

Um, K.

You make fun of someone's handle because you have zero argument and then have the nerve, not balls, balls are certainly foreign to you unless of course they are slapping you in the face, to say man-up?

Um, K.

[The Leaper]

Arguing about what Vince Lombardi would've done is stupid. No one knows what Lombardi would've done in this circumstance.

I know that Lombardi would've liked Favre. I know that Lombardi would've done what he thought was best for the Packers. How those facts merge with the current situation...I have no idea.