Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers want Favre as a backup?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers want Favre as a backup?

    Pack want Favre as backup?
    A Brett Favre comeback plan? Looks more like a backup plan.
    The Packers legend asked the team for his unconditional release on Friday, but the organization has no intention of granting that request, FOXSports.com has learned. If anything, sources say, the team is prepared to welcome Favre back as a backup to Aaron Rodgers.

    Rodgers has worked as the team's starter for the last five months and Green Bay has been operating under that assumption since Favre announced his retirement in the beginning of March. Favre re-affirmed his decision to retire at the end of March.

    At this point, Green Bay would trade Favre before releasing him, sources indicate. The team has the cap space to take on Favre's huge salary, but it would rather deal him than give him up for nothing, if those were the two options.

    Friday's letter asking for his release is just the latest in what has been quite a soap opera involving Favre and the team this offseason.

    As word of his desire to play leaked out, the team has treated the news largely as hearsay, as this is not the first time this offseason that Favre has made such a request.


    In late March during the NFL Owners Meeting Favre informed the team he wanted to play again, multiple sources have told FOXSports.com. Not only did he insist he was returning, both head coach Mike McCarthy and GM Ted Thompson agreed that he still had something left and they would welcome him back. Despite the fact that those close to Favre have stated Thompson did not want Favre back, Thompson was the deciding factor in agreeing it was not too late to have him un-retire at that time and start for the Packers in 2008.

    In fact, team brass went as far as chartering a jet to fly to Mississippi to make it official later that week. The agreement was that the NFL's all-time leading passer would return for the year but help make it easier and palatable for Aaron Rodgers, who would have to wait another season to take the helm.

    The group was set for this huge move when Favre suddenly phoned the team two days before the meeting was to take place and informed McCarthy that he had changed his mind yet again and was staying retired. While team officials were stunned by Favre's reversal, they made the decision to move on and draft his replacement, a move that Favre at the time understood. The Packers selected two quarterbacks in April's draft, Louisville's Brian Brohm in the 2nd round and LSU's Matt Flynn in the 7th round.

    Then, a few weeks ago, Favre phoned the team stating he had that "itch" again to play. However, since he had jilted the Packers in March, the team simply took his latest request with a grain of salt. In addition, the team has put considerable time and attention into making Rodgers comfortable as the heir apparent.

    The bottom line at this point is the soap opera is unfortunately growing and likely won't die any time soon.

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/8335678/Sourcesackers-won't-release-Favre

  • #2
    No they don't.

    Translation: Favre will be on the roster until he agrees to a trade.
    #14

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Packers want Favre as a backup?

      As they say on the politcal blogs, money quote:

      Originally posted by Brando19
      Pack want Favre as backup?
      As word of his desire to play leaked out, the team has treated the news largely as hearsay, as this is not the first time this offseason that Favre has made such a request.

      In late March during the NFL Owners Meeting Favre informed the team he wanted to play again, multiple sources have told FOXSports.com. Not only did he insist he was returning, both head coach Mike McCarthy and GM Ted Thompson agreed that he still had something left and they would welcome him back. Despite the fact that those close to Favre have stated Thompson did not want Favre back, Thompson was the deciding factor in agreeing it was not too late to have him un-retire at that time and start for the Packers in 2008.

      In fact, team brass went as far as chartering a jet to fly to Mississippi to make it official later that week. The agreement was that the NFL's all-time leading passer would return for the year but help make it easier and palatable for Aaron Rodgers, who would have to wait another season to take the helm.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #4
        Paging Leaper. Your "TT doesn't want Brett" theory just sprung a huge leak.

        Comment


        • #5
          Why would the significantly better player be riding the pine? If anything, it'd be A-Rod is the incumbent, but do you really think M3 thinks he is better than Brett? C'mon...

          Comment


          • #6
            Imagine how many fans would be hoping Rodgers would get hurt the season opener so Favre could play? They'd probably be throwing rocks at Aaron!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Brando19
              Imagine how many fans would be hoping Rodgers would get hurt the season opener so Favre could play? They'd probably be throwing rocks at Aaron!
              As long as they are not throwing their beer.

              Comment


              • #8
                Rodgers will be injured and unable to play by no later than the third game, and then Favre is the guy again.

                There is nothing to prove with Rodgers' history of getting so banged up in only spot duty that he will last even more than one game.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by VegasPackFan
                  Rodgers will be injured and unable to play by no later than the third game, and then Favre is the guy again.

                  There is nothing to prove with Rodgers' history of getting so banged up in only spot duty that he will last even more than one game.
                  Because two injuries shows a history of being banged up. That crap is getting old.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by cpk1994
                    Originally posted by VegasPackFan
                    Rodgers will be injured and unable to play by no later than the third game, and then Favre is the guy again.

                    There is nothing to prove with Rodgers' history of getting so banged up in only spot duty that he will last even more than one game.
                    Because two injuries shows a history of being banged up. That crap is getting old.
                    It not just two injuries. He's batting 1.000 for opportunities/injuries. Every chance he has had to come in and play when the game was still in contention ended up with him being unable to practice or play from then on.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Weird, but I dont remember him getting hurt in the Dallas game. Seems to me it was during practice the week after that he pulled a hammy.
                      Originally posted by 3irty1
                      This is museum quality stupidity.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        no way this would happen

                        we play to win

                        you don't keep the better qb on the bench

                        many people would lose their jobs if that happened

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Zool
                          Weird, but I dont remember him getting hurt in the Dallas game. Seems to me it was during practice the week after that he pulled a hammy.
                          Try the next practice. Also, how do we know it wasn't during the game and he didn't want to publicize it? Regardless, has he played in a game and been able to play the next week? No.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by red
                            no way this would happen

                            we play to win

                            you don't keep the better qb on the bench

                            many people would lose their jobs if that happened
                            ONe guy should lose his job if Brett is outright released.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Partial
                              Originally posted by Zool
                              Weird, but I dont remember him getting hurt in the Dallas game. Seems to me it was during practice the week after that he pulled a hammy.
                              Try the next practice. Also, how do we know it wasn't during the game and he didn't want to publicize it? Regardless, has he played in a game and been able to play the next week? No.
                              Was he needed in the next game, no.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X