Does anyone know how Chad Jackson is doing?

[PackerPro42]

What ever, when I didn't have any proof that he had good hands you bitched about it. Now that I do have proof it's not good enough for you. I guess there's no pleasing you.

[BallHawk]

We never said he didn't have good hands, we said he was more of a burner than an actual NFL caliber receiver.

But right now, with Jennings looking very promising and Chad Jackson not taken an NFL snap, do you still think we should of picked Chad?

[PackerPro42]

Yes.

[BallHawk]

Explain why.

[PackerPro42]

And as for the Burner comment, you did not just say that. You said he was afraid to go ovver the middle because he didn't have good hands and you said that Jennings had way better hands than Jackson. Oh, and Jennings didn't look to hot his first game. One catch in the last minutes of the game. Not to mention, it was a short dump route he ran and Chicago was expecting GB to go deep.

[BallHawk]

How'd Jackson do in his first game?

[PackerPro42]

He had 50 catches. You didn't hear?

[PackerPro42]

Jackson was one catch short of having the same stats as Jennings and he didn't even play.

[BallHawk]

What about in the preseason?

[PackerPro42]

What about it, those stats don't count.

[falco]

of course, one game into each players careers is a good time to nominate them for the HOF.

[PackerPro42]

No one said anything about the HOF.

[BallHawk]

Who's looked more impressive so far? Training camp, preseason, regular season in all.

Jennings or Jackson?

[PackerPro42]

Jackson actually looked really impressive in traing camp.

[BallHawk]

Jackson actually looked really impressive in traing camp.

You realize he only attended three practices.