Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If the Packers thought they needed Brett to win

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by DonHutson
    Their best chance to win comes from having a QB who is 100% committed physically and mentally to the team - now, in the playoffs, and every week (check that, every DAY) in between.

    The real question then is whether they can believe Favre is that guy all of a sudden after Favre himself doubted that all summer long. It would appear that the Packers are not convinced and they would like Favre to prove it before they give him his starting job back.

    I have little doubt that Favre is still more talented. I can't help being concerned that football may become a burden to him again at some point before the season is over.
    Geee I wish you to be absolutely correct, but that's not the way it is. Do I ever hope I'm wrong but NO!

    TT has it where he's wanted it for some time. no backing down fr. him now unless his Boss's direct otherwise. He really buys more time with his constant slant on re-building. Now it's the let's get our new starting QB grounded and winning on some consistent basis.

    TT's a sly fox.

    I didn't select either option in this poll. The proper selection wasn't available. The poll is 'as foxy' as our management.
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by texaspackerbacker
      I was gonna say, stupidly worded poll; How could anybody possibly vote no, they don't care about wins and losses; But low and behold, 52% voted no--go figure!
      thats why i never vote in these polls. you'll learn, son. :P

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
        Slanted question. I think that Thompson is actually looking past 2008. He is done he has worked the free agent market, picked his rookies, and outside of the waiver wire at the beginning of September his job has already been completed for 2008.
        So what was Ryan Grant last year?

        Thompson's job for 2008 sure as hell better not be done.
        My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by texaspackerbacker
          I was gonna say, stupidly worded poll; How could anybody possibly vote no, they don't care about wins and losses; But low and behold, 52% voted no--go figure!
          It isn't that they don't care at all about winning...but whether or not winning in 2008 is more important than other factors.

          So I guess you could say it is poorly worded, but I got the drift and think it is a valid question to ask of people.
          My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: If the Packers thought they needed Brett to win

            Originally posted by JustinHarrell
            What do you think?
            I think its obvious. Maybe give some thought before you create these posts. If MM and TT thought ARod couldnt win !) he wouldnt here at all, and 2) Brett wouldnt get the "push back" he's getting now. What other explanation can there be?

            p.s Jesus would never have voted for same sex marriage or partial birth abortions.
            Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

            Comment

            Working...
            X