Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Power Rankings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by boiga
    Sure the NFC might have more parity than AFC, but both have just as many lousy teams as quality ones. The supposed talent gap between the conferences is bull.
    I agree.

    Sure, the AFC has more high quality teams...it also has more poor quality teams.

    On one hand, you've got the Patriots, Colts, Jags and Chargers.

    On the other hand, you've got the Raiders, Jets, Dolphins, Chiefs and Ravens.

    The NFC doesn't have as many high quality teams, but it also doesn't have nearly as many non-competitive teams.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by boiga
      Originally posted by bobblehead
      As usual of late the NFC looks weak. I'm sticking with my prediction earlier this offseason that the Chargers go 14-2 and win the superbowl this year.

      I think the Titans will surprise also, but ultimately they play in the AFC.
      I never did understand this line of thinking. Last year the NFC tied the AFC in interconference regular season games 32-32 and won the tie breaking Super Bowl.

      Sure the NFC might have more parity than AFC, but both have just as many lousy teams as quality ones. The supposed talent gap between the conferences is bull.

      In regards to the list above, odds are it will be as bunkum as last years preseason power rankings. Considering the authors are guessing out of their rears, that should come as expected.
      It's because all the national writers are in love with the Patriots, Colts and Chargers
      --
      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

      Comment

      Working...
      X